Presence of a remote fear memory engram in the central amygdala.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Learning & memory Pub Date : 2023-10-06 Print Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1101/lm.053833.123
Robert J Hammack, Victoria E Fischer, Mary Ann Andrade, Glenn M Toney
{"title":"Presence of a remote fear memory engram in the central amygdala.","authors":"Robert J Hammack, Victoria E Fischer, Mary Ann Andrade, Glenn M Toney","doi":"10.1101/lm.053833.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fear memory formation and recall are highly regulated processes, with the central amygdala (CeA) contributing to fear memory-related behaviors. We recently reported that a remote fear memory engram is resident in the anterior basolateral amygdala (aBLA). However, the extent to which downstream neurons in the CeA participate in this engram is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that CeA neurons activated during fear memory formation are reactivated during remote memory retrieval such that a CeA engram participates in remote fear memory recall and its associated behavior. Using contextual fear conditioning in TRAP2;Ai14 mice, we identified, by persistent Cre-dependent tdTomato expression (i.e., \"TRAPing\"), CeA neurons that were <i>c-fos</i>-activated during memory formation. Twenty-one days later, we quantified neurons activated during remote memory recall using Fos immunohistochemistry. Dual labeling was used to identify the subpopulation of CeA neurons that was both activated during memory formation and reactivated during recall. Compared with their context-conditioned (no shock) controls, fear-conditioned (electric shock) mice (<i>n</i> = 5/group) exhibited more robust fear memory-related behavior (freezing) as well as larger populations of activated (tdTomato<sup>+</sup>) and reactivated (dual-labeled) CeA neurons. Most neurons in both groups were mainly located in the capsular CeA subdivision (CeAC). Notably, however, only the size of the TRAPed population distributed throughout the CeA was significantly correlated with time spent freezing during remote fear memory recall. Our findings indicate that fear memory formation robustly activates CeA neurons and that a subset located mainly in the CeAC may contribute to both remote fear memory storage/retrieval and the resulting fear-like behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":18003,"journal":{"name":"Learning & memory","volume":"30 10","pages":"250-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & memory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053833.123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fear memory formation and recall are highly regulated processes, with the central amygdala (CeA) contributing to fear memory-related behaviors. We recently reported that a remote fear memory engram is resident in the anterior basolateral amygdala (aBLA). However, the extent to which downstream neurons in the CeA participate in this engram is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that CeA neurons activated during fear memory formation are reactivated during remote memory retrieval such that a CeA engram participates in remote fear memory recall and its associated behavior. Using contextual fear conditioning in TRAP2;Ai14 mice, we identified, by persistent Cre-dependent tdTomato expression (i.e., "TRAPing"), CeA neurons that were c-fos-activated during memory formation. Twenty-one days later, we quantified neurons activated during remote memory recall using Fos immunohistochemistry. Dual labeling was used to identify the subpopulation of CeA neurons that was both activated during memory formation and reactivated during recall. Compared with their context-conditioned (no shock) controls, fear-conditioned (electric shock) mice (n = 5/group) exhibited more robust fear memory-related behavior (freezing) as well as larger populations of activated (tdTomato+) and reactivated (dual-labeled) CeA neurons. Most neurons in both groups were mainly located in the capsular CeA subdivision (CeAC). Notably, however, only the size of the TRAPed population distributed throughout the CeA was significantly correlated with time spent freezing during remote fear memory recall. Our findings indicate that fear memory formation robustly activates CeA neurons and that a subset located mainly in the CeAC may contribute to both remote fear memory storage/retrieval and the resulting fear-like behavior.

杏仁核中央存在一个遥远的恐惧记忆。
恐惧记忆的形成和回忆是高度调节的过程,中央杏仁核(CeA)对恐惧记忆相关行为有贡献。我们最近报道了一个遥远的恐惧记忆印记存在于前基底外侧杏仁核(aBLA)中。然而,CeA的下游神经元在多大程度上参与了这一植入尚不清楚。我们检验了这样一种假设,即在恐惧记忆形成过程中激活的CeA神经元在远程记忆检索过程中被重新激活,因此CeA印迹参与了远程恐惧记忆回忆及其相关行为。在TRAP2中使用上下文恐惧条件反射;我们通过持续的Cre依赖性tdTomato表达(即“TRAPing”)鉴定了Ai14小鼠,即在记忆形成过程中被c-fos激活的CeA神经元。21天后,我们使用Fos免疫组织化学对远程记忆回忆过程中激活的神经元进行了量化。双重标记用于识别在记忆形成过程中被激活和在回忆过程中被重新激活的CeA神经元亚群。与上下文条件(无电击)对照组相比,恐惧条件(电击)小鼠(n=5/组)表现出更强大的恐惧记忆相关行为(冷冻),以及更多的激活(tdTomato+)和重新激活(双重标记)CeA神经元。两组的大部分神经元主要分布在囊膜CeA区(CeAC)。然而,值得注意的是,只有分布在整个CeA中的TRAPed群体的大小与在远程恐惧记忆回忆过程中冻结的时间显著相关。我们的研究结果表明,恐惧记忆的形成有力地激活了CeA神经元,并且主要位于CeAC中的一个子集可能有助于远程恐惧记忆的存储/检索以及由此产生的类似恐惧的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning & memory
Learning & memory 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The neurobiology of learning and memory is entering a new interdisciplinary era. Advances in neuropsychology have identified regions of brain tissue that are critical for certain types of function. Electrophysiological techniques have revealed behavioral correlates of neuronal activity. Studies of synaptic plasticity suggest that some mechanisms of memory formation may resemble those of neural development. And molecular approaches have identified genes with patterns of expression that influence behavior. It is clear that future progress depends on interdisciplinary investigations. The current literature of learning and memory is large but fragmented. Until now, there has been no single journal devoted to this area of study and no dominant journal that demands attention by serious workers in the area, regardless of specialty. Learning & Memory provides a forum for these investigations in the form of research papers and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信