Closing the Gender Gap Among Canadian Ophthalmology Societies.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1080/08820538.2023.2253898
Mahraz Parvand, Maryam Eslami, Natalie Doughty, Sonia N Yeung, Femida Kherani
{"title":"Closing the Gender Gap Among Canadian Ophthalmology Societies.","authors":"Mahraz Parvand, Maryam Eslami, Natalie Doughty, Sonia N Yeung, Femida Kherani","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2023.2253898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate gender distribution in Canadian ophthalmology societies' leadership and to determine associations between gender, academic productivity, and institutional rank.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified members and assessed their gender composition using publicly available updated webpages. SCOPUS database was used to gather research metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, data was collected from 12 Canadian ophthalmology societies, which included 277 executive committee members. Of these, 70.5% (196) were male and 29.1% (81) were female (<i>p</i> < .0001). Males were significantly more prevalent in presidential leadership roles (39 males vs. 23 females, <i>p</i> = .02), while females were more represented in other leadership categories (77 females vs. 61 males, <i>p</i> = .03). The Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS) showed an upward trend in female representation from 19.2% in 2016 to 42.3% in 2021. Research productivity showed a positive correlation with society leadership rank, with a correlation coefficient of 0.732 for the m-index (<i>p</i> < .001) and 0.356 for the h-index (<i>p</i> < .05). Academic rank was also positively correlated with society leadership rank, with a correlation coefficient of 0.536 (<i>p</i> < .001). There was no significant difference in h-index (12.7 ± 1.0 for males vs. 13.8 ± 1.5 for females, <i>p</i> = .85) or number of publications (48.6 ± 5.1 for males vs. 60.0 ± 11.3 for females, <i>p</i> = .83) between male and female executive members, but females had a higher m-index (0.67 ± 0.05) compared to males (0.58 ± 0.03, <i>p</i> < .05). In academic rank, males were more likely to be associate professors (25% vs. 5% for females, <i>p</i> = .0001) or instructors (14.8% vs. 6.3% for females, <i>p</i> = .05), while a higher proportion of females held assistant professor positions (47.5% for females vs. 30.1% for males, <i>p</i> = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, we found that males were more prevalent in executive positions, particularly in presidential roles among Canadian ophthalmology societies. The gender distribution in leadership reflected the gender composition of practicing ophthalmologists in Canada. There was a positive correlation between research productivity and society rank, as well as academic position and society rank. Male and female executive members had similar h-index and number of publications, but females had a higher m-index. These findings highlight the need for continued efforts to address gender disparities in ophthalmology leadership.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2023.2253898","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate gender distribution in Canadian ophthalmology societies' leadership and to determine associations between gender, academic productivity, and institutional rank.

Methods: We identified members and assessed their gender composition using publicly available updated webpages. SCOPUS database was used to gather research metrics.

Results: In this study, data was collected from 12 Canadian ophthalmology societies, which included 277 executive committee members. Of these, 70.5% (196) were male and 29.1% (81) were female (p < .0001). Males were significantly more prevalent in presidential leadership roles (39 males vs. 23 females, p = .02), while females were more represented in other leadership categories (77 females vs. 61 males, p = .03). The Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS) showed an upward trend in female representation from 19.2% in 2016 to 42.3% in 2021. Research productivity showed a positive correlation with society leadership rank, with a correlation coefficient of 0.732 for the m-index (p < .001) and 0.356 for the h-index (p < .05). Academic rank was also positively correlated with society leadership rank, with a correlation coefficient of 0.536 (p < .001). There was no significant difference in h-index (12.7 ± 1.0 for males vs. 13.8 ± 1.5 for females, p = .85) or number of publications (48.6 ± 5.1 for males vs. 60.0 ± 11.3 for females, p = .83) between male and female executive members, but females had a higher m-index (0.67 ± 0.05) compared to males (0.58 ± 0.03, p < .05). In academic rank, males were more likely to be associate professors (25% vs. 5% for females, p = .0001) or instructors (14.8% vs. 6.3% for females, p = .05), while a higher proportion of females held assistant professor positions (47.5% for females vs. 30.1% for males, p = .006).

Conclusion: In this study, we found that males were more prevalent in executive positions, particularly in presidential roles among Canadian ophthalmology societies. The gender distribution in leadership reflected the gender composition of practicing ophthalmologists in Canada. There was a positive correlation between research productivity and society rank, as well as academic position and society rank. Male and female executive members had similar h-index and number of publications, but females had a higher m-index. These findings highlight the need for continued efforts to address gender disparities in ophthalmology leadership.

缩小加拿大眼科学会之间的性别差距。
目的:评估加拿大眼科学会领导层的性别分布,并确定性别、学术生产力和机构级别之间的关系。方法:我们使用公开更新的网页确定成员并评估他们的性别构成。SCOPUS数据库用于收集研究指标。结果:在这项研究中,数据来自12个加拿大眼科学会,其中包括277名执行委员会成员。其中,70.5%(196)为男性,29.1%(81)为女性(p p = .02),而女性在其他领导类别中的代表性更高(77名女性对61名男性,p = .03)。加拿大眼科学会(COS)显示,女性比例呈上升趋势,从2016年的19.2%上升到2021年的42.3%。研究生产力与社会领导地位呈正相关,m指数的相关系数为0.732(p p p p = .85)或出版物数量(48.6 ± 男性5.1对60.0 ± 11.3女性,p = .83),但女性的m指数较高(0.67 ± 0.05)与男性(0.58 ± 0.03,p p = .0001)或教员(14.8%对6.3%,女性,p = .05),而担任助理教授职位的女性比例更高(女性47.5%,男性30.1%,p = .006)。结论:在这项研究中,我们发现,在加拿大眼科学会中,男性在高管职位上更为普遍,尤其是在总统职位上。领导层中的性别分布反映了加拿大执业眼科医生的性别构成。研究生产力与社会等级、学术地位与社会等级呈正相关。男性和女性执行成员的h指数和出版物数量相似,但女性的m指数更高。这些发现强调了继续努力解决眼科领导层性别差异的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信