Photopatch testing in Singapore: A 10-year retrospective study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Shi Yu Derek Lim, Anthony Teik-Jin Goon, Yung Hian Leow, Tricia Yi Rui Chong, Eugene Sern-Ting Tan, Wei Na Suzanne Cheng
{"title":"Photopatch testing in Singapore: A 10-year retrospective study.","authors":"Shi Yu Derek Lim, Anthony Teik-Jin Goon, Yung Hian Leow, Tricia Yi Rui Chong, Eugene Sern-Ting Tan, Wei Na Suzanne Cheng","doi":"10.1111/phpp.12912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Photopatch testing represents the gold standard for the diagnosis of photoallergic contact dermatitis (PACD). We aimed to identify common photoallergens in our tertiary dermatological referral centre from 2012 to 2021, to compare this to the preceding period studied, and data from other communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of all 90 patients who underwent photopatch testing at the National Skin Centre, Singapore, between 2012 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 90 patients, 19 (21.1%) were male, and the mean age was 41.6 years. Eighty-four (93.3%) underwent testing to our standard sunscreen series, 10 (11.1%) to our extended series, and 73 (81.1%) to their own items. Seventeen (18.9%) were diagnosed with PACD (i.e., photocontact allergy with present or past relevance), 12 (13.3%) with ACD, and 4 (4.4%) with photoaugmented ACD. Relevant reactions were commonest to oxybenzone (8, 9.5%) and mexenone (3, 3.6%). Eleven (15.1%) had PACD to their own items, with 3 of 4 (75%) tested to ketoprofen diagnosed with PACD and the remaining 1 (25%) with photoaugmented ACD. Age, race, sex, atopy, and site of involvement were not associated with photocontact allergy. Compared to the preceding time period, the overall frequency of photocontact allergy and PACD decreased, but rates of photoallergic reactions to individual photoallergens were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Organic ultraviolet absorbers such as oxybenzone and mexenone remained the most relevant photoallergens. Personal item testing was valuable, and testing to ketoprofen should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":20123,"journal":{"name":"Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"642-647"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Photopatch testing represents the gold standard for the diagnosis of photoallergic contact dermatitis (PACD). We aimed to identify common photoallergens in our tertiary dermatological referral centre from 2012 to 2021, to compare this to the preceding period studied, and data from other communities.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all 90 patients who underwent photopatch testing at the National Skin Centre, Singapore, between 2012 and 2021.

Results: Of 90 patients, 19 (21.1%) were male, and the mean age was 41.6 years. Eighty-four (93.3%) underwent testing to our standard sunscreen series, 10 (11.1%) to our extended series, and 73 (81.1%) to their own items. Seventeen (18.9%) were diagnosed with PACD (i.e., photocontact allergy with present or past relevance), 12 (13.3%) with ACD, and 4 (4.4%) with photoaugmented ACD. Relevant reactions were commonest to oxybenzone (8, 9.5%) and mexenone (3, 3.6%). Eleven (15.1%) had PACD to their own items, with 3 of 4 (75%) tested to ketoprofen diagnosed with PACD and the remaining 1 (25%) with photoaugmented ACD. Age, race, sex, atopy, and site of involvement were not associated with photocontact allergy. Compared to the preceding time period, the overall frequency of photocontact allergy and PACD decreased, but rates of photoallergic reactions to individual photoallergens were not significantly different.

Conclusion: Organic ultraviolet absorbers such as oxybenzone and mexenone remained the most relevant photoallergens. Personal item testing was valuable, and testing to ketoprofen should be considered.

新加坡的Photopatch测试:一项为期10年的回顾性研究。
背景:光贴试验是诊断光过敏性接触性皮炎(PACD)的金标准。我们的目标是在2012年至2021年的三级皮肤科转诊中心确定常见的光过敏原,并将其与前一研究时期以及其他社区的数据进行比较。方法:我们对2012年至2021年间在新加坡国家皮肤中心接受光镜检查的所有90名患者进行了回顾性审查。结果:在90名患者中,19名(21.1%)为男性,平均年龄为41.6岁 年。84个(93.3%)接受了我们的标准防晒系列测试,10个(11.1%)接受了扩展系列测试,73个(81.1%)接受了自己的产品测试。17人(18.9%)被诊断为PACD(即与当前或过去相关的光接触性过敏),12人(13.3%)被确诊为ACD,4人(4.4%)被误诊为光增敏ACD。相关反应最常见的是氧苯酮(8,9.5%)和美塞酮(3,3.6%)。11人(15.1%)对自己的项目进行了PACD,其中3人(75%)对酮洛芬进行了测试,诊断为PACD,其余1人(25%)患有光增强ACD。年龄、种族、性别、特应性和受累部位与光接触性变态反应无关。与之前的时间段相比,光接触过敏和PACD的总体频率降低,但对单个光过敏原的光过敏反应率没有显著差异。结论:有机紫外线吸收剂,如氧苯酮和美烯酮仍然是最相关的光致过敏原。个人物品测试很有价值,应考虑对酮洛芬进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is a forum for new information about the direct and distant effects of electromagnetic radiation (ultraviolet, visible and infrared) mediated through skin. The divisions of the editorial board reflect areas of specific interest: aging, carcinogenesis, immunology, instrumentation and optics, lasers, photodynamic therapy, photosensitivity, pigmentation and therapy. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine includes original articles, reviews, communications and editorials. Original articles may include the investigation of experimental or pathological processes in humans or animals in vivo or the investigation of radiation effects in cells or tissues in vitro. Methodology need have no limitation; rather, it should be appropriate to the question addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信