{"title":"The Vulnerability of Older Informal Caregivers with Care Needs: Significance of Multidimensional Frailty.","authors":"Eveline Raemdonck, Ellen Gorus, Nico De Witte","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2023.2264859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To improve our understanding of older informal caregivers' (ICs) health, this paper aimed to compare multidimensional frailty and sociodemographic and economic characteristics between (subgroups of) older ICs and non-caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data originating from the Belgian Ageing studies (<i>n</i> = 6054), intergroup differences between older ICs and non-caregivers and between care-dependent and -independent older ICs/non-caregivers were conducted. In addition binary logistic regressions were carried out to determine which variables were related to caregiver status and need of assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all respondents, 14.3% were ICs reporting care needs themselves. Informal and non-caregivers with care needs, relative to those without, more often only (partially) completed primary education, were significantly older, more likely to be female and widowed, found it more difficult to make ends meet, and reported higher levels of frailty in each domain. Moreover, environmental and psychological frailty were associated with an increase in the likelihood of reporting need of assistance among older non-caregivers and ICs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed a particular vulnerable subpopulation of older ICs with care needs.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>It is essential for clinicians to be observant for unrecognized frailty and care needs in older ICs and to develop targeted intervention and prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"976-987"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2023.2264859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To improve our understanding of older informal caregivers' (ICs) health, this paper aimed to compare multidimensional frailty and sociodemographic and economic characteristics between (subgroups of) older ICs and non-caregivers.
Methods: Using data originating from the Belgian Ageing studies (n = 6054), intergroup differences between older ICs and non-caregivers and between care-dependent and -independent older ICs/non-caregivers were conducted. In addition binary logistic regressions were carried out to determine which variables were related to caregiver status and need of assistance.
Results: Among all respondents, 14.3% were ICs reporting care needs themselves. Informal and non-caregivers with care needs, relative to those without, more often only (partially) completed primary education, were significantly older, more likely to be female and widowed, found it more difficult to make ends meet, and reported higher levels of frailty in each domain. Moreover, environmental and psychological frailty were associated with an increase in the likelihood of reporting need of assistance among older non-caregivers and ICs, respectively.
Conclusions: This study revealed a particular vulnerable subpopulation of older ICs with care needs.
Clinical implications: It is essential for clinicians to be observant for unrecognized frailty and care needs in older ICs and to develop targeted intervention and prevention strategies.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including:
-adjustments to changing roles-
issues related to diversity and aging-
family caregiving-
spirituality-
cognitive and psychosocial assessment-
depression, anxiety, and PTSD-
Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders-
long term care-
behavioral medicine in aging-
rehabilitation and education for older adults.
Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
