The impact of healthcare systems on the clinical diagnosis and disease-modifying treatment usage in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis: a real-world perspective in five registries across Europe.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2023-09-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864231198963
Richard Nicholas, Jeff Rodgers, James Witts, Annalaura Lerede, Tim Friede, Jan Hillert, Lars Forsberg, Anna Glaser, Ali Manouchehrinia, Ryan Ramanujam, Tim Spelman, Pernilla Klyve, Jiri Drahota, Dana Horakova, Hanna Joensen, Luigi Pontieri, Melinda Magyari, David Ellenberger, Alexander Stahmann, Helmut Butzkueven, Anneke Van Der Walt, Vladimir Bezlyak, Carol Lines, Rod Middleton
{"title":"The impact of healthcare systems on the clinical diagnosis and disease-modifying treatment usage in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis: a real-world perspective in five registries across Europe.","authors":"Richard Nicholas,&nbsp;Jeff Rodgers,&nbsp;James Witts,&nbsp;Annalaura Lerede,&nbsp;Tim Friede,&nbsp;Jan Hillert,&nbsp;Lars Forsberg,&nbsp;Anna Glaser,&nbsp;Ali Manouchehrinia,&nbsp;Ryan Ramanujam,&nbsp;Tim Spelman,&nbsp;Pernilla Klyve,&nbsp;Jiri Drahota,&nbsp;Dana Horakova,&nbsp;Hanna Joensen,&nbsp;Luigi Pontieri,&nbsp;Melinda Magyari,&nbsp;David Ellenberger,&nbsp;Alexander Stahmann,&nbsp;Helmut Butzkueven,&nbsp;Anneke Van Der Walt,&nbsp;Vladimir Bezlyak,&nbsp;Carol Lines,&nbsp;Rod Middleton","doi":"10.1177/17562864231198963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prescribing guidance for disease-modifying treatment (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is centred on a clinical diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). DMT prescription guidelines and monitoring vary across countries. Standardising the approach to diagnosis of disease course, for example, assigning RRMS or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) diagnoses, allows examination of the impact of health system characteristics on the stated clinical diagnosis and treatment access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed registry data from six cohorts in five countries (Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Sweden and United Kingdom) on patients with an initial diagnosis of RRMS. We standardised our approach utilising a pre-existing algorithm (DecisionTree, DT) to determine patient diagnoses of RRMS or secondary progressive MS (SPMS). We identified five global drivers of DMT prescribing: Provision, Availability, Funding, Monitoring and Audit, data were analysed against these concepts using meta-analysis and univariate meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 64,235 patients, we found variations in DMT use between countries, with higher usage in RRMS and lower usage in SPMS, with correspondingly lower usage in the UK compared to other registers. Factors such as female gender (<i>p</i> = 0.041), increasing disability via Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (<i>p</i> = 0.004), and the presence of monitoring (<i>p</i> = 0.029) in SPMS influenced the likelihood of receiving DMTs. Standardising the diagnosis revealed differences in reclassification rates from clinical RRMS to DT-SPMS, with Sweden having the lowest rate Sweden (Sweden 0.009, range: Denmark 0.103 - UK portal 0.311). Those with higher EDSS at index (<i>p</i> < 0.03) and female gender (<i>p</i> < 0.049) were more likely to be reclassified from RRMS to DT-SPMS. The study also explored the impact of diagnosis on DMT usage in clinical SPMS, finding that the prescribing environment and auditing practices affected access to treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This highlights the importance of a healthcare system's approach to verifying the clinical label of MS course in facilitating appropriate prescribing, with some flexibility allowed in uncertain cases to ensure continued access to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f7/bc/10.1177_17562864231198963.PMC10524069.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864231198963","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prescribing guidance for disease-modifying treatment (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is centred on a clinical diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). DMT prescription guidelines and monitoring vary across countries. Standardising the approach to diagnosis of disease course, for example, assigning RRMS or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) diagnoses, allows examination of the impact of health system characteristics on the stated clinical diagnosis and treatment access.

Methods: We analysed registry data from six cohorts in five countries (Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Sweden and United Kingdom) on patients with an initial diagnosis of RRMS. We standardised our approach utilising a pre-existing algorithm (DecisionTree, DT) to determine patient diagnoses of RRMS or secondary progressive MS (SPMS). We identified five global drivers of DMT prescribing: Provision, Availability, Funding, Monitoring and Audit, data were analysed against these concepts using meta-analysis and univariate meta-regression.

Results: In 64,235 patients, we found variations in DMT use between countries, with higher usage in RRMS and lower usage in SPMS, with correspondingly lower usage in the UK compared to other registers. Factors such as female gender (p = 0.041), increasing disability via Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (p = 0.004), and the presence of monitoring (p = 0.029) in SPMS influenced the likelihood of receiving DMTs. Standardising the diagnosis revealed differences in reclassification rates from clinical RRMS to DT-SPMS, with Sweden having the lowest rate Sweden (Sweden 0.009, range: Denmark 0.103 - UK portal 0.311). Those with higher EDSS at index (p < 0.03) and female gender (p < 0.049) were more likely to be reclassified from RRMS to DT-SPMS. The study also explored the impact of diagnosis on DMT usage in clinical SPMS, finding that the prescribing environment and auditing practices affected access to treatment.

Discussion: This highlights the importance of a healthcare system's approach to verifying the clinical label of MS course in facilitating appropriate prescribing, with some flexibility allowed in uncertain cases to ensure continued access to treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医疗保健系统对复发性多发性硬化症临床诊断和疾病改良治疗使用的影响:欧洲五个注册中心的现实世界视角。
引言:多发性硬化症(MS)疾病改良治疗(DMT)的处方指南集中在复发-缓解型MS(RRMS)的临床诊断上。DMT处方指南和监测因国家而异。将病程诊断方法标准化,例如,分配RRMS或继发性进行性MS(SPMS)诊断,可以检查卫生系统特征对所述临床诊断和治疗途径的影响。方法:我们分析了来自五个国家(捷克共和国、丹麦、德国、瑞典和英国)的六个队列的初步诊断为RRMS患者的登记数据。我们利用预先存在的算法(决策树,DT)对我们的方法进行了标准化,以确定患者对RRMS或继发性进行性MS(SPMS)的诊断。我们确定了DMT处方的五个全球驱动因素:供应、可用性、资金、监测和审计,并使用荟萃分析和单变量荟萃分析对这些概念的数据进行了分析。结果:在64235名患者中,我们发现国家之间DMT的使用存在差异,RRMS的使用率较高,SPMS的使用率较低,与其他寄存器相比,在英国的使用量相应地更低。女性等因素(p = 0.041),通过扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)得分增加残疾(p = 0.004),并且存在监测(p = 0.029)影响接收DMT的可能性。标准化诊断显示,从临床RRMS到DT-SPMS的重新分类率存在差异,瑞典的重新分类比率最低(瑞典0.009,范围:丹麦0.103-英国门户网站0.311) p 讨论:这突出了医疗系统验证多发性硬化症病程临床标签的方法在促进适当处方方面的重要性,在不确定的情况下允许一定的灵活性,以确保继续获得治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信