Effects of Bundling Medication for Opioid Use Disorder With an mHealth Intervention Targeting Addiction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
American Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.20230055
David H Gustafson, Gina Landucci, Olivia J Vjorn, Rachel E Gicquelais, Simon B Goldberg, Darcie C Johnston, John J Curtin, Genie L Bailey, Dhavan V Shah, Klaren Pe-Romashko, David H Gustafson
{"title":"Effects of Bundling Medication for Opioid Use Disorder With an mHealth Intervention Targeting Addiction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"David H Gustafson, Gina Landucci, Olivia J Vjorn, Rachel E Gicquelais, Simon B Goldberg, Darcie C Johnston, John J Curtin, Genie L Bailey, Dhavan V Shah, Klaren Pe-Romashko, David H Gustafson","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.20230055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) improves treatment retention and reduces illicit opioid use. A-CHESS is an evidence-based smartphone intervention shown to improve addiction-related behaviors. The authors tested the efficacy of MOUD alone versus MOUD plus A-CHESS to determine whether the combination further improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an unblinded parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 414 participants recruited from outpatient programs were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either MOUD alone or MOUD+A-CHESS for 16 months and were followed for an additional 8 months. All participants were on methadone, buprenorphine, or injectable naltrexone. The primary outcome was abstinence from illicit opioid use; secondary outcomes were treatment retention, health services use, other substance use, and quality of life; moderators were MOUD type, gender, withdrawal symptom severity, pain severity, and loneliness. Data sources were surveys comprising multiple validated scales, as well as urine screens, every 4 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in abstinence between participants in the MOUD+A-CHESS and MOUD-alone arms across time (odds ratio=1.10, 95% CI=0.90-1.33). However, abstinence was moderated by withdrawal symptom severity (odds ratio=0.95, 95% CI=0.91-1.00) and MOUD type (odds ratio=0.57, 95% CI=0.34-0.97). Among participants without withdrawal symptoms, abstinence rates were higher over time for those in the MOUD+A-CHESS arm than for those in the MOUD-alone arm (odds ratio=1.30, 95% CI=1.01-1.67). Among participants taking methadone, those in the MOUD+A-CHESS arm were more likely to be abstinent over time (b=0.28, SE=0.09) than those in the MOUD-alone arm (b=0.06, SE=0.08), although the two groups did not differ significantly from each other (∆b=0.22, SE=0.11). MOUD+A-CHESS was also associated with greater meeting attendance (odds ratio=1.25, 95% CI=1.05-1.49) and decreased emergency department and urgent care use (odds ratio=0.88, 95% CI=0.78-0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, MOUD+A-CHESS did not improve abstinence relative to MOUD alone. However, MOUD+A-CHESS may provide benefits for subsets of patients and may impact treatment utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7656,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"115-124"},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10843669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20230055","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) improves treatment retention and reduces illicit opioid use. A-CHESS is an evidence-based smartphone intervention shown to improve addiction-related behaviors. The authors tested the efficacy of MOUD alone versus MOUD plus A-CHESS to determine whether the combination further improved outcomes.

Methods: In an unblinded parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 414 participants recruited from outpatient programs were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either MOUD alone or MOUD+A-CHESS for 16 months and were followed for an additional 8 months. All participants were on methadone, buprenorphine, or injectable naltrexone. The primary outcome was abstinence from illicit opioid use; secondary outcomes were treatment retention, health services use, other substance use, and quality of life; moderators were MOUD type, gender, withdrawal symptom severity, pain severity, and loneliness. Data sources were surveys comprising multiple validated scales, as well as urine screens, every 4 months.

Results: There was no difference in abstinence between participants in the MOUD+A-CHESS and MOUD-alone arms across time (odds ratio=1.10, 95% CI=0.90-1.33). However, abstinence was moderated by withdrawal symptom severity (odds ratio=0.95, 95% CI=0.91-1.00) and MOUD type (odds ratio=0.57, 95% CI=0.34-0.97). Among participants without withdrawal symptoms, abstinence rates were higher over time for those in the MOUD+A-CHESS arm than for those in the MOUD-alone arm (odds ratio=1.30, 95% CI=1.01-1.67). Among participants taking methadone, those in the MOUD+A-CHESS arm were more likely to be abstinent over time (b=0.28, SE=0.09) than those in the MOUD-alone arm (b=0.06, SE=0.08), although the two groups did not differ significantly from each other (∆b=0.22, SE=0.11). MOUD+A-CHESS was also associated with greater meeting attendance (odds ratio=1.25, 95% CI=1.05-1.49) and decreased emergency department and urgent care use (odds ratio=0.88, 95% CI=0.78-0.99).

Conclusions: Overall, MOUD+A-CHESS did not improve abstinence relative to MOUD alone. However, MOUD+A-CHESS may provide benefits for subsets of patients and may impact treatment utilization.

阿片类药物使用障碍与针对成瘾的mHealth干预捆绑用药的效果:一项随机临床试验。
目的:阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的药物治疗可提高治疗保留率,减少阿片类物质的非法使用。A-CHESS是一种基于证据的智能手机干预措施,被证明可以改善成瘾相关行为。作者测试了单独使用MOUD与MOUD加A-CHESS的疗效,以确定联合用药是否进一步改善了疗效。方法:在一项非盲平行组随机对照试验中,414名从门诊项目招募的参与者以1:1的比例被分配接受单独的MOUD或MOUD+a-CHESS治疗16个月,并再随访8个月。所有参与者均服用美沙酮、丁丙诺啡或注射用纳曲酮。主要结果是戒除非法使用阿片类药物;次要结果是治疗保留、卫生服务使用、其他物质使用和生活质量;调节因子为MOUD类型、性别、戒断症状严重程度、疼痛严重程度和孤独感。数据来源是每4个月一次的调查,包括多个经验证的量表以及尿液筛查。结果:MOUD+A-CHESS组和单独使用MOUD组的参与者在禁欲方面没有时间差异(比值比=1.10,95%CI=0.90-1.33)。然而,戒断症状的严重程度(比值比=0.95,95%CI=0.91-1.00)和MOUD类型(比值比0.57,95%CI=0.34-0.97)对禁欲有调节作用。在没有戒断症状的参与者中,随着时间的推移,MOUD+A-CHESS组的禁欲率高于单独MOUD组(比值比=1.30,95%CI=1.01-1.67)。在服用美沙酮的参与者中,MOUD+A-CHESS组的参与者随着时间的流逝更有可能禁欲(b=0.28,SE=0.09),尽管两组之间没有显著差异(∆b=0.22,SE=0.11)。MOUD+A-CHESS也与更高的会议出席率(比值比=1.25,95%CI=1.05-1.49)和减少急诊科和紧急护理的使用(比值比=0.88,95%CI=0.78-0.99)有关。然而,MOUD+A-CHESS可能为患者子集提供益处,并可能影响治疗利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Psychiatry, dedicated to keeping psychiatry vibrant and relevant, publishes the latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. The journal covers the full spectrum of issues related to mental health diagnoses and treatment, presenting original articles on new developments in diagnosis, treatment, neuroscience, and patient populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信