Sonoelastography and Lumbopelvic Muscle Stiffness in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review:.

IF 0.5 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Galen Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-14 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.31661/gmj.v12i.2465
Hossein Rafsanjani Deh Qazi, Mohammad Ali Mohseni-Bandpei, Nahid Rahmani
{"title":"Sonoelastography and Lumbopelvic Muscle Stiffness in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review:.","authors":"Hossein Rafsanjani Deh Qazi, Mohammad Ali Mohseni-Bandpei, Nahid Rahmani","doi":"10.31661/gmj.v12i.2465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to systematically review studies conducted on the application of sonoelastography (SE) to evaluate lumbopelvic muscle stiffness in patients with low back pain (LBP). All relevant articles were retrieved from the available electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and CINAHL, using the keywords \"Sonoelastography\", \"Elasticity Imaging Technique\", \"Muscle Stiffness\", \"Modulus Elasticity\", \"Low Back Pain\". After initial searches, studies that met the inclusion criteria (i.e., published in English and sonoelastography were used to assess lumbopelvic muscle stiffness in both patients with LBP and healthy individuals) were enrolled. Also, any animal research, abstract of the seminar and/or conference, and/or non-English-language article were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. In total, eight relevant studies were selected for review. Three studies were considered to have excellent quality, and five were considered fair quality using the PEDro scale. All reviewed studies have reported that SE can be considered a non-invasive method for quantifying changes in lumbopelvic muscle stiffness. Muscle stiffness was significantly higher in LBP patients compared to healthy persons, as well as across subgroups of LBP patients in various test postures (P˂0.05). Only one study was conducted on the reliability of SE in healthy individuals, while another examined the validity of SE imaging. The results of the present systematic review indicated that SE imaging is a reliable and valid tool to identify muscle changes that occur in patients with LBP and evaluate the effects of rehabilitation treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":44017,"journal":{"name":"Galen Medical Journal","volume":"12 ","pages":"e2465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518224/pdf/GMJ-12-e2465.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Galen Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v12i.2465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to systematically review studies conducted on the application of sonoelastography (SE) to evaluate lumbopelvic muscle stiffness in patients with low back pain (LBP). All relevant articles were retrieved from the available electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and CINAHL, using the keywords "Sonoelastography", "Elasticity Imaging Technique", "Muscle Stiffness", "Modulus Elasticity", "Low Back Pain". After initial searches, studies that met the inclusion criteria (i.e., published in English and sonoelastography were used to assess lumbopelvic muscle stiffness in both patients with LBP and healthy individuals) were enrolled. Also, any animal research, abstract of the seminar and/or conference, and/or non-English-language article were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. In total, eight relevant studies were selected for review. Three studies were considered to have excellent quality, and five were considered fair quality using the PEDro scale. All reviewed studies have reported that SE can be considered a non-invasive method for quantifying changes in lumbopelvic muscle stiffness. Muscle stiffness was significantly higher in LBP patients compared to healthy persons, as well as across subgroups of LBP patients in various test postures (P˂0.05). Only one study was conducted on the reliability of SE in healthy individuals, while another examined the validity of SE imaging. The results of the present systematic review indicated that SE imaging is a reliable and valid tool to identify muscle changes that occur in patients with LBP and evaluate the effects of rehabilitation treatment.

下背痛患者的声弹性成像和腰叶肌僵硬:一项系统综述:。
本研究旨在系统回顾应用声弹性成像(SE)评估腰痛(LBP)患者腰叶肌强直的研究。所有相关文章都是从可用的电子数据库中检索的,包括PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、EMBASE、Cochrane library和CINAHL,使用关键词“声弹性成像”、“弹性成像技术”、“肌肉硬度”、“模量弹性”和“腰痛”。在初步搜索后,符合纳入标准的研究(即,使用英文发表的研究和声弹性成像来评估LBP患者和健康个体的腰叶肌强直)被纳入研究。此外,任何动物研究、研讨会和/或会议摘要和/或非英语文章都被排除在外。使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表评估研究的质量。总共选择了8项相关研究进行审查。使用PEDro量表,三项研究被认为质量良好,五项研究被视为质量尚可。所有综述的研究都报道了SE可以被认为是一种非侵入性的方法来量化腰痛肌肉硬度的变化。与健康人相比,LBP患者的肌肉僵硬程度明显更高,在不同测试姿势的LBP患者亚组中也是如此(P 0.05)。只有一项研究对健康人的SE的可靠性进行了研究,而另一项研究则检查了SE成像的有效性。本系统综述的结果表明,SE成像是识别LBP患者肌肉变化和评估康复治疗效果的可靠有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Galen Medical Journal
Galen Medical Journal MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: GMJ is open access, peer-reviewed journal in English and supported by Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD) Research Center of Fasa University of Medical Sciences that publishing by Salvia Medical Sciences Ltd. GMJ will consider all types of the following scientific papers for publication: - Editorial’s choice - Original Researches - Review articles - Case reports - Case series - Letter (to editors, to authors, etc) - Short communications - Medical Idea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信