Lipid-Lowering Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Moderate-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Versus High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy: A Randomized, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Trial From Korea.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI:10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.277
Hyejung Choi, Si-Hyuck Kang, Sang-Woo Jeong, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Tae-Jin Youn, Woo Hyuk Song, Dong Woon Jeon, Sang Wook Lim, Jun-Hee Lee, Seong-Wook Cho, In-Ho Chae, Cheol-Ho Kim
{"title":"Lipid-Lowering Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Moderate-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Versus High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy: A Randomized, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Trial From Korea.","authors":"Hyejung Choi, Si-Hyuck Kang, Sang-Woo Jeong, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Tae-Jin Youn, Woo Hyuk Song, Dong Woon Jeon, Sang Wook Lim, Jun-Hee Lee, Seong-Wook Cho, In-Ho Chae, Cheol-Ho Kim","doi":"10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This phase IV, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label, and parallel clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and moderate intensity rosuvastatin combination therapy to that of high intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled patients with ASCVD and after a four-week screening period, patients were randomly assigned to receive either rosuvastatin and ezetimibe (RE 10/10 group) or high-intensity rosuvastatin (R20 group) only in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the difference in the percent change in the mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level from baseline to 12 weeks between two groups after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, the RE10/10 group had a greater reduction in LDL-C level compared to the R20 group (-22.9±2.6% vs. -15.6 ± 2.5% [<i>p</i>=0.041] and -24.2±2.5% vs. -12.9±2.4% [<i>p</i>=0.001] at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively). Moreover, a greater number of patients achieved the target LDL-C level of ≤70 mg/dL after the treatment period in the combination group (74.6% vs. 59.9% [<i>p</i>=0.012] and 76.2% vs. 50.8% [<i>p</i><0.001] at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively). Importantly, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of overall adverse events and adverse drug reactions between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe combination therapy had better efficacy in lowering LDL-C levels without increasing adverse effects in patients with ASCVD than high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03494270.</p>","PeriodicalId":16284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis","volume":"12 3","pages":"277-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/db/7b/jla-12-277.PMC10548190.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This phase IV, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label, and parallel clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and moderate intensity rosuvastatin combination therapy to that of high intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

Methods: This study enrolled patients with ASCVD and after a four-week screening period, patients were randomly assigned to receive either rosuvastatin and ezetimibe (RE 10/10 group) or high-intensity rosuvastatin (R20 group) only in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the difference in the percent change in the mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level from baseline to 12 weeks between two groups after treatment.

Results: The study found that after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, the RE10/10 group had a greater reduction in LDL-C level compared to the R20 group (-22.9±2.6% vs. -15.6 ± 2.5% [p=0.041] and -24.2±2.5% vs. -12.9±2.4% [p=0.001] at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively). Moreover, a greater number of patients achieved the target LDL-C level of ≤70 mg/dL after the treatment period in the combination group (74.6% vs. 59.9% [p=0.012] and 76.2% vs. 50.8% [p<0.001] at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively). Importantly, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of overall adverse events and adverse drug reactions between two groups.

Conclusion: Moderate-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe combination therapy had better efficacy in lowering LDL-C levels without increasing adverse effects in patients with ASCVD than high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03494270.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中等强度他汀类药物和依替米贝联合治疗与高强度他汀类单一治疗的降脂疗效:一项来自韩国的随机、开放标签、非劣效试验。
目的:本研究为IV期、多中心、随机对照、开放标签、,以及平行临床试验,旨在比较依折麦布和中等强度瑞舒伐他汀联合治疗与高强度瑞舒他汀单药治疗动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)患者的疗效和安全性,患者被随机分配接受瑞舒伐他汀和依折麦布(RE 10/10组)或仅以1:1的比例接受高强度瑞舒伐丁(R20组)。主要结果是两组治疗后从基线到12周的平均低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平变化百分比的差异。结果:研究发现,在治疗12周和24周后,与R20组相比,RE10/10组的LDL-C水平下降幅度更大(分别为-22.9±2.6%对-15.6±2.5%[p=0.041]和-24.2±2.5%对-12.9±2.4%[p=0.001])。此外在联合治疗组中,更多的患者在治疗期后达到≤70 mg/dL的目标LDL-C水平(74.6%对59.9%[p=0.012]和76.2%对50.8%[结论:中等强度瑞舒伐他汀和依折麦布联合治疗在降低ASCVD患者LDL-C水平而不增加不良反应方面比高强度瑞舒他汀单一治疗效果更好。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03494270。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信