Comparison of two protocols for the generation of iPSC-derived human astrocytes.

IF 3.7 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Patrycja Mulica, Carmen Venegas, Zied Landoulsi, Katja Badanjak, Sylvie Delcambre, Maria Tziortziou, Soraya Hezzaz, Jenny Ghelfi, Semra Smajic, Jens Schwamborn, Rejko Krüger, Paul Antony, Patrick May, Enrico Glaab, Anne Grünewald, Sandro L Pereira
{"title":"Comparison of two protocols for the generation of iPSC-derived human astrocytes.","authors":"Patrycja Mulica, Carmen Venegas, Zied Landoulsi, Katja Badanjak, Sylvie Delcambre, Maria Tziortziou, Soraya Hezzaz, Jenny Ghelfi, Semra Smajic, Jens Schwamborn, Rejko Krüger, Paul Antony, Patrick May, Enrico Glaab, Anne Grünewald, Sandro L Pereira","doi":"10.1186/s12575-023-00218-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Astrocytes have recently gained attention as key contributors to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders including Parkinson's disease. To investigate human astrocytes in vitro, numerous differentiation protocols have been developed. However, the properties of the resulting glia are inconsistent, which complicates the selection of an appropriate method for a given research question. Thus, we compared two approaches for the generation of iPSC-derived astrocytes. We phenotyped glia that were obtained employing a widely used long, serum-free (\"LSF\") method against an in-house established short, serum-containing (\"SSC\") protocol which allows for the generation of astrocytes and midbrain neurons from the same precursor cells.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We employed high-content confocal imaging and RNA sequencing to characterize the cultures. The astrocytes generated with the LSF or SSC protocols differed considerably in their properties: while the former cells were more labor-intense in their generation (5 vs 2 months), they were also more mature. This notion was strengthened by data resulting from cell type deconvolution analysis that was applied to bulk transcriptomes from the cultures to assess their similarity with human postmortem astrocytes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our analyses highlight the need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of a given differentiation protocol, when designing functional or drug discovery studies involving iPSC-derived astrocytes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8960,"journal":{"name":"Biological Procedures Online","volume":"25 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Procedures Online","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-023-00218-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Astrocytes have recently gained attention as key contributors to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders including Parkinson's disease. To investigate human astrocytes in vitro, numerous differentiation protocols have been developed. However, the properties of the resulting glia are inconsistent, which complicates the selection of an appropriate method for a given research question. Thus, we compared two approaches for the generation of iPSC-derived astrocytes. We phenotyped glia that were obtained employing a widely used long, serum-free ("LSF") method against an in-house established short, serum-containing ("SSC") protocol which allows for the generation of astrocytes and midbrain neurons from the same precursor cells.

Results: We employed high-content confocal imaging and RNA sequencing to characterize the cultures. The astrocytes generated with the LSF or SSC protocols differed considerably in their properties: while the former cells were more labor-intense in their generation (5 vs 2 months), they were also more mature. This notion was strengthened by data resulting from cell type deconvolution analysis that was applied to bulk transcriptomes from the cultures to assess their similarity with human postmortem astrocytes.

Conclusions: Overall, our analyses highlight the need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of a given differentiation protocol, when designing functional or drug discovery studies involving iPSC-derived astrocytes.

iPSC衍生的人类星形胶质细胞生成的两种方案的比较。
背景:星形胶质细胞最近作为包括帕金森病在内的神经退行性疾病发病机制的关键因素而受到关注。为了在体外研究人类星形胶质细胞,已经开发了许多分化方案。然而,所产生的神经胶质的性质是不一致的,这使得为给定的研究问题选择合适的方法变得复杂。因此,我们比较了两种产生iPSC衍生星形胶质细胞的方法。我们对使用广泛使用的长无血清(“LSF”)方法获得的胶质细胞进行表型分析,反对内部建立的短含血清(“SSC”)方案,该方案允许从相同的前体细胞产生星形胶质细胞和中脑神经元。结果:我们采用高含量共聚焦成像和RNA测序来表征培养物。用LSF或SSC方案产生的星形胶质细胞在性质上有很大差异:虽然前一代细胞的劳动强度更大(5个月对2个月),但它们也更成熟。细胞类型去卷积分析的数据强化了这一概念,该分析应用于培养物的大量转录组,以评估其与人类死后星形胶质细胞的相似性。结论:总的来说,我们的分析强调,在设计涉及iPSC衍生的星形胶质细胞的功能性或药物发现研究时,需要考虑给定分化方案的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Procedures Online
Biological Procedures Online 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: iological Procedures Online publishes articles that improve access to techniques and methods in the medical and biological sciences. We are also interested in short but important research discoveries, such as new animal disease models. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: Reports of new research techniques and applications of existing techniques Technical analyses of research techniques and published reports Validity analyses of research methods and approaches to judging the validity of research reports Application of common research methods Reviews of existing techniques Novel/important product information Biological Procedures Online places emphasis on multidisciplinary approaches that integrate methodologies from medicine, biology, chemistry, imaging, engineering, bioinformatics, computer science, and systems analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信