Bintrafusp Alfa With CCRT Followed by Bintrafusp Alfa Versus Placebo With CCRT Followed by Durvalumab in Patients With Unresectable Stage III NSCLC: A Phase 2 Randomized Study

IF 21 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Everett E. Vokes MD , Francoise Mornex MD, PhD , Ahmet Sezer MD, PhD , Ying Cheng MD, PhD , Jian Fang MD, PhD , David Vicente Baz MD, PhD , Timucin Cil MD, PhD , Alex A. Adjei MD, PhD , Myung-Ju Ahn MD, PhD , Fabrice Barlesi MD, PhD , Enriqueta Felip MD, PhD , Edward B. Garon MD, MS , Francois Audhuy MSc , Rena Ito MD, PhD , Masashi Sato MSc , S. Peter Eggleton MB , Claudio Marcelo Martin MD, PhD , Martin Reck MD, PhD , Clifford G. Robinson MD , Luis Paz-Ares MD, PhD
{"title":"Bintrafusp Alfa With CCRT Followed by Bintrafusp Alfa Versus Placebo With CCRT Followed by Durvalumab in Patients With Unresectable Stage III NSCLC: A Phase 2 Randomized Study","authors":"Everett E. Vokes MD ,&nbsp;Francoise Mornex MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ahmet Sezer MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ying Cheng MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jian Fang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;David Vicente Baz MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Timucin Cil MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alex A. Adjei MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Myung-Ju Ahn MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Fabrice Barlesi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Enriqueta Felip MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Edward B. Garon MD, MS ,&nbsp;Francois Audhuy MSc ,&nbsp;Rena Ito MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masashi Sato MSc ,&nbsp;S. Peter Eggleton MB ,&nbsp;Claudio Marcelo Martin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Martin Reck MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Clifford G. Robinson MD ,&nbsp;Luis Paz-Ares MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtho.2023.09.1452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Preclinical evaluation of bintrafusp alfa (BA) combined with radiotherapy revealed greater antitumor effects than BA or radiotherapy alone. In a phase 1 study, BA exhibited encouraging clinical activity in patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who had received previous treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This multicenter, double-blind, controlled phase 2 study (NCT03840902) evaluated the safety and efficacy of BA with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by BA (BA group) versus placebo with cCRT followed by durvalumab (durvalumab group) in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. The primary end point was progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 as assessed by the investigator. On the basis of the recommendation of an independent data monitoring committee, the study was discontinued before the maturity of overall survival data (secondary end point).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 153 patients were randomized to either BA (n = 75) or durvalumab groups (n = 78). The median progression-free survival was 12.8 months versus 14.6 months (stratified hazard ratio = 1.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.69–3.17]), in the BA and durvalumab groups, respectively. Trends for overall response rate (29.3% versus 32.1%) and disease control rate (66.7% versus 70.5%) were similar between the two groups. Any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 94.6% versus 96.1% of patients in the BA versus durvalumab groups, respectively. Bleeding events in the BA group were mostly grade 1 (21.6%) or 2 (9.5%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>BA with cCRT followed by BA exhibited no efficacy benefit over placebo with cCRT followed by durvalumab in patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17515,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","volume":"19 2","pages":"Pages 285-296"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556086423022621/pdfft?md5=cbf088560c8312b181aaf18df3ed9aa0&pid=1-s2.0-S1556086423022621-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556086423022621","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Preclinical evaluation of bintrafusp alfa (BA) combined with radiotherapy revealed greater antitumor effects than BA or radiotherapy alone. In a phase 1 study, BA exhibited encouraging clinical activity in patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who had received previous treatment.

Methods

This multicenter, double-blind, controlled phase 2 study (NCT03840902) evaluated the safety and efficacy of BA with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by BA (BA group) versus placebo with cCRT followed by durvalumab (durvalumab group) in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. The primary end point was progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 as assessed by the investigator. On the basis of the recommendation of an independent data monitoring committee, the study was discontinued before the maturity of overall survival data (secondary end point).

Results

A total of 153 patients were randomized to either BA (n = 75) or durvalumab groups (n = 78). The median progression-free survival was 12.8 months versus 14.6 months (stratified hazard ratio = 1.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.69–3.17]), in the BA and durvalumab groups, respectively. Trends for overall response rate (29.3% versus 32.1%) and disease control rate (66.7% versus 70.5%) were similar between the two groups. Any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 94.6% versus 96.1% of patients in the BA versus durvalumab groups, respectively. Bleeding events in the BA group were mostly grade 1 (21.6%) or 2 (9.5%).

Conclusions

BA with cCRT followed by BA exhibited no efficacy benefit over placebo with cCRT followed by durvalumab in patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC.

在不可切除的III期NSCLC患者中,双曲福司-α联合cCRT,然后双曲福斯-α与安慰剂联合cRT,然后杜伐单抗:一项2期随机研究。
引言:临床前评估表明,与BA或单独放疗相比,二甲氧基苯醚(BA)联合放疗具有更大的抗肿瘤作用。在一项1期研究中,BA在既往接受过治疗的IIIB/IV期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中表现出令人鼓舞的临床活动。方法:这项多中心、双盲、对照的2期研究(NCT03840902)评估了BA联合放化疗(cRT)和BA(BA组)与安慰剂联合cRT和杜伐单抗(杜伐单抗组)治疗不可切除的III期NSCLC患者的安全性和有效性。主要终点是根据研究者评估的实体瘤反应评估标准1.1版的无进展生存期(PFS)。根据独立数据监测委员会的建议,该研究在总体生存数据成熟之前(次要终点)停止。结果:共有153名患者被随机分为BA组(n=75)或杜伐单抗组(n=78)。BA组和杜伐单抗组的中位PFS分别为12.8个月和14.6个月(分层危险比:1.48[95%置信区间,0.69-3.17])。两组的总体缓解率(29.3%对32.1%)和疾病控制率(66.7%对70.5%)趋势相似。BA组和杜伐单抗组中,94.6%和96.1%的患者出现任何级别的治疗突发不良事件。BA组的出血事件大多为1级(21.6%)或2级(9.5%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Journal of Thoracic Oncology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1406
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Oncology (JTO), the official journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer,is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to the prevention, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of all thoracic malignancies.The readship includes epidemiologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pulmonologists, radiologists, pathologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and research scientists with a special interest in thoracic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信