Interventions to tackle health inequalities in cardiovascular risks for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a rapid review.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Yu Fu, Ge Yu, Naswa Maulana, Katie Thomson
{"title":"Interventions to tackle health inequalities in cardiovascular risks for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a rapid review.","authors":"Yu Fu, Ge Yu, Naswa Maulana, Katie Thomson","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldad025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has shown significant health inequalities for people with low socioeconomic status associated with more risk factors. This review was to synthesize interventions that targeted CVD risks and outcomes among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations and to understand the impact associated with these interventions.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched for records published in the last decade using a systematic search strategy, complemented by screening the reference lists and citation indexes. Nineteen studies were included and a narrative synthesis with the effect direction plot was undertaken in which studies, interventions, participants and outcomes were examined according to the intervention type focusing on behaviours, lifestyle, education, medication and monitoring.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>No universal definition of disadvantaged socioeconomic status was used with common factors relating to racial/ethnic minorities, low income and low or no health insurance. Mixed effects of interventions were reported on clinical outcomes including weight, body mass index, blood pressure, glycated haemoglobin and cholesterol.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>Inconsistent effect was reported due to a large variety of settings, participants and intervention components although they are considered necessary to address the complex health needs of socioeconomically disadvantaged populations.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>There is inadequate evidence to determine whether any of the intervention types are effective in optimising lipids management for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Research is needed with mixed evidence using real world evaluation and lived experience combined with health economic evaluation, on both mental and physical health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"22-41"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10724464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldad025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has shown significant health inequalities for people with low socioeconomic status associated with more risk factors. This review was to synthesize interventions that targeted CVD risks and outcomes among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations and to understand the impact associated with these interventions.

Sources of data: Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched for records published in the last decade using a systematic search strategy, complemented by screening the reference lists and citation indexes. Nineteen studies were included and a narrative synthesis with the effect direction plot was undertaken in which studies, interventions, participants and outcomes were examined according to the intervention type focusing on behaviours, lifestyle, education, medication and monitoring.

Areas of agreement: No universal definition of disadvantaged socioeconomic status was used with common factors relating to racial/ethnic minorities, low income and low or no health insurance. Mixed effects of interventions were reported on clinical outcomes including weight, body mass index, blood pressure, glycated haemoglobin and cholesterol.

Areas of controversy: Inconsistent effect was reported due to a large variety of settings, participants and intervention components although they are considered necessary to address the complex health needs of socioeconomically disadvantaged populations.

Growing points: There is inadequate evidence to determine whether any of the intervention types are effective in optimising lipids management for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations.

Areas timely for developing research: Research is needed with mixed evidence using real world evaluation and lived experience combined with health economic evaluation, on both mental and physical health outcomes.

解决社会经济弱势人群心血管风险健康不平等问题的干预措施:快速审查。
引言:心血管疾病(CVD)显示,社会经济地位较低的人的健康状况存在严重不平等,风险因素较多。本综述旨在综合针对社会经济弱势人群心血管疾病风险和结果的干预措施,并了解与这些干预措施相关的影响。数据来源:Cochrane CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO和CINAHL使用系统搜索策略搜索过去十年中发表的记录,并辅以筛选参考文献列表和引文索引。纳入了19项研究,并进行了具有效果方向图的叙述性综合,其中根据干预类型对研究、干预措施、参与者和结果进行了检查,重点是行为、生活方式、教育、药物和监测。协议领域:没有使用弱势社会经济地位的普遍定义,也没有使用与种族/少数民族、低收入和低或没有医疗保险有关的共同因素。据报道,干预措施对临床结果的混合影响包括体重、体重指数、血压、糖化血红蛋白和胆固醇。争议领域:据报道,由于环境、参与者和干预组成部分的多样性,尽管它们被认为是解决社会经济弱势群体复杂健康需求所必需的,但效果并不一致。增长点:没有足够的证据来确定任何干预类型是否能有效地优化社会经济弱势人群的脂质管理。及时开展研究的领域:需要利用现实世界评估和生活经验,结合健康经济评估,对心理和身体健康结果进行混合证据的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British medical bulletin
British medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries. Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信