The relationship between error beliefs in chemistry and chemistry learning outcomes: a chain mediation model investigation

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Qian Huangfu, Zhouying Luo, Ying Cao and Weijia Wu
{"title":"The relationship between error beliefs in chemistry and chemistry learning outcomes: a chain mediation model investigation","authors":"Qian Huangfu, Zhouying Luo, Ying Cao and Weijia Wu","doi":"10.1039/D3RP00108C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Errors are natural elements of the learning process and provide a high potential to promote students’ learning outcomes. In recent years, there has been much research about learning from errors. However, we know little about the relationship between students’ error beliefs in chemistry and chemistry learning outcomes at present. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the mechanisms of chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements, adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry and error beliefs in chemistry, and offer suggestions to the improvement of students’ chemistry learning outcomes. We assessed all variables in eight different schools in China (<em>N</em> = 1352 students, Grade 10) and used structural equation modelling (SEM) to check the direct and indirect relationships between four variables. Our findings revealed that (1) chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements, adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry and error beliefs in chemistry significantly positively predicted students’ chemistry learning outcomes; (2) both (a) adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry and (b) chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements acted as significant mediators between error beliefs in chemistry and chemistry learning outcomes; (3) the chain mediating effect of error beliefs in chemistry → adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry → chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements → chemistry learning outcomes was significant. Finally, we discussed the important findings, pointed out the educational implications, acknowledged our study's limitations and suggested directions for future study.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 4","pages":" 1262-1275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/rp/d3rp00108c","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Errors are natural elements of the learning process and provide a high potential to promote students’ learning outcomes. In recent years, there has been much research about learning from errors. However, we know little about the relationship between students’ error beliefs in chemistry and chemistry learning outcomes at present. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the mechanisms of chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements, adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry and error beliefs in chemistry, and offer suggestions to the improvement of students’ chemistry learning outcomes. We assessed all variables in eight different schools in China (N = 1352 students, Grade 10) and used structural equation modelling (SEM) to check the direct and indirect relationships between four variables. Our findings revealed that (1) chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements, adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry and error beliefs in chemistry significantly positively predicted students’ chemistry learning outcomes; (2) both (a) adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry and (b) chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements acted as significant mediators between error beliefs in chemistry and chemistry learning outcomes; (3) the chain mediating effect of error beliefs in chemistry → adaptive reactions towards errors in chemistry → chemistry behavioral and cognitive engagements → chemistry learning outcomes was significant. Finally, we discussed the important findings, pointed out the educational implications, acknowledged our study's limitations and suggested directions for future study.

化学错误信念与化学学习结果的关系:一个链式中介模型研究
错误是学习过程中的自然因素,为促进学生的学习成果提供了很大的潜力。近年来,有很多关于从错误中学习的研究。然而,目前我们对学生化学错误信念与化学学习结果之间的关系知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是探索化学行为和认知参与、对化学错误的适应性反应和化学错误信念的机制,并为提高学生的化学学习成绩提供建议。我们评估了中国八所不同学校(N=1352名10年级学生)的所有变量,并使用结构方程建模(SEM)来检验四个变量之间的直接和间接关系。我们的研究结果表明:(1)化学行为和认知参与、对化学错误的适应性反应和化学错误信念显著正向预测学生的化学学习结果;(2) (a)对化学错误的适应性反应和(b)化学行为和认知参与是化学错误信念和化学学习结果之间的重要中介;(3) 化学中错误信念的连锁中介效应→ 对化学错误的适应性反应→ 化学行为与认知参与→ 化学学习成绩显著。最后,我们讨论了重要的发现,指出了教育意义,承认了我们研究的局限性,并为未来的研究提出了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信