VOLY: The Monetary Value of a Life-Year at the End of Patients’ Lives

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Elizabeta Ribarić, Ismar Velić, Ana Bobinac
{"title":"VOLY: The Monetary Value of a Life-Year at the End of Patients’ Lives","authors":"Elizabeta Ribarić,&nbsp;Ismar Velić,&nbsp;Ana Bobinac","doi":"10.1007/s40258-023-00829-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We explored the monetary value of the end-of-life (EoL) health gains, that is, the value of a life-year (VOLY) gained at the end of a patient’s life in Croatia. We tested whether the nature of the illness under valuation (cancer and/or rare disease) is a factor in the valuation of EoL-VOLYs. The aim was for our results to contribute to the health and longevity valuation literature and more particularly to the debate on the appropriate cost-effectiveness threshold for EoL treatments as well as to provide input into the debate on the justifiability of a cancer and/or a rare disease premium when evaluating therapies.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A contingent valuation was conducted in an online survey using a representative sample of the Croatian population (<i>n</i> = 1500) to calculate the willingness to pay for gains in the remaining life expectancy at the EoL, from the social-inclusive-individual perspective, using payment scales and an open-ended payment vehicle. Our approach mimics the actual decision-making problem of deciding whether to reimburse therapies targeting EoL conditions such as metastatic cancer whose main purpose is to extend life (and not add quality to life).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Average EoL-VOLY across all scenarios was estimated at €67,000 (median €40,000). In scenarios that offered respondents 1 full year of life extension, EoL-VOLY was estimated at €33,000 (median €22,000). Our results show that the type of illness is irrelevant for EoL-VOLY evaluations.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The pressure to reimburse expensive therapies targeting EoL conditions will continue to increase. Delivering “value for money” in healthcare, both in countries with relatively higher and lower budget restrictions, requires the valuation of different types of health gains, which should, in turn, affect our ability to evaluate their cost effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":"22 1","pages":"97 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40258-023-00829-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We explored the monetary value of the end-of-life (EoL) health gains, that is, the value of a life-year (VOLY) gained at the end of a patient’s life in Croatia. We tested whether the nature of the illness under valuation (cancer and/or rare disease) is a factor in the valuation of EoL-VOLYs. The aim was for our results to contribute to the health and longevity valuation literature and more particularly to the debate on the appropriate cost-effectiveness threshold for EoL treatments as well as to provide input into the debate on the justifiability of a cancer and/or a rare disease premium when evaluating therapies.

Methods

A contingent valuation was conducted in an online survey using a representative sample of the Croatian population (n = 1500) to calculate the willingness to pay for gains in the remaining life expectancy at the EoL, from the social-inclusive-individual perspective, using payment scales and an open-ended payment vehicle. Our approach mimics the actual decision-making problem of deciding whether to reimburse therapies targeting EoL conditions such as metastatic cancer whose main purpose is to extend life (and not add quality to life).

Results

Average EoL-VOLY across all scenarios was estimated at €67,000 (median €40,000). In scenarios that offered respondents 1 full year of life extension, EoL-VOLY was estimated at €33,000 (median €22,000). Our results show that the type of illness is irrelevant for EoL-VOLY evaluations.

Conclusions

The pressure to reimburse expensive therapies targeting EoL conditions will continue to increase. Delivering “value for money” in healthcare, both in countries with relatively higher and lower budget restrictions, requires the valuation of different types of health gains, which should, in turn, affect our ability to evaluate their cost effectiveness.

Abstract Image

VOLY:患者生命结束时一年的货币价值。
目的:我们探讨了临终健康收益的货币价值,即克罗地亚患者生命结束时获得的生命年价值。我们测试了被评估疾病(癌症和/或罕见病)的性质是否是EoL-VOLYs评估的一个因素。我们的研究结果旨在为健康和寿命评估文献做出贡献,尤其是对EoL治疗的适当成本效益阈值的辩论做出贡献,并在评估治疗时为癌症和/或罕见病溢价的合理性的辩论提供投入。方法:在一项在线调查中,使用克罗地亚人口(n=1500)的代表性样本进行了或有评估,从社会包容性的个人角度,使用支付量表和开放式支付工具,计算出在EoL为剩余预期寿命增长支付的意愿。我们的方法模拟了实际决策问题,即决定是否报销针对EoL疾病的治疗,如转移性癌症,其主要目的是延长寿命(而不是提高生活质量)。结果:所有情况下的平均EoL-VOLY估计为67000欧元(中位数40000欧元)。在为受访者提供1年寿命延长的情景中,EoL VOLY估计为33000欧元(中位数22000欧元)。我们的研究结果表明,疾病类型与EoL VOLY评估无关。结论:补偿针对EoL条件的昂贵治疗的压力将继续增加。在预算限制相对较高和较低的国家,在医疗保健领域实现“物有所值”需要对不同类型的健康收益进行评估,而这反过来又会影响我们评估其成本效益的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信