Critical care, maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 admitted to eight intensive care units during the wildtype, alpha and delta waves of the pandemic across the North West of England—a retrospective review

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kailash Bhatia, Malachy Columb, Bhaskar Narayan, Anthony Wilson, Group of Obstetric Anesthetists of Lancashire; Greater Manchester and Mersey (GOAL-GM) Study Collaborators
{"title":"Critical care, maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 admitted to eight intensive care units during the wildtype, alpha and delta waves of the pandemic across the North West of England—a retrospective review","authors":"Kailash Bhatia,&nbsp;Malachy Columb,&nbsp;Bhaskar Narayan,&nbsp;Anthony Wilson,&nbsp;Group of Obstetric Anesthetists of Lancashire; Greater Manchester and Mersey (GOAL-GM) Study Collaborators","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Few studies have described obstetric and critical care outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19 needing intensive care unit (ICU) admission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and methods</h3>\n \n <p>Obstetric and critical care outcomes of COVID-19 women admitted to eight ICUs from April 1, 2020 to September 15, 2021, in the North West of England were retrospectively analyzed. Women admitted to ICU were assigned to three groups: antepartum women discharged from ICU prior to delivery (antepartum ICU-discharged group), antepartum women who had expedited delivery (antepartum ICU-delivered group) and a postpartum group. Our aims were to describe maternal characteristics and assess how delivery influenced the obstetric and critical care outcomes in these women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During the study period, 615 women tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), of whom 62 (10.1%) needed ICU admission due to symptomatic COVID-19. Pregnancy loss (3.2%) was recorded in two women. Detailed obstetric and critical outcomes from 60 women are reported. Nine antepartum women (15%) admitted to ICU were discharged and continued their pregnancy, 13 antepartum women (21.7%) had expedited delivery by cesarean birth after ICU admission and 38 (63.3%) women were admitted to ICU during the postpartum period. Antepartum ICU-discharged women contracted the SARS-CoV-2 at an earlier median gestational age (23 weeks; <i>p</i> = 0.0003) and needed ICU admission at an earlier median gestational age (28 weeks, <i>p</i> = 0.03) compared with antepartum ICU-delivered (28 and 32 weeks) and postpartum women (35.5 and 36 weeks). Antepartum ICU-discharged women had the lowest rate of mechanical ventilation receipt (11.1%) compared with antepartum ICU-delivered women (52.3%) and postpartum women (44.3%) but the difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.13). No significant differences were observed in the frequency and severity of critical care complications in the antepartum ICU-discharged, antepartum-ICU delivered and postpartum women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Of the women admitted to ICU antepartum, 40% were discharged while remaining pregnant and 60% had expedited delivery. Antepartum women who were discharged from ICU without giving birth may receive lower rates of mechanical ventilation than those who delivered in ICU or admitted postpartum; however, further studies are needed to confirm or refute this association.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"102 12","pages":"1719-1729"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.14681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Few studies have described obstetric and critical care outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19 needing intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

Material and methods

Obstetric and critical care outcomes of COVID-19 women admitted to eight ICUs from April 1, 2020 to September 15, 2021, in the North West of England were retrospectively analyzed. Women admitted to ICU were assigned to three groups: antepartum women discharged from ICU prior to delivery (antepartum ICU-discharged group), antepartum women who had expedited delivery (antepartum ICU-delivered group) and a postpartum group. Our aims were to describe maternal characteristics and assess how delivery influenced the obstetric and critical care outcomes in these women.

Results

During the study period, 615 women tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), of whom 62 (10.1%) needed ICU admission due to symptomatic COVID-19. Pregnancy loss (3.2%) was recorded in two women. Detailed obstetric and critical outcomes from 60 women are reported. Nine antepartum women (15%) admitted to ICU were discharged and continued their pregnancy, 13 antepartum women (21.7%) had expedited delivery by cesarean birth after ICU admission and 38 (63.3%) women were admitted to ICU during the postpartum period. Antepartum ICU-discharged women contracted the SARS-CoV-2 at an earlier median gestational age (23 weeks; p = 0.0003) and needed ICU admission at an earlier median gestational age (28 weeks, p = 0.03) compared with antepartum ICU-delivered (28 and 32 weeks) and postpartum women (35.5 and 36 weeks). Antepartum ICU-discharged women had the lowest rate of mechanical ventilation receipt (11.1%) compared with antepartum ICU-delivered women (52.3%) and postpartum women (44.3%) but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.13). No significant differences were observed in the frequency and severity of critical care complications in the antepartum ICU-discharged, antepartum-ICU delivered and postpartum women.

Conclusions

Of the women admitted to ICU antepartum, 40% were discharged while remaining pregnant and 60% had expedited delivery. Antepartum women who were discharged from ICU without giving birth may receive lower rates of mechanical ventilation than those who delivered in ICU or admitted postpartum; however, further studies are needed to confirm or refute this association.

Abstract Image

在英格兰西北部的野生型、阿尔法和德尔塔疫情期间,新冠肺炎孕妇入住八个重症监护室的重症监护、产妇和新生儿结果——回顾性审查。
简介:很少有研究描述需要入住重症监护室(ICU)的新冠肺炎孕妇的产科和重症监护结果。材料和方法:回顾性分析了2020年4月1日至2021年9月15日在英格兰西北部八个ICU住院的新冠肺炎妇女的产科和重症监护结果。入住ICU的妇女被分为三组:产前从ICU出院的孕妇(产前ICU出院组)、加急分娩的产前妇女(产前ICU分娩组)和产后组。我们的目的是描述产妇的特征,并评估分娩如何影响这些妇女的产科和重症监护结果。结果:在研究期间,615名女性的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)检测呈阳性,其中62人(10.1%)因有症状的新冠肺炎需要入住重症监护室。有两名妇女的妊娠损失(3.2%)。报告了60名妇女的详细产科和危重症结果。9名入住ICU的产前妇女(15%)出院并继续妊娠,13名产前妇女(21.7%)在入住ICU后通过剖宫产加速分娩,38名妇女(63.3%)在产后入住ICU。产前ICU出院妇女在中位胎龄早期感染严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型(23 周;p = 0.0003),并且在中位胎龄早期需要入住ICU(28 周,p = 0.03)与产前ICU分娩(28和32 周)和产后妇女(35.5和36 周)。与产前ICU分娩妇女(52.3%)和产后妇女(44.3%)相比,产前ICU出院妇女的机械通气接受率最低(11.1%),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.13)。在出院的产前ICU、分娩的产前ICU和产后妇女中,重症监护并发症的频率和严重程度没有观察到显著差异。结论:在产前入住ICU的妇女中,40%在怀孕期间出院,60%的妇女进行了加急分娩。未分娩就从重症监护室出院的产前妇女接受机械通气的比率可能低于在重症监护室分娩或产后入院的妇女;然而,还需要进一步的研究来证实或反驳这种联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信