Resilience, Coping, and the Covid-19 Pandemic Across the Globe - an Update: What Have we Learned?

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Craig P Polizzi, Charlie W McDonald, Fiona G Sleight, Steven Jay Lynn
{"title":"Resilience, Coping, and the Covid-19 Pandemic Across the Globe - an Update: What Have we Learned?","authors":"Craig P Polizzi,&nbsp;Charlie W McDonald,&nbsp;Fiona G Sleight,&nbsp;Steven Jay Lynn","doi":"10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic is a mass traumatic event that has universally and indiscriminately negatively affected the world. The adverse consequences of the pandemic have globally impacted psychological health and well-being via increased stressors, such as uncertainty, health anxieties, and financial instability. During the initial months of the pandemic, we (Polizzi et al., 2020) identified coping strategies that may be well-suited to address the sequelae of the pandemic. These strategies included behavioral activation, acceptance-based coping, mindfulness practice, and loving-kindness meditation. We argued that these coping skills may foster resilience and recovery during the pandemic by generating a sense of social connection, encouraging meaning-making, and enhancing feelings of control amid uncertainty. Three years later, we update our initial suggestions by providing a narrative review that considers empirical evidence collected during the pandemic to support the utility of the previously identified coping strategies as well as additional strategies. We also discuss cross-cultural similarities and differences among these strategies and how research supports their application across diverse countries and groups. Finally, we conclude by synthesizing the literature within a regulatory flexibility framework that emphasizes flexible skill implementation with respect to sensitivity to context, coping repertoires, and feedback from the environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46700,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544248/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic is a mass traumatic event that has universally and indiscriminately negatively affected the world. The adverse consequences of the pandemic have globally impacted psychological health and well-being via increased stressors, such as uncertainty, health anxieties, and financial instability. During the initial months of the pandemic, we (Polizzi et al., 2020) identified coping strategies that may be well-suited to address the sequelae of the pandemic. These strategies included behavioral activation, acceptance-based coping, mindfulness practice, and loving-kindness meditation. We argued that these coping skills may foster resilience and recovery during the pandemic by generating a sense of social connection, encouraging meaning-making, and enhancing feelings of control amid uncertainty. Three years later, we update our initial suggestions by providing a narrative review that considers empirical evidence collected during the pandemic to support the utility of the previously identified coping strategies as well as additional strategies. We also discuss cross-cultural similarities and differences among these strategies and how research supports their application across diverse countries and groups. Finally, we conclude by synthesizing the literature within a regulatory flexibility framework that emphasizes flexible skill implementation with respect to sensitivity to context, coping repertoires, and feedback from the environment.

韧性、应对和全球新冠肺炎大流行-更新:我们学到了什么?
SARS-CoV-2(新冠肺炎)大流行是一个大规模创伤性事件,对世界产生了普遍和不加区别的负面影响。疫情的不利后果通过不确定性、健康焦虑和金融不稳定等压力源的增加,在全球范围内影响了心理健康和福祉。在大流行的最初几个月,我们(Polizzi等人,2020)确定了可能非常适合解决大流行后遗症的应对策略。这些策略包括行为激活、基于接受的应对、正念练习和仁爱冥想。我们认为,这些应对技能可以通过产生社会联系感、鼓励意义创造和增强不确定性中的控制感,在疫情期间培养韧性和恢复力。三年后,我们通过提供叙述性审查来更新我们的初步建议,该审查考虑了在疫情期间收集的经验证据,以支持先前确定的应对策略以及其他策略的效用。我们还讨论了这些策略之间的跨文化异同,以及研究如何支持它们在不同国家和群体中的应用。最后,我们通过在监管灵活性框架内综合文献得出结论,该框架强调在对环境的敏感性、应对策略和环境反馈方面的灵活技能实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychiatry
Clinical Neuropsychiatry CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信