Exclusion of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from Clinical Trials: An Analysis of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry from 2012 to 2022.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Acta Haematologica Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1159/000533819
Dahniel Sastow, Grace Van Hyfte, Jonathan Feld, Marina Kremyanskaya, John Mascarenhas, Douglas Tremblay
{"title":"Exclusion of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from Clinical Trials: An Analysis of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry from 2012 to 2022.","authors":"Dahniel Sastow, Grace Van Hyfte, Jonathan Feld, Marina Kremyanskaya, John Mascarenhas, Douglas Tremblay","doi":"10.1159/000533819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be successfully treated with intrathecal chemotherapy and carries debatable prognostic impact. However, patients with CNS involvement are commonly excluded from clinical trials at an unknown rate. We systematically evaluated exclusion criteria of AML clinical trials based on CNS involvement and determined associations with clinical trial characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry was searched for interventional adult AML trials between 2012 and 2022 that were phase 1, 2, or 3 and relevant trial characteristics were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,270 trials were included in the analysis with 790 trials (62.1%) explicitly excluding CNS involvement. There was no significant change in rates of CNS exclusion over the past decade. CNS exclusion was higher in trials that included the non-transplant population compared to trials exclusive to the transplant population (66.9% vs. 43.8%, p &lt; 0.01). Non-transplant trials were also more likely to exclude patients with a history of or ambiguous timing of CNS involvement (p &lt; 0.01). Phase 3 trials were associated with more liberal definitions of CNS exclusion (history or ambiguous timing) as compared to phase 1 and 2 trials that had higher rates of excluding patients with only active CNS involvement (p &lt; 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A majority of AML clinical trials, particularly in the non-transplant setting, exclude patients with CNS involvement. Many of these trials, most notably phase 3 trials, exclude patients not only with active but also with any history of CNS involvement. Further research is needed to determine optimal management of these patients in order to increase representation in large clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":6981,"journal":{"name":"Acta Haematologica","volume":" ","pages":"292-299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533819","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be successfully treated with intrathecal chemotherapy and carries debatable prognostic impact. However, patients with CNS involvement are commonly excluded from clinical trials at an unknown rate. We systematically evaluated exclusion criteria of AML clinical trials based on CNS involvement and determined associations with clinical trial characteristics.

Methods: The National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry was searched for interventional adult AML trials between 2012 and 2022 that were phase 1, 2, or 3 and relevant trial characteristics were extracted.

Results: 1,270 trials were included in the analysis with 790 trials (62.1%) explicitly excluding CNS involvement. There was no significant change in rates of CNS exclusion over the past decade. CNS exclusion was higher in trials that included the non-transplant population compared to trials exclusive to the transplant population (66.9% vs. 43.8%, p < 0.01). Non-transplant trials were also more likely to exclude patients with a history of or ambiguous timing of CNS involvement (p < 0.01). Phase 3 trials were associated with more liberal definitions of CNS exclusion (history or ambiguous timing) as compared to phase 1 and 2 trials that had higher rates of excluding patients with only active CNS involvement (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: A majority of AML clinical trials, particularly in the non-transplant setting, exclude patients with CNS involvement. Many of these trials, most notably phase 3 trials, exclude patients not only with active but also with any history of CNS involvement. Further research is needed to determine optimal management of these patients in order to increase representation in large clinical trials.

将中枢神经系统受累的急性髓细胞白血病患者排除在临床试验之外:2012年至2022年美国国立卫生研究院临床试验注册中心的分析。
引言:急性髓系白血病(AML)的中枢神经系统(CNS)受累可以通过鞘内化疗成功治疗,并具有有争议的预后影响。然而,中枢神经系统受累的患者通常以未知的比率被排除在临床试验之外。我们根据中枢神经系统受累情况系统评估了AML临床试验的排除标准,并确定了与临床试验特征的相关性。方法:检索美国国立卫生研究院临床试验注册中心2012年至2022年期间的I、II或III期成人AML介入试验,并提取相关试验特征。结果:1270项试验被纳入分析,790项试验(62.1%)明确排除中枢神经系统受累。在过去十年中,中枢神经系统排斥率没有显著变化。与仅限于移植人群的试验相比,包括非移植人群的实验中中枢神经系统排除率更高(66.9%对43.8%,P结论:大多数AML临床试验,特别是在非移植环境中,都排除了中枢神经系统受累的患者。其中许多试验,尤其是3期试验,不仅排除了有活动性中枢神经系统病史的患者,而且还排除了有任何中枢神经系统病变史的患者。需要进一步研究来确定对这些患者的最佳管理,以增加在大细胞淋巴瘤中的代表性临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Haematologica
Acta Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Acta Haematologica'' is a well-established and internationally recognized clinically-oriented journal featuring balanced, wide-ranging coverage of current hematology research. A wealth of information on such problems as anemia, leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, hereditary disorders, blood coagulation, growth factors, hematopoiesis and differentiation is contained in first-rate basic and clinical papers some of which are accompanied by editorial comments by eminent experts. These are supplemented by short state-of-the-art communications, reviews and correspondence as well as occasional special issues devoted to ‘hot topics’ in hematology. These will keep the practicing hematologist well informed of the new developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信