Therapist self-disclosure in teletherapy early in the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with real relationship and traumatic distress

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Xiaochen Luo, Katie Aafjes-van Doorn, Vera Békés, Tracy A. Prout, Leon Hoffman
{"title":"Therapist self-disclosure in teletherapy early in the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with real relationship and traumatic distress","authors":"Xiaochen Luo,&nbsp;Katie Aafjes-van Doorn,&nbsp;Vera Békés,&nbsp;Tracy A. Prout,&nbsp;Leon Hoffman","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The usefulness of therapists' self-disclosure (TSD) in psychotherapy remains controversial, and little is known regarding the potential risks and benefits of TSD in times of global crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic and in teletherapy. We examined two independent samples of therapists (<i>N</i> = 1705; Study 1) and patients (<i>N</i> = 772; Study 2) on their perceptions of increases in TSD during the transition to teletherapy early in the COVID-19 pandemic (spring 2020). Approximately 20% of therapists and 14% of patients reported perceptions of definite increases in TSD. Therapists' top reasons for increased TSD were therapists' heightened distress and an effort to connect with patients in teletherapy. Importantly, therapist perceptions of their increased TSD were positively related to subjective vicarious trauma, real relationship, psychodynamic theoretical orientation and negatively with humanistic orientation, but not with age, race/ethnicity, length of clinical experience, working alliance, or professional self-doubt. Patients' perceptions of increased TSD were positively related with patient pandemic-related traumatic distress and their own self-disclosure, but not with patient-reported therapeutic relationship variables. Longitudinally, patients' perceptions of TSD increases predicted higher pandemic-related traumatic distress at 3-month follow-up, after controlling for their baseline traumatic distress and other variables. These results highlighted that increased TSD in teletherapy may be a potential marker for heightened distress in both patients and therapists during a global crisis and a transition to teletherapy. The findings also contrasted the literature and emphasized that therapists, but perhaps not patients, may have considered increased TSD as a reflection of genuine therapeutic connection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2915","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The usefulness of therapists' self-disclosure (TSD) in psychotherapy remains controversial, and little is known regarding the potential risks and benefits of TSD in times of global crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic and in teletherapy. We examined two independent samples of therapists (N = 1705; Study 1) and patients (N = 772; Study 2) on their perceptions of increases in TSD during the transition to teletherapy early in the COVID-19 pandemic (spring 2020). Approximately 20% of therapists and 14% of patients reported perceptions of definite increases in TSD. Therapists' top reasons for increased TSD were therapists' heightened distress and an effort to connect with patients in teletherapy. Importantly, therapist perceptions of their increased TSD were positively related to subjective vicarious trauma, real relationship, psychodynamic theoretical orientation and negatively with humanistic orientation, but not with age, race/ethnicity, length of clinical experience, working alliance, or professional self-doubt. Patients' perceptions of increased TSD were positively related with patient pandemic-related traumatic distress and their own self-disclosure, but not with patient-reported therapeutic relationship variables. Longitudinally, patients' perceptions of TSD increases predicted higher pandemic-related traumatic distress at 3-month follow-up, after controlling for their baseline traumatic distress and other variables. These results highlighted that increased TSD in teletherapy may be a potential marker for heightened distress in both patients and therapists during a global crisis and a transition to teletherapy. The findings also contrasted the literature and emphasized that therapists, but perhaps not patients, may have considered increased TSD as a reflection of genuine therapeutic connection.

新冠肺炎大流行早期远程治疗的治疗师自我隔离:与真实关系和创伤痛苦的关联。
治疗师自我隔离(TSD)在心理治疗中的作用仍然存在争议,在新冠肺炎大流行和远程治疗等全球危机时期,TSD的潜在风险和益处知之甚少。我们检查了两个独立的治疗师样本(N = 1705年;研究1)和患者(N = 772;研究2)在新冠肺炎大流行早期(2020年春季)向远程治疗过渡期间,他们对TSD增加的看法。大约20%的治疗师和14%的患者报告称TSD明显增加。治疗师TSD增加的主要原因是治疗师的痛苦加剧以及在远程治疗中与患者建立联系的努力。重要的是,治疗师对TSD增加的感知与主观替代创伤、真实关系、心理动力学理论取向呈正相关,与人文主义取向呈负相关,但与年龄、种族/民族、临床经验长度、工作联盟或职业自我怀疑无关。患者对TSD增加的感知与患者疫情相关的创伤困扰和他们自己的自我揭露呈正相关,但与患者报告的治疗关系变量无关。从纵向上看,在控制了基线创伤痛苦和其他变量后,患者对TSD增加的感知预测在3个月的随访中与大流行相关的创伤痛苦更高。这些结果强调,在全球危机和向远程治疗过渡期间,远程治疗中TSD的增加可能是患者和治疗师痛苦加剧的潜在标志。研究结果还对比了文献,并强调治疗师(但可能不是患者)可能认为TSD的增加反映了真正的治疗联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信