Clinical assessment of various imaging systems for dental plaque scoring after the use of 3 different toothpastes.

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Imaging Science in Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-20 DOI:10.5624/isd.20220208
Simge Meseli, Sergen Ekenel, Bora Korkut, Burak Aksu, Dilek Tagtekin, Funda Yanikoglu
{"title":"Clinical assessment of various imaging systems for dental plaque scoring after the use of 3 different toothpastes.","authors":"Simge Meseli,&nbsp;Sergen Ekenel,&nbsp;Bora Korkut,&nbsp;Burak Aksu,&nbsp;Dilek Tagtekin,&nbsp;Funda Yanikoglu","doi":"10.5624/isd.20220208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted to compare dental plaque scores obtained through clinical examinations and various imaging techniques, as well as to assess the effectiveness of herbal and conventional toothpastes for plaque removal.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty volunteers were divided into 3 groups. Each group was given a different toothpaste (from 2 herbal toothpastes and a conventional toothpaste) with which to brush their teeth for 21 days. Both initially and after brushing, dental plaque samples were collected, and plaque on the buccal surfaces of anterior teeth was scored using several imaging systems after staining with a disclosing agent. Specifically, digital dental photography, intraoral digital scanning, and FluoreCam imaging were employed to capture intraoral images. The Turesky Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index was used for clinical examination and image analysis. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses and correlational assessments between clinical examination and imaging scores were conducted before and after toothpaste use. The Shapiro-Wilk test and Pearson correlations were utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lowest mean value was observed in the clinical examination without staining, while the highest was obtained using the FluoreCam method. No significant change was found in the level of any microorganism assessed following toothpaste use (<i>P</i><0.05), with the exception of a decrease in <i>S. mutans</i> levels after using conventional toothpaste (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Herbal toothpaste demonstrated plaque-removal effectiveness comparable to that of conventional toothpaste. The use of imaging methods for measuring plaque index has been suggested as a means to educate patients about plaque control and promote ongoing oral care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":"53 3","pages":"209-216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/3f/isd-53-209.PMC10548153.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to compare dental plaque scores obtained through clinical examinations and various imaging techniques, as well as to assess the effectiveness of herbal and conventional toothpastes for plaque removal.

Material and methods: Thirty volunteers were divided into 3 groups. Each group was given a different toothpaste (from 2 herbal toothpastes and a conventional toothpaste) with which to brush their teeth for 21 days. Both initially and after brushing, dental plaque samples were collected, and plaque on the buccal surfaces of anterior teeth was scored using several imaging systems after staining with a disclosing agent. Specifically, digital dental photography, intraoral digital scanning, and FluoreCam imaging were employed to capture intraoral images. The Turesky Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index was used for clinical examination and image analysis. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses and correlational assessments between clinical examination and imaging scores were conducted before and after toothpaste use. The Shapiro-Wilk test and Pearson correlations were utilized.

Results: The lowest mean value was observed in the clinical examination without staining, while the highest was obtained using the FluoreCam method. No significant change was found in the level of any microorganism assessed following toothpaste use (P<0.05), with the exception of a decrease in S. mutans levels after using conventional toothpaste (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Herbal toothpaste demonstrated plaque-removal effectiveness comparable to that of conventional toothpaste. The use of imaging methods for measuring plaque index has been suggested as a means to educate patients about plaque control and promote ongoing oral care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用3种不同牙膏后各种成像系统对牙菌斑评分的临床评估。
目的:本研究旨在比较通过临床检查和各种成像技术获得的牙菌斑评分,并评估草药牙膏和传统牙膏去除牙菌斑的有效性。材料和方法:30名志愿者被分为3组。每组使用不同的牙膏(2种草药牙膏和一种传统牙膏)刷牙21天。刷牙初期和刷牙后,均采集牙菌斑样本,并在用披露剂染色后,使用几种成像系统对前牙颊面上的牙菌斑进行评分。具体而言,采用数字牙科摄影、口腔内数字扫描和FluoreCam成像来捕捉口腔内图像。Turesky改良Quigley-Hein菌斑指数用于临床检查和图像分析。在使用牙膏前后进行定量聚合酶链式反应分析,并对临床检查和影像学评分进行相关性评估。采用Shapiro-Wilk检验和Pearson相关性。结果:在没有染色的临床检查中观察到最低的平均值,而使用FluoreCam方法获得最高的平均值。使用牙膏后评估的任何微生物水平均未发现显著变化(使用传统牙膏后的PS变位素水平(结论:草药牙膏的牙菌斑去除效果与传统牙膏相当。有人建议使用成像方法测量牙菌斑指数,以此教育患者控制牙菌斑,并促进持续的口腔护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信