Functional properties and sensory profile of coffee prepared by different brewing methods.

IF 1.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Food Science and Technology International Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1177/10820132231205625
Jenny A Barrera López, María Hernández Carrión
{"title":"Functional properties and sensory profile of coffee prepared by different brewing methods.","authors":"Jenny A Barrera López, María Hernández Carrión","doi":"10.1177/10820132231205625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coffee is one of the main sources of antioxidants in the diet of many countries. The purpose of this research was to assess the effect of different brewing methods, particle size, and coffee quality on the total phenolic content, antioxidant capacity (AC), and sensory profile of the beverage. The brewing methods yielded differences in taste with higher bitterness in immersion methods. However, the main factors that influenced coffee extraction and taste were particle size and coffee type. A finer particle size allowed for greater phenolic and caffeine (CA) extraction (2.82 mg GA/mL; 1.01 mg CA/mL), resulting in higher bitterness and astringency. Additionally, the type of coffee resulted in a higher CA content in commercial coffee (Specialty: 0.72 ± 0.10 mg CA/mL; Commercial: 1.13 ± 0.14 mg CA/mL). The results showed that using a ratio of 1:20 and 1:15 for commercial and specialty coffee, respectively, yielded differences in AC using the DPPH method (Specialty: 11.54 ± 1.12 µmol/mL; Commercial: 10.20 ± 1.88 µmol/mL) but not with the ABTS method (Specialty: 10.38 ± 1.23 µmol/mL; Commercial: 10.37 ± 1.13 µmol/mL). Similarly to the ABTS method, no differences in the total phenol content of the coffee cup were observed (Specialty: 2.52 ± 0.40 mg/mL; Commercial: 2.43 ± 0.28 mg/mL). Thus, the findings suggest that specialty coffee offers consumers a more balanced cup with less CA content. This allows for more coffee consumption without an excessive intake of CA. However, consumers can adjust the functionality, sensory profile, and CA content of a coffee cup by modifying the particle size and the brewing method used.</p>","PeriodicalId":12331,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Technology International","volume":" ","pages":"248-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Technology International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10820132231205625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coffee is one of the main sources of antioxidants in the diet of many countries. The purpose of this research was to assess the effect of different brewing methods, particle size, and coffee quality on the total phenolic content, antioxidant capacity (AC), and sensory profile of the beverage. The brewing methods yielded differences in taste with higher bitterness in immersion methods. However, the main factors that influenced coffee extraction and taste were particle size and coffee type. A finer particle size allowed for greater phenolic and caffeine (CA) extraction (2.82 mg GA/mL; 1.01 mg CA/mL), resulting in higher bitterness and astringency. Additionally, the type of coffee resulted in a higher CA content in commercial coffee (Specialty: 0.72 ± 0.10 mg CA/mL; Commercial: 1.13 ± 0.14 mg CA/mL). The results showed that using a ratio of 1:20 and 1:15 for commercial and specialty coffee, respectively, yielded differences in AC using the DPPH method (Specialty: 11.54 ± 1.12 µmol/mL; Commercial: 10.20 ± 1.88 µmol/mL) but not with the ABTS method (Specialty: 10.38 ± 1.23 µmol/mL; Commercial: 10.37 ± 1.13 µmol/mL). Similarly to the ABTS method, no differences in the total phenol content of the coffee cup were observed (Specialty: 2.52 ± 0.40 mg/mL; Commercial: 2.43 ± 0.28 mg/mL). Thus, the findings suggest that specialty coffee offers consumers a more balanced cup with less CA content. This allows for more coffee consumption without an excessive intake of CA. However, consumers can adjust the functionality, sensory profile, and CA content of a coffee cup by modifying the particle size and the brewing method used.

不同冲泡方法制备的咖啡的功能特性和感官特征。
咖啡是许多国家饮食中抗氧化剂的主要来源之一。本研究的目的是评估不同的酿造方法、粒度和咖啡质量对饮料总酚含量、抗氧化能力(AC)和感官特性的影响。不同的酿造方法产生了不同的味道,浸泡法的苦味更高。然而,影响咖啡提取和口感的主要因素是颗粒大小和咖啡类型。更细的颗粒尺寸允许更大的酚类和咖啡因(CA)提取(2.82 mg GA/mL;1.01 mg CA/mL),导致更高的苦味和涩味。此外,这种类型的咖啡导致商业咖啡中CA含量较高(专业:0.72 ± 0.10 mg CA/mL;商业:1.13 ± 0.14mg CA/mL)。结果表明,商业咖啡和特色咖啡的比例分别为1:20和1:15,使用DPPH方法产生的AC差异(特色:11.54 ± 1.12µmol/mL;商业:10.20 ± 1.88µmol/mL),但不使用ABTS方法(专业:10.38 ± 1.23µmol/mL;商业:10.37 ± 1.13µmol/mL)。类似于ABTS方法,咖啡杯的总酚含量没有观察到差异(专业:2.52 ± 0.40 mg/mL;商业:2.43 ± 0.28mg/mL)。因此,研究结果表明,特色咖啡为消费者提供了一杯更平衡、CA含量更低的咖啡。这允许在不过量摄入CA的情况下消耗更多的咖啡。然而,消费者可以通过修改颗粒大小和使用的冲泡方法来调整咖啡杯的功能、感官特征和CA含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Science and Technology International
Food Science and Technology International 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Science and Technology International (FSTI) shares knowledge from leading researchers of food science and technology. Covers food processing and engineering, food safety and preservation, food biotechnology, and physical, chemical and sensory properties of foods. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信