Determination of Ce and La in REE-rich ores using handheld LIBS and PLS regression

IF 3.1 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Timur F. Akhmetzhanov, Timur A. Labutin, Dmitry M. Korshunov, Alexey A. Samsonov and Andrey M. Popov
{"title":"Determination of Ce and La in REE-rich ores using handheld LIBS and PLS regression","authors":"Timur F. Akhmetzhanov, Timur A. Labutin, Dmitry M. Korshunov, Alexey A. Samsonov and Andrey M. Popov","doi":"10.1039/D3JA00143A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In this study, we utilized a handheld LIBS (laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy) analyzer (Z-300, SciAps) to quantitatively determine cerium and lanthanum in ores enriched with rare earth elements (REEs). Due to the complex electronic structure of REEs and their presence in laser plasma in multiple ionization stages (neutral, singly- and doubly-ionized species), determining their concentrations using a handheld instrument with relatively low spectral resolution is a challenging task for on-field quantitative analysis. Another issue is the rich emission spectrum of matrix elements of ores, which can cause strong overlapping between lines of analytes and matrixes, preventing quantitative analysis of ores. To address this issue, we employed Design of Experiment based on Latin Hypercube Sampling to construct an artificial calibration set of samples with varying REEs content. We compared univariate calibration and projection to latent structures (PLS) regression for atomic and ionic lines of REEs, as well as for molecular bands of LaO (740.5 nm). We observed a worsening of calibration due to matrix effects for LaO molecules. To validate our method, we used certified reference material of OREAS natural ore samples to simulate the real in-field application of the handheld analyzer. Our study revealed that Ce can be quantified regardless of concentration in niobium REE-rich ores with a relative error of about ±10% if the Ce II line at 462.82 nm is used, which is close to the level of quantitative accuracy. However, predicted concentrations of La in OREAS 460–465 appear to be biased by matrix effects. We conclude that the accuracy achieved in our study is mostly sufficient for qualitative analysis of uranium ores (OREAS 100a–102a). Furthermore, considering the possible matrix effects in La determination, we suggest that it is possible to use OREAS samples as a calibration set instead of artificial samples to build linear univariate regression models, as the lines employed in this study do not overlap. Our results are expected to optimize the procedure of online in-field monitoring of the mining process and provide rapid preliminary analysis for decision-making, with further, more time-consuming, and accurate analysis (<em>e.g.</em>, using ICP-OES/MS) required as necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":81,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","volume":" 10","pages":" 2134-2143"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/ja/d3ja00143a","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we utilized a handheld LIBS (laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy) analyzer (Z-300, SciAps) to quantitatively determine cerium and lanthanum in ores enriched with rare earth elements (REEs). Due to the complex electronic structure of REEs and their presence in laser plasma in multiple ionization stages (neutral, singly- and doubly-ionized species), determining their concentrations using a handheld instrument with relatively low spectral resolution is a challenging task for on-field quantitative analysis. Another issue is the rich emission spectrum of matrix elements of ores, which can cause strong overlapping between lines of analytes and matrixes, preventing quantitative analysis of ores. To address this issue, we employed Design of Experiment based on Latin Hypercube Sampling to construct an artificial calibration set of samples with varying REEs content. We compared univariate calibration and projection to latent structures (PLS) regression for atomic and ionic lines of REEs, as well as for molecular bands of LaO (740.5 nm). We observed a worsening of calibration due to matrix effects for LaO molecules. To validate our method, we used certified reference material of OREAS natural ore samples to simulate the real in-field application of the handheld analyzer. Our study revealed that Ce can be quantified regardless of concentration in niobium REE-rich ores with a relative error of about ±10% if the Ce II line at 462.82 nm is used, which is close to the level of quantitative accuracy. However, predicted concentrations of La in OREAS 460–465 appear to be biased by matrix effects. We conclude that the accuracy achieved in our study is mostly sufficient for qualitative analysis of uranium ores (OREAS 100a–102a). Furthermore, considering the possible matrix effects in La determination, we suggest that it is possible to use OREAS samples as a calibration set instead of artificial samples to build linear univariate regression models, as the lines employed in this study do not overlap. Our results are expected to optimize the procedure of online in-field monitoring of the mining process and provide rapid preliminary analysis for decision-making, with further, more time-consuming, and accurate analysis (e.g., using ICP-OES/MS) required as necessary.

Abstract Image

手持式LIBS和PLS回归法测定稀土矿中铈和镧
在本研究中,我们使用手持式LIBS(激光诱导击穿光谱)分析仪(Z-300,SciAps)定量测定富含稀土元素(REEs)的矿石中的铈和镧。由于稀土元素的复杂电子结构及其在多个电离阶段(中性、单电离和双电离物种)的激光等离子体中的存在,使用光谱分辨率相对较低的手持式仪器测定其浓度对于现场定量分析来说是一项具有挑战性的任务。另一个问题是矿石基质元素的发射光谱丰富,这会导致分析物线和基质线之间的强烈重叠,阻碍矿石的定量分析。为了解决这个问题,我们采用了基于拉丁超立方体采样的实验设计来构建一组具有不同稀土元素含量的人工校准样本。我们将REEs的原子和离子线以及LaO(740.5nm)的分子带的单变量校准和投影与潜在结构(PLS)回归进行了比较。我们观察到由于LaO分子的基质效应导致校准的恶化。为了验证我们的方法,我们使用了OREAS天然矿石样品的认证参考材料来模拟手持式分析仪的实际现场应用。我们的研究表明,如果使用462.82nm的Ce II线,无论富铌REE矿石中的Ce浓度如何,都可以定量,相对误差约为±10%,这接近定量精度水平。然而,OREAS 460–465中La的预测浓度似乎受到基质效应的影响。我们得出的结论是,我们研究中获得的准确性基本上足以进行铀矿的定性分析(OREAS 100a–102a)。此外,考虑到La测定中可能存在的矩阵效应,我们建议可以使用OREAS样本作为校准集,而不是人工样本来建立线性单变量回归模型,因为本研究中使用的线不重叠。我们的结果有望优化采矿过程的在线现场监测程序,并为决策提供快速的初步分析,必要时需要进一步、更耗时、更准确的分析(例如,使用ICP-OES/MS)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
26.50%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Innovative research on the fundamental theory and application of spectrometric techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信