What can neurodiversity tell us about inner speech, and vice versa? A theoretical perspective

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ben Alderson-Day , Amy Pearson
{"title":"What can neurodiversity tell us about inner speech, and vice versa? A theoretical perspective","authors":"Ben Alderson-Day ,&nbsp;Amy Pearson","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2023.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Inner speech refers to the experience of talking to oneself in one's head. While notoriously challenging to investigate, it has also been central to a range of questions concerning mind, brain, and behaviour. Posited as a key component in executive function and self-regulation, inner speech has been claimed to be crucial in higher cognitive operations, self-knowledge and self-awareness. Such arguments have traditionally been supported with examples of atypical development. But variations in inner speech – and in some cases, significant diversity – in fact pose several key challenges to such claims, and raises many more questions for, language, thought and mental health more generally.</p><p>In this review, we will summarise evidence on the experience and operation of inner speech in child and adult neurotypical populations, autistic people and other neurodivergent groups, and people with diverse experiences of linguistic and sensory development, including deafness. We will demonstrate that the relationship between inner speech and cognitive operations may be more complex than first assumed when explored through the lens of cognitive and neurological diversity, and the implications of that for understanding the developing brain in all populations. We discuss why and how the experience of inner speech in neurodivergent groups has often been assumed rather than investigated, making it an important opportunity for researchers to develop innovative future work that integrates participatory insights with cognitive methodology. Finally, we will outline why variations in inner speech – in neurotypical and neurodivergent populations alike – nevertheless have a range of important implications for mental health vulnerability and unmet need. In this sense, the example of inner speech offers us both a way of looking back at the logic of developmental psychology and neuropsychology, and a clue to its future in a neurodiverse world.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"168 ","pages":"Pages 193-202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001094522300206X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inner speech refers to the experience of talking to oneself in one's head. While notoriously challenging to investigate, it has also been central to a range of questions concerning mind, brain, and behaviour. Posited as a key component in executive function and self-regulation, inner speech has been claimed to be crucial in higher cognitive operations, self-knowledge and self-awareness. Such arguments have traditionally been supported with examples of atypical development. But variations in inner speech – and in some cases, significant diversity – in fact pose several key challenges to such claims, and raises many more questions for, language, thought and mental health more generally.

In this review, we will summarise evidence on the experience and operation of inner speech in child and adult neurotypical populations, autistic people and other neurodivergent groups, and people with diverse experiences of linguistic and sensory development, including deafness. We will demonstrate that the relationship between inner speech and cognitive operations may be more complex than first assumed when explored through the lens of cognitive and neurological diversity, and the implications of that for understanding the developing brain in all populations. We discuss why and how the experience of inner speech in neurodivergent groups has often been assumed rather than investigated, making it an important opportunity for researchers to develop innovative future work that integrates participatory insights with cognitive methodology. Finally, we will outline why variations in inner speech – in neurotypical and neurodivergent populations alike – nevertheless have a range of important implications for mental health vulnerability and unmet need. In this sense, the example of inner speech offers us both a way of looking back at the logic of developmental psychology and neuropsychology, and a clue to its future in a neurodiverse world.

神经多样性能告诉我们关于内心言语的什么,反之亦然?理论观点。
内心话语是指在头脑中与自己交谈的经历。尽管众所周知,它的研究具有挑战性,但它也是一系列涉及心理、大脑和行为的问题的核心。内部言语被认为是执行功能和自我调节的关键组成部分,被认为在更高的认知操作、自我认知和自我意识中至关重要。传统上,非典型发展的例子支持了这种论点。但内心语言的变化——在某些情况下,还有显著的多样性——实际上对这些说法提出了几个关键挑战,并对语言、思想和心理健康提出了更多的问题。在这篇综述中,我们将总结儿童和成人神经正常人群、自闭症患者和其他神经分化群体,以及具有不同语言和感官发展经验(包括耳聋)的人的内心言语经验和操作的证据。我们将证明,当从认知和神经多样性的角度进行探索时,内部言语和认知操作之间的关系可能比最初假设的更复杂,以及这对理解所有人群中发育中的大脑的影响。我们讨论了为什么以及如何经常假设而不是调查神经分化群体的内心言语体验,这为研究人员开发创新的未来工作提供了一个重要机会,将参与式见解与认知方法相结合。最后,我们将概述为什么在神经正常和神经分化人群中,内心言语的变化对心理健康脆弱性和未满足的需求有一系列重要影响。从这个意义上说,内心言语的例子为我们提供了一种回顾发展心理学和神经心理学逻辑的方式,也为我们提供一条在神经多样性世界中展望其未来的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信