Effectiveness of leukapheresis on early survival in acute myeloid leukemia: An observational propensity score matching cohort study

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Howon Lee, Jay Ho Han, Jae Kwon Kim, Jaeeun Yoo, Hyung Suk Cho, Jae-Ho Yoon, Byung Sik Cho, Hee-Je Kim, Jihyang Lim, Dong Wook Jekarl, Yonggoo Kim
{"title":"Effectiveness of leukapheresis on early survival in acute myeloid leukemia: An observational propensity score matching cohort study","authors":"Howon Lee,&nbsp;Jay Ho Han,&nbsp;Jae Kwon Kim,&nbsp;Jaeeun Yoo,&nbsp;Hyung Suk Cho,&nbsp;Jae-Ho Yoon,&nbsp;Byung Sik Cho,&nbsp;Hee-Je Kim,&nbsp;Jihyang Lim,&nbsp;Dong Wook Jekarl,&nbsp;Yonggoo Kim","doi":"10.1002/jca.22090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The association between leukapheresis (LK) as a treatment option for hyperleukocytosis (HL) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were extracted from the electronic medical record for 2801 patients with AML between April 2009 and December 2019. LK was performed when the leukocyte count was ≥100 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L at the time initial bone marrow examination.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A comparison between the patients with HL in the non-LK (n = 1579) and LK (n = 208) groups revealed survival probabilities (%) of 93.2% and 90.4% (<i>P</i> = .130) for day 30 (D30), 85.4% and 84.2% (<i>P</i> = .196) for D60, and 83.6% and 80.8% (<i>P</i> = .258) for D90, respectively. After propensity score matching, a comparison between the patients with HL in the non-LK (n = 192) and LK (n = 192) groups revealed survival probabilities (%) of 83.9% and 91.2% (<i>P</i> = .030) for D30, 75.0% and 84.9% (<i>P</i> = .015) for day 60 (D60), and 62.4% and 81.3% (<i>P</i> = .034) for day 90 (D90), respectively. After D150, the observed effect of LK appeared to be mitigated without a survival benefit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>LK was associated with improved early survival outcomes at D30, D60, and D90 among patients with AML exhibiting HL. Thus, it may be considered a treatment option for reducing cell mass in such patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"38 6","pages":"727-737"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The association between leukapheresis (LK) as a treatment option for hyperleukocytosis (HL) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial.

Methods

Data were extracted from the electronic medical record for 2801 patients with AML between April 2009 and December 2019. LK was performed when the leukocyte count was ≥100 × 109/L at the time initial bone marrow examination.

Results

A comparison between the patients with HL in the non-LK (n = 1579) and LK (n = 208) groups revealed survival probabilities (%) of 93.2% and 90.4% (P = .130) for day 30 (D30), 85.4% and 84.2% (P = .196) for D60, and 83.6% and 80.8% (P = .258) for D90, respectively. After propensity score matching, a comparison between the patients with HL in the non-LK (n = 192) and LK (n = 192) groups revealed survival probabilities (%) of 83.9% and 91.2% (P = .030) for D30, 75.0% and 84.9% (P = .015) for day 60 (D60), and 62.4% and 81.3% (P = .034) for day 90 (D90), respectively. After D150, the observed effect of LK appeared to be mitigated without a survival benefit.

Discussion

LK was associated with improved early survival outcomes at D30, D60, and D90 among patients with AML exhibiting HL. Thus, it may be considered a treatment option for reducing cell mass in such patients.

白血病治疗对急性髓系白血病早期生存的有效性:一项观察性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
背景:白血病(LK)作为治疗急性髓系白血病(AML)患者高白细胞增多症(HL)的一种选择之间的关系仍然存在争议。方法:从2009年4月至2019年12月期间2801名AML患者的电子病历中提取数据。当白细胞计数≥100时进行LK × 109/L。结果:非LK(n = 1579)和LK(n = 208)组的生存率分别为93.2%和90.4%(P = .130)、85.4%和84.2%(P = .196)、83.6%和80.8%(P = .258)。在倾向评分匹配后,非LK(n = 192)和LK(n = 192)组的生存率分别为83.9%和91.2%(P = .030)、75.0%和84.9%(P = .015)、62.4%和81.3%(P = .034)分别用于第90天(D90)。D150后,观察到的LK效应似乎减轻了,但没有生存益处。讨论:LK与表现为HL的AML患者在D30、D60和D90时的早期生存结果改善有关。因此,它可以被认为是减少此类患者细胞质量的一种治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信