Patient Safety and Surgery: the Experience of the Lombardy Region. A Project on External Evaluation of Best Practices Implementation.

Igiene e sanita pubblica Pub Date : 2023-07-01
Luciana Bevilacqua, Giulia Domeniconi, Chiara Picchetti, Davide Mozzanica, Elisabetta Brivio, Luca Merlino Luca Merlino, Liviana Scotti, Romina Colciago, Enrico Comberti, Anna D'Andrea, Paola Garancini, Maristella Moscheni, Chiara Oggioni, Cristina Oppezzo, Paolo Trucco, Antonio Vitello, Simona Amato, Enrico Burato
{"title":"Patient Safety and Surgery: the Experience of the Lombardy Region. A Project on External Evaluation of Best Practices Implementation.","authors":"Luciana Bevilacqua,&nbsp;Giulia Domeniconi,&nbsp;Chiara Picchetti,&nbsp;Davide Mozzanica,&nbsp;Elisabetta Brivio,&nbsp;Luca Merlino Luca Merlino,&nbsp;Liviana Scotti,&nbsp;Romina Colciago,&nbsp;Enrico Comberti,&nbsp;Anna D'Andrea,&nbsp;Paola Garancini,&nbsp;Maristella Moscheni,&nbsp;Chiara Oggioni,&nbsp;Cristina Oppezzo,&nbsp;Paolo Trucco,&nbsp;Antonio Vitello,&nbsp;Simona Amato,&nbsp;Enrico Burato","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meta-analysis studies published over the past 20 years document that approximately 10 -14 % of hospitalised patients have an adverse event in Surgery and at least half of these adverse events are considered preventable using the current standards of care. In order to improve the safety of surgical patients and increasing adherence to current standard of care in surgery, including communication within the team and teamwork, in 2007 the WHO launched the campaign &quot;Safe Surgery Saves Lives&quot;. The WHO has also built a checklist for safety in the operating room containing 19 item in support of the operating team. The Ministry of Health in 2009 has taken the instruments produced by WHO in the \"Guide to Safety in the operating room: Recommendations and Checklist\". Studies conducted in industrialized countries report a strong heterogeneity in compliance to the check list for the surgical safety, with a range of between 38% and 96%. The aim of this project was to adopt the methodology of the external &quot;peer review&quot; to improve quality and patient safety applied to the surgical process and assess the degree of implementation of good practice in the operating room, both in public and private structures. Between 2015 and 2018 we have carried out 16 external evaluation visits. These visits included a first plenary session followed by the inspection of the operating theaters identified and a second plenary session. Several factors emerged during the visits; these factors represent both the strengths and criticalities of the organizations. The creation of a team of experts, coordinated by the Lombardy Region with the role of leadership, using the \"peer review\" methodology, is the leverage to promote among operators the growth of awareness of the usefulness of the tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":73329,"journal":{"name":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","volume":"80 4","pages":"81-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meta-analysis studies published over the past 20 years document that approximately 10 -14 % of hospitalised patients have an adverse event in Surgery and at least half of these adverse events are considered preventable using the current standards of care. In order to improve the safety of surgical patients and increasing adherence to current standard of care in surgery, including communication within the team and teamwork, in 2007 the WHO launched the campaign "Safe Surgery Saves Lives". The WHO has also built a checklist for safety in the operating room containing 19 item in support of the operating team. The Ministry of Health in 2009 has taken the instruments produced by WHO in the "Guide to Safety in the operating room: Recommendations and Checklist". Studies conducted in industrialized countries report a strong heterogeneity in compliance to the check list for the surgical safety, with a range of between 38% and 96%. The aim of this project was to adopt the methodology of the external "peer review" to improve quality and patient safety applied to the surgical process and assess the degree of implementation of good practice in the operating room, both in public and private structures. Between 2015 and 2018 we have carried out 16 external evaluation visits. These visits included a first plenary session followed by the inspection of the operating theaters identified and a second plenary session. Several factors emerged during the visits; these factors represent both the strengths and criticalities of the organizations. The creation of a team of experts, coordinated by the Lombardy Region with the role of leadership, using the "peer review" methodology, is the leverage to promote among operators the growth of awareness of the usefulness of the tools.

病人安全与手术:伦巴第大区的经验。最佳做法执行情况外部评价项目。
过去20年发表的荟萃分析研究表明,大约10-14%的住院患者在外科手术中发生了不良事件,根据目前的护理标准,这些不良事件中至少有一半是可以预防的。为了提高手术患者的安全性并增加对当前手术护理标准的遵守,包括团队内部的沟通和团队合作,世界卫生组织于2007年发起了“;安全手术拯救生命”;。世界卫生组织还制定了手术室安全检查表,其中包括19项,以支持手术团队。2009年,卫生部在《手术室安全指南:建议和检查表》中采用了世界卫生组织生产的仪器。在工业化国家进行的研究报告称,手术安全性检查表的依从性存在很大的异质性,范围在38%至96%之间。该项目的目的是采用外部“;同行评审”;以提高手术过程中的质量和患者安全,并评估公共和私人结构中手术室良好做法的实施程度。2015年至2018年间,我们进行了16次外部评估访问。这些访问包括第一次全体会议,随后视察了确定的手术室,以及第二次全体会议。访问期间出现了几个因素;这些因素代表了组织的优势和批判性。建立一个由伦巴第大区协调并发挥领导作用的专家团队,采用“同行评审”方法,是促进运营商提高对工具有用性认识的杠杆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信