Optimal energy provision early in ICU stay for critically ill patients receiving parenteral nutrition.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1002/ncp.11075
Ahmed Nagy, Justin Delic, James M Hollands, Song Oh, Stacy Pasciolla, Laura Pontiggia, Diana Solomon, Angela L Bingham
{"title":"Optimal energy provision early in ICU stay for critically ill patients receiving parenteral nutrition.","authors":"Ahmed Nagy, Justin Delic, James M Hollands, Song Oh, Stacy Pasciolla, Laura Pontiggia, Diana Solomon, Angela L Bingham","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Literature on optimal energy provision via parenteral nutrition (PN) is limited and the evidence quality is low. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in outcomes in adult critically ill patients when receiving lower vs higher calorie provision via PN early in intensive care unit (ICU) stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients initiated on PN within the first 10 days of ICU stay from May 2014 to June 2021 were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome was to determine the impact of lower (<20 kcal/kg/day) vs higher (>25 kcal/kg/day) calorie provision on all-cause, in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were to determine the impact of calorie provision on hospital or ICU length of stay and incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 133 patients: a lower calorie provision group (n = 77) and a higher calorie provision group (n = 56). There was a significant difference in all-cause, in-hospital mortality between the lower and the higher calorie provision groups (36.36% and 17.86%, respectively; P = 0.02). However, upon a multivariate analysis of death at discharge, the specific calorie provision group did not affect the probability of death at hospital discharge. The secondary outcomes were not significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When comparing lower calorie provision with higher calorie provision in adult critically ill patients receiving PN early within their ICU stay, there were no differences in outcomes after controlling for significant confounders. Future larger prospective studies should further evaluate optimal caloric provision via PN in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Literature on optimal energy provision via parenteral nutrition (PN) is limited and the evidence quality is low. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in outcomes in adult critically ill patients when receiving lower vs higher calorie provision via PN early in intensive care unit (ICU) stay.

Methods: Adult patients initiated on PN within the first 10 days of ICU stay from May 2014 to June 2021 were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome was to determine the impact of lower (<20 kcal/kg/day) vs higher (>25 kcal/kg/day) calorie provision on all-cause, in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were to determine the impact of calorie provision on hospital or ICU length of stay and incidence of complications.

Results: This study included 133 patients: a lower calorie provision group (n = 77) and a higher calorie provision group (n = 56). There was a significant difference in all-cause, in-hospital mortality between the lower and the higher calorie provision groups (36.36% and 17.86%, respectively; P = 0.02). However, upon a multivariate analysis of death at discharge, the specific calorie provision group did not affect the probability of death at hospital discharge. The secondary outcomes were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusion: When comparing lower calorie provision with higher calorie provision in adult critically ill patients receiving PN early within their ICU stay, there were no differences in outcomes after controlling for significant confounders. Future larger prospective studies should further evaluate optimal caloric provision via PN in this population.

为接受肠外营养的危重患者在ICU早期提供最佳能量。
背景:关于通过肠外营养(PN)提供最佳能量的文献有限,证据质量低。本研究的目的是确定成年危重患者在重症监护室(ICU)早期接受PN提供的低热量食物与高热量食物的结果是否存在差异。方法:将2014年5月至2021年6月在ICU住院的前10天内开始接受PN的成年患者纳入本回顾性研究。主要结果是确定 kcal/kg/天)热量供应对全因住院死亡率的影响。次要结果是确定卡路里供应对住院或ICU住院时间和并发症发生率的影响。结果:本研究包括133名患者:低热量饮食组(n = 77)和高热量供应组(n = 56)。低热量组和高热量组的全因住院死亡率有显著差异(分别为36.36%和17.86%;P = 0.02)。然而,根据出院时死亡的多变量分析,特定热量供应组不会影响出院时的死亡概率。次要结果在各组之间没有显著差异。结论:在ICU早期接受PN治疗的成年危重患者中,当比较低热量供应和高热量供应时,在控制了显著的混杂因素后,结果没有差异。未来更大规模的前瞻性研究应进一步评估该人群中通过PN提供的最佳热量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信