Fetal sex and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus in gravidae with multiple gestation pregnancies

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Alexa M. Sassin, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, Kjersti M. Aagaard
{"title":"Fetal sex and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus in gravidae with multiple gestation pregnancies","authors":"Alexa M. Sassin,&nbsp;Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar,&nbsp;Kjersti M. Aagaard","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>There is an increasing incidence of pregnancies with twin gestations. One outcome more likely to occur with multiple gestations is gestational diabetes mellitus. Studies have suggested that in singleton pregnancies, fetal sex may affect insulin resistance. However, the effects of fetal sex in twins and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus are unknown. We hypothesized that rates of gestational diabetes mellitus and degree of insulin resistance might vary in twin gestations based on the fetal sex pairing: male–male, male–female or female–female. We aimed to employ a large population-based database to ascertain any correlations between fetal sex and gestational diabetes mellitus in multifetal gestations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and methods</h3>\n \n <p>A two-hospital, single academic institution database comprised of over 39 000 participants with pregnancy data from August 2011 to January 2022 was employed. All twin deliveries of live-born neonates &gt;24 weeks’ gestational age from gravidae without preexisting diabetes or twin–twin transfusion syndrome were included. Entries were then grouped based on the fetal sex of the pairing. The presence or absence of gestational diabetes and type of gestational diabetes – diet-controlled (gestational diabetes mellitus classification A1) vs medication-controlled (gestational diabetes mellitus classification A2) – were identified. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed method, and a <i>P</i>-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 1924 twin deliveries that met the inclusion criteria in our database (male–male =652; male–female = 638; female–female = 634). We found no association between fetal sex pairing and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus. There was a significant association between the fetal sex pairing and the type of gestational diabetes mellitus developed, with 32.0% of male–male twins, 33.3% of male–female twins and 58.3% of the female–female twin deliveries associated with medication-controlled gestational diabetes classification A2: male–female vs female–female (<i>P</i> = 0.05) and male–male vs female–female (<i>P</i> = 0.046).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>While gestational diabetes mellitus is of multifactorial origin, we found a significant association between the fetal sex pairing and the treatment needed for gravidae with twins who develop gestational diabetes mellitus. A higher proportion of female–female twins was associated with gestational diabetes classification A2 compared with male–female or male–male deliveries. Further research on the physiology driving this association is warranted.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"102 12","pages":"1703-1710"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.14625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

There is an increasing incidence of pregnancies with twin gestations. One outcome more likely to occur with multiple gestations is gestational diabetes mellitus. Studies have suggested that in singleton pregnancies, fetal sex may affect insulin resistance. However, the effects of fetal sex in twins and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus are unknown. We hypothesized that rates of gestational diabetes mellitus and degree of insulin resistance might vary in twin gestations based on the fetal sex pairing: male–male, male–female or female–female. We aimed to employ a large population-based database to ascertain any correlations between fetal sex and gestational diabetes mellitus in multifetal gestations.

Material and methods

A two-hospital, single academic institution database comprised of over 39 000 participants with pregnancy data from August 2011 to January 2022 was employed. All twin deliveries of live-born neonates >24 weeks’ gestational age from gravidae without preexisting diabetes or twin–twin transfusion syndrome were included. Entries were then grouped based on the fetal sex of the pairing. The presence or absence of gestational diabetes and type of gestational diabetes – diet-controlled (gestational diabetes mellitus classification A1) vs medication-controlled (gestational diabetes mellitus classification A2) – were identified. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed method, and a P-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We identified 1924 twin deliveries that met the inclusion criteria in our database (male–male =652; male–female = 638; female–female = 634). We found no association between fetal sex pairing and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus. There was a significant association between the fetal sex pairing and the type of gestational diabetes mellitus developed, with 32.0% of male–male twins, 33.3% of male–female twins and 58.3% of the female–female twin deliveries associated with medication-controlled gestational diabetes classification A2: male–female vs female–female (P = 0.05) and male–male vs female–female (P = 0.046).

Conclusions

While gestational diabetes mellitus is of multifactorial origin, we found a significant association between the fetal sex pairing and the treatment needed for gravidae with twins who develop gestational diabetes mellitus. A higher proportion of female–female twins was associated with gestational diabetes classification A2 compared with male–female or male–male deliveries. Further research on the physiology driving this association is warranted.

Abstract Image

多胎妊娠的胎儿性别与妊娠期糖尿病的发展。
引言:双胎妊娠的发生率越来越高。多胎妊娠更可能发生的一种结果是妊娠期糖尿病。研究表明,在单胎妊娠中,胎儿性别可能会影响胰岛素抵抗。然而,双胞胎中胎儿性别的影响和妊娠期糖尿病的发展尚不清楚。我们假设,根据胎儿性别配对,双胎妊娠中妊娠期糖尿病的发生率和胰岛素抵抗的程度可能不同:男性、男性、女性或女性。我们的目的是使用一个基于人群的大型数据库来确定多胎妊娠中胎儿性别与妊娠期糖尿病之间的任何相关性。材料和方法:一个由39多家医院组成的单一学术机构数据库 000名具有2011年8月至2022年1月妊娠数据的参与者被雇佣。活产新生儿的所有双胎分娩>24 包括先前没有糖尿病或双胎输血综合征的孕妇的孕周。然后根据配对的胎儿性别对条目进行分组。确定是否存在妊娠期糖尿病和妊娠期糖尿病类型——饮食控制型(妊娠期糖尿病分类A1)与药物控制型(怀孕期糖尿病分类A2)。使用广义线性混合方法进行统计分析,P值≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:我们发现1924例双胎分娩符合我们数据库中的纳入标准(男性=652;男性-女性 = 638;雌性 = 634)。我们没有发现胎儿性别配对与妊娠期糖尿病的发展之间存在关联。胎儿性别配对与妊娠期糖尿病类型之间存在显著相关性,32.0%的男性双胞胎、33.3%的男性双胞胎和58.3%的女性双胞胎分娩与药物控制的妊娠期糖尿病分类A2相关:男性-女性vs女性(P = 0.05)和男女对照(P = 0.046)。结论:虽然妊娠期糖尿病是多因素引起的,但我们发现胎儿性别配对与患有妊娠期糖尿病的双胞胎孕妇所需的治疗之间存在显著关联。与男性-女性或男性-男性分娩相比,女性-女性双胞胎中与妊娠期糖尿病分类A2相关的比例更高。有必要对推动这种联系的生理学进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信