Physics-Informed Discretization for Reproducible and Robust Radiomic Feature Extraction Using Quantitative MRI.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Investigative Radiology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000001026
Walter Zhao, Zheyuan Hu, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Gregor Körzdörfer, Mathias Nittka, Christos Davatzikos, Satish E Viswanath, Xiaofeng Wang, Chaitra Badve, Dan Ma
{"title":"Physics-Informed Discretization for Reproducible and Robust Radiomic Feature Extraction Using Quantitative MRI.","authors":"Walter Zhao, Zheyuan Hu, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Gregor Körzdörfer, Mathias Nittka, Christos Davatzikos, Satish E Viswanath, Xiaofeng Wang, Chaitra Badve, Dan Ma","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Given the limited repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features derived from weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), there may be significant advantages to using radiomics in conjunction with quantitative MRI. This study introduces a novel physics-informed discretization (PID) method for reproducible radiomic feature extraction and evaluates its performance using quantitative MRI sequences including magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multiscanner, scan-rescan dataset comprising whole-brain 3D quantitative (MRF T1, MRF T2, and ADC) and weighted MRI (T1w MPRAGE, T2w SPACE, and T2w FLAIR) from 5 healthy subjects was prospectively acquired. Subjects underwent 2 repeated acquisitions on 3 distinct 3 T scanners each, for a total of 6 scans per subject (30 total scans). First-order statistical (n = 23) and second-order texture (n = 74) radiomic features were extracted from 56 brain tissue regions of interest using the proposed PID method (for quantitative MRI) and conventional fixed bin number (FBN) discretization (for quantitative MRI and weighted MRI). Interscanner radiomic feature reproducibility was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the effect of image sequence (eg, MRF T1 vs T1w MPRAGE), as well as image discretization method (ie, PID vs FBN), on radiomic feature reproducibility was assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The robustness of PID and FBN discretization to segmentation error was evaluated by simulating segmentation differences in brainstem regions of interest. Radiomic features with ICCs greater than 0.75 following simulated segmentation were determined to be robust to segmentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First-order features demonstrated higher reproducibility in quantitative MRI than weighted MRI sequences, with 30% (n = 7/23) features being more reproducible in MRF T1 and MRF T2 than weighted MRI. Gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) texture features extracted from MRF T1 and MRF T2 were significantly more reproducible using PID compared with FBN discretization; for all quantitative MRI sequences, PID yielded the highest number of texture features with excellent reproducibility (ICC > 0.9). Comparing texture reproducibility of quantitative and weighted MRI, a greater proportion of MRF T1 (n = 225/370, 61%) and MRF T2 (n = 150/370, 41%) texture features had excellent reproducibility (ICC > 0.9) compared with T1w MPRAGE (n = 148/370, 40%), ADC (n = 115/370, 32%), T2w SPACE (n = 98/370, 27%), and FLAIR (n = 102/370, 28%). Physics-informed discretization was also more robust than FBN discretization to segmentation error, as 46% (n = 103/222, 46%) of texture features extracted from quantitative MRI using PID were robust to simulated 6 mm segmentation shift compared with 19% (n = 42/222, 19%) of weighted MRI texture features extracted using FBN discretization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed PID method yields radiomic features extracted from quantitative MRI sequences that are more reproducible and robust than radiomic features extracted from weighted MRI using conventional (FBN) discretization approaches. Quantitative MRI sequences also demonstrated greater scan-rescan robustness and first-order feature reproducibility than weighted MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"359-371"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Given the limited repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features derived from weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), there may be significant advantages to using radiomics in conjunction with quantitative MRI. This study introduces a novel physics-informed discretization (PID) method for reproducible radiomic feature extraction and evaluates its performance using quantitative MRI sequences including magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping.

Materials and methods: A multiscanner, scan-rescan dataset comprising whole-brain 3D quantitative (MRF T1, MRF T2, and ADC) and weighted MRI (T1w MPRAGE, T2w SPACE, and T2w FLAIR) from 5 healthy subjects was prospectively acquired. Subjects underwent 2 repeated acquisitions on 3 distinct 3 T scanners each, for a total of 6 scans per subject (30 total scans). First-order statistical (n = 23) and second-order texture (n = 74) radiomic features were extracted from 56 brain tissue regions of interest using the proposed PID method (for quantitative MRI) and conventional fixed bin number (FBN) discretization (for quantitative MRI and weighted MRI). Interscanner radiomic feature reproducibility was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the effect of image sequence (eg, MRF T1 vs T1w MPRAGE), as well as image discretization method (ie, PID vs FBN), on radiomic feature reproducibility was assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The robustness of PID and FBN discretization to segmentation error was evaluated by simulating segmentation differences in brainstem regions of interest. Radiomic features with ICCs greater than 0.75 following simulated segmentation were determined to be robust to segmentation.

Results: First-order features demonstrated higher reproducibility in quantitative MRI than weighted MRI sequences, with 30% (n = 7/23) features being more reproducible in MRF T1 and MRF T2 than weighted MRI. Gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) texture features extracted from MRF T1 and MRF T2 were significantly more reproducible using PID compared with FBN discretization; for all quantitative MRI sequences, PID yielded the highest number of texture features with excellent reproducibility (ICC > 0.9). Comparing texture reproducibility of quantitative and weighted MRI, a greater proportion of MRF T1 (n = 225/370, 61%) and MRF T2 (n = 150/370, 41%) texture features had excellent reproducibility (ICC > 0.9) compared with T1w MPRAGE (n = 148/370, 40%), ADC (n = 115/370, 32%), T2w SPACE (n = 98/370, 27%), and FLAIR (n = 102/370, 28%). Physics-informed discretization was also more robust than FBN discretization to segmentation error, as 46% (n = 103/222, 46%) of texture features extracted from quantitative MRI using PID were robust to simulated 6 mm segmentation shift compared with 19% (n = 42/222, 19%) of weighted MRI texture features extracted using FBN discretization.

Conclusions: The proposed PID method yields radiomic features extracted from quantitative MRI sequences that are more reproducible and robust than radiomic features extracted from weighted MRI using conventional (FBN) discretization approaches. Quantitative MRI sequences also demonstrated greater scan-rescan robustness and first-order feature reproducibility than weighted MRI.

使用定量MRI进行可再现和稳健放射特征提取的物理知情离散化。
目的:鉴于加权磁共振成像(MRI)放射组学特征的可重复性和再现性有限,将放射组学与定量MRI结合使用可能具有显著优势。本研究介绍了一种新的用于可重复放射学特征提取的物理知情离散化(PID)方法,并使用包括磁共振指纹(MRF)和表观扩散系数(ADC)映射在内的定量MRI序列来评估其性能。材料和方法:前瞻性获取5名健康受试者的多扫描、扫描-再扫描数据集,包括全脑3D定量(MRF T1、MRF T2和ADC)和加权MRI(T1w MPRAGE、T2w SPACE和T2w FLAIR)。受试者在3台不同的3T扫描仪上进行了2次重复采集,每个受试者共进行6次扫描(共30次扫描)。使用所提出的PID方法(用于定量MRI)和传统的固定仓数(FBN)离散化(用于定量MRI和加权MRI),从56个感兴趣的脑组织区域提取一阶统计(n=23)和二阶纹理(n=74)放射学特征。使用组内相关系数(ICC)测量扫描仪间放射学特征的再现性,并使用重复测量方差分析评估图像序列(例如,MRF T1与T1w MPRAGE)以及图像离散化方法(即,PID与FBN)对放射学特征再现性的影响。通过模拟脑干感兴趣区域的分割差异来评估PID和FBN离散化对分割误差的鲁棒性。模拟分割后ICCs大于0.75的放射学特征被确定为对分割具有鲁棒性。结果:与加权MRI序列相比,一阶特征在定量MRI中表现出更高的再现性,其中30%(n=7/23)的特征在MRF T1和MRF T2中比加权MRI更具再现性。与FBN离散化相比,使用PID从MRF T1和MRF T2中提取的灰度共生矩阵(GLCM)纹理特征的可重复性显著提高;对于所有定量MRI序列,PID产生的纹理特征数量最多,具有良好的再现性(ICC>0.9)。比较定量和加权MRI的纹理再现性,与T1w MPRAGE(n=148/370,40%)相比,MRF T1(n=225/370,61%)和MRF T2(n=150/370,41%)的纹理特征具有良好的可再现性(ICC>0.9),ADC(n=115/370,32%)、T2w SPACE(n=98/370,27%)和FLAIR(n=102/370,28%)。物理知情离散化对分割误差的鲁棒性也比FBN离散化更强,因为使用PID从定量MRI中提取的纹理特征中有46%(n=103/222,46%)对模拟的6mm分割偏移是鲁棒的,而使用FBN离散提取的加权MRI纹理特征中只有19%(n=42/222,19%)对分割偏移是稳健的。结论:所提出的PID方法产生了从定量MRI序列中提取的放射学特征,该特征比使用传统(FBN)离散化方法从加权MRI中提取的放射性特征更具可重复性和鲁棒性。定量MRI序列也显示出比加权MRI更大的扫描-再扫描稳健性和一阶特征再现性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信