Identification and characterization of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from pig feces at various production stages.

IF 0.8 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
José D Uezen, Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco, María E Fátima Nader-Macías, Graciela M Vignolo
{"title":"Identification and characterization of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from pig feces at various production stages.","authors":"José D Uezen,&nbsp;Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco,&nbsp;María E Fátima Nader-Macías,&nbsp;Graciela M Vignolo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated, identified, and characterized from pig feces at various growth stages and feed rations in order to be used as probiotic feed additives. Lactic acid bacteria numbers ranged from 7.10 ± 1.50 to 9.40 log CFUs/g for growing and lactating pigs, respectively. Isolates (<i>n</i> = 230) were identified by (GTG)5-polymerase chain reaction and partial sequence analysis of 16S rRNA. Major LAB populations were <i>Limosilactobacillus reuteri</i> (49.2%), <i>Pediococcus pentosaceus</i> (20%), <i>Lactobacillus amylovorus</i> (11.4%), and <i>L. johnsonii</i> (8.7%). <i>In-vitro</i> assays were performed, including surface characterization and tolerance to acid and bile salts. Several lactobacilli exhibited hydrophobic and aggregative characteristics and were able to withstand gastrointestinal tract conditions. In addition, lactobacilli showed starch- and phytate-degrading ability, as well as antagonistic activity against Gram-negative pathogens and the production of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances. When resistance or susceptibility to antibiotics was evaluated, high phenotypic resistance to ampicillin, gentamicin, kanamycin, streptomycin, and tetracycline and susceptibility towards clindamycin and chloramphenicol was observed in the assayed LAB. Genotypic characterization showed that 5 out of 15 resistance genes were identified in lactobacilli; their presence did not correlate with phenotypic traits. Genes erm(B), strA, strB, and aadE conferring resistance to erythromycin and streptomycin were reported among all lactobacilli, whereas tet(M) gene was harbored by <i>L. reuteri</i> and <i>L. amylovorus</i> strains. Based on these results, 6 probiotic LAB strains (<i>L. reuteri</i> F207R/G9R/B66R, <i>L. amylovorus</i> G636T/S244T, and <i>L. johnsonii</i> S92R) can be selected to explore their potential as direct feed additives to promote swine health and replace antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":93919,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire","volume":"87 2","pages":"127-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069149/pdf/cjvr_02_127.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated, identified, and characterized from pig feces at various growth stages and feed rations in order to be used as probiotic feed additives. Lactic acid bacteria numbers ranged from 7.10 ± 1.50 to 9.40 log CFUs/g for growing and lactating pigs, respectively. Isolates (n = 230) were identified by (GTG)5-polymerase chain reaction and partial sequence analysis of 16S rRNA. Major LAB populations were Limosilactobacillus reuteri (49.2%), Pediococcus pentosaceus (20%), Lactobacillus amylovorus (11.4%), and L. johnsonii (8.7%). In-vitro assays were performed, including surface characterization and tolerance to acid and bile salts. Several lactobacilli exhibited hydrophobic and aggregative characteristics and were able to withstand gastrointestinal tract conditions. In addition, lactobacilli showed starch- and phytate-degrading ability, as well as antagonistic activity against Gram-negative pathogens and the production of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances. When resistance or susceptibility to antibiotics was evaluated, high phenotypic resistance to ampicillin, gentamicin, kanamycin, streptomycin, and tetracycline and susceptibility towards clindamycin and chloramphenicol was observed in the assayed LAB. Genotypic characterization showed that 5 out of 15 resistance genes were identified in lactobacilli; their presence did not correlate with phenotypic traits. Genes erm(B), strA, strB, and aadE conferring resistance to erythromycin and streptomycin were reported among all lactobacilli, whereas tet(M) gene was harbored by L. reuteri and L. amylovorus strains. Based on these results, 6 probiotic LAB strains (L. reuteri F207R/G9R/B66R, L. amylovorus G636T/S244T, and L. johnsonii S92R) can be selected to explore their potential as direct feed additives to promote swine health and replace antibiotics.

从不同生产阶段的猪粪便中分离的潜在益生菌乳酸菌的鉴定和表征。
从不同生长阶段和日粮的猪粪便中分离、鉴定和表征了乳酸菌(LAB),以用作益生菌饲料添加剂。生长期和哺乳期猪的乳酸菌数分别为7.10±1.50至9.40 log CFU/g。分离物(n=230)通过(GTG)5-聚合酶链反应和16S rRNA的部分序列分析鉴定。主要实验室群体为路氏利莫西乳杆菌(49.2%)、戊糖球球菌(20%)、嗜淀粉乳杆菌(11.4%)和约翰氏乳杆菌(8.7%)。进行了体外测定,包括表面特征和对酸盐和胆汁盐的耐受性。几种乳酸杆菌表现出疏水性和聚集性特征,能够耐受胃肠道条件。此外,乳酸杆菌表现出对淀粉和植酸酶的降解能力,以及对革兰氏阴性病原体的拮抗活性和细菌素样抑制物质的产生。当评估对抗生素的耐药性或易感性时,在所检测的实验室中观察到对氨苄青霉素、庆大霉素、卡那霉素、链霉素和四环素的高表型耐药性以及对克林霉素和氯霉素的易感性。基因型表征显示,在乳酸杆菌中鉴定出15个抗性基因中的5个;它们的存在与表型特征无关。据报道,在所有乳酸杆菌中均存在对红霉素和链霉素产生耐药性的erm(B)、strA、strB和aadE基因,而罗伊氏乳杆菌和嗜淀粉乳杆菌则携带tet(M)基因。基于这些结果,可以选择6株益生菌LAB菌株(路氏乳杆菌F207R/G9R/B66R、嗜淀粉乳杆菌G636T/S244T和约翰乳杆菌S92R)来探索它们作为直接饲料添加剂促进猪健康和取代抗生素的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信