Evaluation of Candida colonization index, molecular identification, and antifungal susceptibility pattern of Candida species isolated from critically ill pediatric patients: A single-center study in Iran.

Q3 Medicine
Amirhossein Davari, Mohammad Taghi Hedayati, Jalal Jafarzadeh, Bahram Nikmanesh, Mojtaba Nabili, Amir Ali Hamidieh, Mahdi Abastabar, Nasim Ahmadi, Abdullah M S Al-Hatmi, Maryam Moazeni
{"title":"Evaluation of <i>Candida</i> colonization index, molecular identification, and antifungal susceptibility pattern of <i>Candida</i> species isolated from critically ill pediatric patients: A single-center study in Iran.","authors":"Amirhossein Davari,&nbsp;Mohammad Taghi Hedayati,&nbsp;Jalal Jafarzadeh,&nbsp;Bahram Nikmanesh,&nbsp;Mojtaba Nabili,&nbsp;Amir Ali Hamidieh,&nbsp;Mahdi Abastabar,&nbsp;Nasim Ahmadi,&nbsp;Abdullah M S Al-Hatmi,&nbsp;Maryam Moazeni","doi":"10.32598/CMM.2023.1372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Given the high mortality rate of invasive candidiasis in hospitalized pediatric patients, it is crucial to establish a predictive system to achieve early diagnosis and treatment of patients who are likely to benefit from early antifungal treatment. This study aimed to assess the <i>Candida</i> colonization index, species distribution, and antifungal susceptibility pattern of <i>Candida</i> strains isolated from pediatric patients with high <i>Candida</i> colonization index (CI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was carried out at the Children's Medical Center in Tehran-Iran. In total, 661 samples were collected from 83 patients. The <i>Candida</i> CI was calculated according to the descriptions of previous studies. The isolates were identified using polymerase chain reaction-based techniques. The Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute protocol M60 was used to conduct the antifungal susceptibility test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A colonization index greater than 0.5 was confirmed in 29 cases (58% of positive samples) with two children developing candidemia. <i>Candida albicans</i> (n=53, 49.5%) was the most common <i>Candida</i> species in patients with CI > 0.5. Except for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, no risk factors were linked to a high index in colonized children (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Twelve isolates (7.01%) were multi-azole resistant with high MICs against both isavuconazole and ravuconazole and seven strains (4.09%) were echinocandins resistant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In pediatric intensive care units, patients are at risk of fungal infection, particularly candidemia. In this study, more than half of the children with positive yeast cultures had CI > 0.5, and 6.8% developed candidemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10863,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Mycology","volume":"8 4","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Mycology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/CMM.2023.1372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Given the high mortality rate of invasive candidiasis in hospitalized pediatric patients, it is crucial to establish a predictive system to achieve early diagnosis and treatment of patients who are likely to benefit from early antifungal treatment. This study aimed to assess the Candida colonization index, species distribution, and antifungal susceptibility pattern of Candida strains isolated from pediatric patients with high Candida colonization index (CI).

Materials and methods: This study was carried out at the Children's Medical Center in Tehran-Iran. In total, 661 samples were collected from 83 patients. The Candida CI was calculated according to the descriptions of previous studies. The isolates were identified using polymerase chain reaction-based techniques. The Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute protocol M60 was used to conduct the antifungal susceptibility test.

Results: A colonization index greater than 0.5 was confirmed in 29 cases (58% of positive samples) with two children developing candidemia. Candida albicans (n=53, 49.5%) was the most common Candida species in patients with CI > 0.5. Except for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, no risk factors were linked to a high index in colonized children (P > 0.05). Twelve isolates (7.01%) were multi-azole resistant with high MICs against both isavuconazole and ravuconazole and seven strains (4.09%) were echinocandins resistant.

Conclusion: In pediatric intensive care units, patients are at risk of fungal infection, particularly candidemia. In this study, more than half of the children with positive yeast cultures had CI > 0.5, and 6.8% developed candidemia.

Abstract Image

从危重儿科患者中分离的念珠菌定植指数、分子鉴定和抗真菌易感性模式的评估:伊朗的一项单中心研究。
背景和目的:鉴于住院儿科患者侵袭性念珠菌感染的死亡率很高,建立一个预测系统来实现早期诊断和治疗可能受益于早期抗真菌治疗的患者至关重要。本研究旨在评估从具有高念珠菌定殖指数(CI)的儿科患者中分离的念珠菌菌株的念珠菌定殖指标、物种分布和抗真菌药敏模式。材料和方法:本研究在伊朗德黑兰儿童医疗中心进行。总共从83名患者身上采集了661份样本。念珠菌CI根据先前研究的描述进行计算。使用聚合酶链式反应技术对分离株进行鉴定。临床和实验室标准研究所方案M60用于进行抗真菌药敏试验。结果:29例(58%的阳性样本)中,两名儿童出现念珠菌血症,定植指数大于0.5。在CI>0.5的患者中,白色念珠菌(n=53,49.5%)是最常见的念珠菌。除急性淋巴细胞白血病外,没有任何危险因素与定植儿童的高指数相关(P>0.05)。12个分离株(7.01%)对多唑耐药,对伊沙唑和ravuconazole均具有高MIC,7个菌株(4.09%)对棘白素具有耐药性。结论:在儿科重症监护室,患者有真菌感染的风险,尤其是念珠菌血症。在这项研究中,超过一半的酵母培养呈阳性的儿童CI>0.5,6.8%的儿童出现念珠菌血症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Mycology
Current Medical Mycology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信