Qian Huangfu, Zhouying Luo, Ying Cao and Weijia Wu
{"title":"The relationship between error beliefs in chemistry and chemistry learning outcomes: a chain mediation model investigation","authors":"Qian Huangfu, Zhouying Luo, Ying Cao and Weijia Wu","doi":"10.1039/D3RP00108C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Errors are natural elements of the learning process and provide a high potential to promote students’ learning outcomes. In recent years, there has been much research about learning from errors. However, we know little about the relationship between students’ error beliefs in chemistry and chemistry learning outcomes at present. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the mechanisms of chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements, adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry and error beliefs in chemistry, and offer suggestions to the improvement of students’ chemistry learning outcomes. We assessed all variables in eight different schools in China (<em>N</em> = 1352 students, Grade 10) and used structural equation modelling (SEM) to check the direct and indirect relationships between four variables. Our findings revealed that (1) chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements, adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry and error beliefs in chemistry significantly positively predicted students’ chemistry learning outcomes; (2) both (a) adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry and (b) chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements acted as significant mediators between error beliefs in chemistry and chemistry learning outcomes; (3) the chain mediating effect of error beliefs in chemistry → adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry → chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements → chemistry learning outcomes was significant. Finally, we discussed the important findings, pointed out the educational implications, acknowledged our study's limitations and suggested directions for future study.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 4","pages":" 1262-1275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/rp/d3rp00108c","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Errors are natural elements of the learning process and provide a high potential to promote students’ learning outcomes. In recent years, there has been much research about learning from errors. However, we know little about the relationship between students’ error beliefs in chemistry and chemistry learning outcomes at present. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the mechanisms of chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements, adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry and error beliefs in chemistry, and offer suggestions to the improvement of students’ chemistry learning outcomes. We assessed all variables in eight different schools in China (N = 1352 students, Grade 10) and used structural equation modelling (SEM) to check the direct and indirect relationships between four variables. Our findings revealed that (1) chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements, adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry and error beliefs in chemistry significantly positively predicted students’ chemistry learning outcomes; (2) both (a) adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry and (b) chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements acted as significant mediators between error beliefs in chemistry and chemistry learning outcomes; (3) the chain mediating effect of error beliefs in chemistry → adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry → chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements → chemistry learning outcomes was significant. Finally, we discussed the important findings, pointed out the educational implications, acknowledged our study's limitations and suggested directions for future study.