Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study

IF 3.7 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1111/cid.13278

Wenxue Wang DDS, Hao Xu DDS, Dongmei Mei DDS, Chen Zhou MDS, Xiaojing Li DDS, Ze'yu Han MDS, Xiaobin Zhou MDS, Xin Li DDS, Baodong Zhao MDS

{"title":"Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study","authors":"Wenxue Wang DDS, Hao Xu DDS, Dongmei Mei DDS, Chen Zhou MDS, Xiaojing Li DDS, Ze'yu Han MDS, Xiaobin Zhou MDS, Xin Li DDS, Baodong Zhao MDS","doi":"10.1111/cid.13278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system with that of fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) template in edentulous implantation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirteen patients with edentulous were recruited and divided into two groups: the Yake robotic system group (experimental) (<i>n</i> = 5) and the CAIS group (control) (<i>n</i> = 8). Postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed immediately, and the 3-dimensional positions of implants were obtained and compared with that in the preoperative design. The comparison showed platform, apical, depth, and angular deviations. A value of <i>p</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 84 implants (36 in the robotic group and 48 in the CAIS group) were placed. The mean deviation at the implant platform, apex, depth, and angle in the CAIS group was 1.37 ± 0.72 mm, 1.28 ± 0.68 mm, 0.88 ± 0.47 mm, and 3.47 ± 2.02°, respectively. However, the mean deviation at the implant platform, apex, depth, and angle in the robotic group was 0.65 ± 0.25 mm, 0.65 ± 0.22 mm, 0.49 ± 0.24 mm, and 1.43 ± 1.18°, respectively. Significant differences in the four types of deviation (<i>p</i> < 0.05) between the two groups were observed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The accuracy of robotic system in edentulous implant placement was superior to that of the CAIS template, suggesting that robotic system is more accurate, safe, and flexible, can be considered a promising treatment in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"26 2","pages":"309-316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To compare the accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system with that of fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) template in edentulous implantation.

Materials and Methods

Thirteen patients with edentulous were recruited and divided into two groups: the Yake robotic system group (experimental) (n = 5) and the CAIS group (control) (n = 8). Postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed immediately, and the 3-dimensional positions of implants were obtained and compared with that in the preoperative design. The comparison showed platform, apical, depth, and angular deviations. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 84 implants (36 in the robotic group and 48 in the CAIS group) were placed. The mean deviation at the implant platform, apex, depth, and angle in the CAIS group was 1.37 ± 0.72 mm, 1.28 ± 0.68 mm, 0.88 ± 0.47 mm, and 3.47 ± 2.02°, respectively. However, the mean deviation at the implant platform, apex, depth, and angle in the robotic group was 0.65 ± 0.25 mm, 0.65 ± 0.22 mm, 0.49 ± 0.24 mm, and 1.43 ± 1.18°, respectively. Significant differences in the four types of deviation (p < 0.05) between the two groups were observed.

Conclusion

The accuracy of robotic system in edentulous implant placement was superior to that of the CAIS template, suggesting that robotic system is more accurate, safe, and flexible, can be considered a promising treatment in clinical practice.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Yakebot牙种植机器人系统与全引导静态计算机辅助种植手术模板在无牙颌种植中的准确性：一项初步临床研究。

目的：比较Yakebot牙种植机器人系统与全引导静态计算机辅助种植手术（CAIS）模板在无牙种植中的准确性。材料和方法：13例缺牙患者被招募并分为两组：亚克机器人系统组（实验组）（n = 5） CAIS组（对照组）（n = 8）。术后立即进行锥束计算机断层扫描（CBCT），获得植入物的三维位置，并与术前设计进行比较。比较显示了平台、顶端、深度和角度的偏差。p值结果：共放置了84个植入物（机器人组36个，CAIS组48个）。CAIS组植入物平台、顶点、深度和角度的平均偏差为1.37 ± 0.72 毫米，1.28 ± 0.68 毫米，0.88 ± 0.47 mm和3.47 ±2.02°。然而，机器人组在植入平台、顶点、深度和角度的平均偏差为0.65 ± 0.25 毫米，0.65 ± 0.22 毫米，0.49 ±0.24 mm和1.43 ± 分别为1.18°。四种类型的偏差存在显著差异（p结论：机器人系统在无牙种植体植入中的准确性优于CAIS模板，表明机器人系统更准确、安全、灵活，可被认为是临床实践中一种有前景的治疗方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.00

自引率

13.90%

发文量

103

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.