Reinvestigating the Perceptions of Annual Skin Cancer Screening Scale: a suitable measure for older adults.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
European Journal of Cancer Prevention Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000846
Matt C Howard
{"title":"Reinvestigating the Perceptions of Annual Skin Cancer Screening Scale: a suitable measure for older adults.","authors":"Matt C Howard","doi":"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Perceptions of Annual Skin Cancer Screening Scale (PASCSS) explains significant variance in whether people undergo annual clinical skin cancer screening beyond other relevant predictors. When developing the PASCSS, the author only tested its psychometric properties and validity with participants representative of the general USA population, despite the particular relevance of annual clinical skin cancer screenings to at-risk populations, namely, older adults. We reanalyze the PASCSS using a sample of older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a three-wave survey study (n = 237) with each wave separated by one week. Demographic information was recorded at Time 1. The PASCSS was administered at Time 2. Outcomes were measured at Time 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model fit of our confirmatory factor analysis met or closely approached traditional cutoffs, and each item loaded very strongly onto its respective latent factor. These PASCSS's dimensions together explained an additional 38% of variance in dermatologist screening and 37% of variance in any medical professional screening beyond our control variables (both P  < 0.01). The dimension of Unknowledgeable was statistically significant in predicting dermatologist screening ( P  = 0.03), whereas the three dimensions of Forget, Recommended, and Unknowledgeable were statistically significant in predicting any medical professional screening (all P  < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results supported the psychometric properties and validity of the PASCSS, and we showed that the dimensions significantly relate to whether participants received a clinical skin cancer screening in the past year. The current investigation supports that the PASCSS is appropriate to administer to older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":11830,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"177-180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000846","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Perceptions of Annual Skin Cancer Screening Scale (PASCSS) explains significant variance in whether people undergo annual clinical skin cancer screening beyond other relevant predictors. When developing the PASCSS, the author only tested its psychometric properties and validity with participants representative of the general USA population, despite the particular relevance of annual clinical skin cancer screenings to at-risk populations, namely, older adults. We reanalyze the PASCSS using a sample of older adults.

Methods: We conducted a three-wave survey study (n = 237) with each wave separated by one week. Demographic information was recorded at Time 1. The PASCSS was administered at Time 2. Outcomes were measured at Time 3.

Results: The model fit of our confirmatory factor analysis met or closely approached traditional cutoffs, and each item loaded very strongly onto its respective latent factor. These PASCSS's dimensions together explained an additional 38% of variance in dermatologist screening and 37% of variance in any medical professional screening beyond our control variables (both P  < 0.01). The dimension of Unknowledgeable was statistically significant in predicting dermatologist screening ( P  = 0.03), whereas the three dimensions of Forget, Recommended, and Unknowledgeable were statistically significant in predicting any medical professional screening (all P  < 0.05).

Conclusion: Our results supported the psychometric properties and validity of the PASCSS, and we showed that the dimensions significantly relate to whether participants received a clinical skin cancer screening in the past year. The current investigation supports that the PASCSS is appropriate to administer to older adults.

对年度皮肤癌症筛查量表认知的再研究:一项适合老年人的测量。
目的:年度皮肤癌症筛查量表(PASCSS)的认知解释了人们是否接受年度临床皮肤癌症筛查的显著差异,超过了其他相关预测因素。在开发PASCSS时,尽管每年临床皮肤癌症筛查与高危人群(即老年人)特别相关,但作者仅在代表美国普通人群的参与者中测试了其心理测量特性和有效性。我们使用老年人的样本重新分析PASCSS。方法:我们进行了三波调查研究(n = 237),每波间隔一周。人口统计信息记录在时间1。PASCSS在时间2进行给药。在时间3测量结果。结果:我们的验证性因素分析的模型拟合符合或接近传统的临界值,并且每个项目都非常强烈地加载到其各自的潜在因素上。这些PASCSS的维度共同解释了皮肤科医生筛查中38%的额外方差和任何医学专业人员筛查中37%的方差,超出了我们的控制变量(P 结论:我们的结果支持了PASCSS的心理测量特性和有效性,我们发现这些维度与参与者在过去一年中是否接受了临床皮肤癌症筛查显著相关。目前的调查支持PASCSS适用于老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Cancer Prevention aims to promote an increased awareness of all aspects of cancer prevention and to stimulate new ideas and innovations. The Journal has a wide-ranging scope, covering such aspects as descriptive and metabolic epidemiology, histopathology, genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, microbiology, clinical medicine, intervention trials and public education, basic laboratory studies and special group studies. Although affiliated to a European organization, the journal addresses issues of international importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信