Can network analysis ascertain SDGs interlinkages towards evidence-based policy planning? A systematic critical assessment

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Lea Issa, Toufic Mezher, Mutasem El Fadel
{"title":"Can network analysis ascertain SDGs interlinkages towards evidence-based policy planning? A systematic critical assessment","authors":"Lea Issa,&nbsp;Toufic Mezher,&nbsp;Mutasem El Fadel","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The UN Sustainable Development Goals<span> (SDGs) are set on the principle of leaving no one behind, emphasizing their integrated and indivisible nature that requires a holistic approach to achieve sustainable development. While a general consensus persists, that SDGs are closely interlinked, the tools to define or quantify interlinkages remain debatable and challenging with network analysis being advocated as an integrated approach that may offer such guidance. Past efforts explored the potential of network analysis in identifying SDGs interactions however, many gaps remain evident. Relying on a systematic critical assessment, this study identified such gaps through a system's approach that encompassed several sequential steps, including the selection of the geographic location followed by the definition of SDGs goals-targets-indicators and data gathering from accessible data sources. Interactions are then identified with corresponding methods and qualifiers based on network analysis, ending with the synthesis and interpretation for gap identification. Besides identifying existing gaps, the analysis revealed that only a small percentage of reported efforts argued policy implications with limited to no evidence of translation into policymaking. In closure, we proposed a network analysis framework integrating SDGs interactions with evidence-based policymaking towards enhancing SDGs achievement.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 107295"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925523002615","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are set on the principle of leaving no one behind, emphasizing their integrated and indivisible nature that requires a holistic approach to achieve sustainable development. While a general consensus persists, that SDGs are closely interlinked, the tools to define or quantify interlinkages remain debatable and challenging with network analysis being advocated as an integrated approach that may offer such guidance. Past efforts explored the potential of network analysis in identifying SDGs interactions however, many gaps remain evident. Relying on a systematic critical assessment, this study identified such gaps through a system's approach that encompassed several sequential steps, including the selection of the geographic location followed by the definition of SDGs goals-targets-indicators and data gathering from accessible data sources. Interactions are then identified with corresponding methods and qualifiers based on network analysis, ending with the synthesis and interpretation for gap identification. Besides identifying existing gaps, the analysis revealed that only a small percentage of reported efforts argued policy implications with limited to no evidence of translation into policymaking. In closure, we proposed a network analysis framework integrating SDGs interactions with evidence-based policymaking towards enhancing SDGs achievement.

Abstract Image

网络分析能否确定可持续发展目标与循证政策规划之间的相互联系?系统的批判性评估
联合国可持续发展目标以不让任何人掉队为原则,强调其综合性和不可分割性,需要采取整体方法来实现可持续发展。尽管人们普遍认为可持续发展目标是紧密相连的,但定义或量化相互联系的工具仍然存在争议和挑战,网络分析被认为是一种可以提供此类指导的综合方法。过去的努力探索了网络分析在识别可持续发展目标互动方面的潜力,然而,许多差距仍然明显。基于系统的批判性评估,本研究通过包括几个连续步骤的系统方法确定了这些差距,包括选择地理位置,然后定义可持续发展目标目标指标,以及从可访问的数据源收集数据。然后,基于网络分析,使用相应的方法和限定符来识别相互作用,最后进行合成和解释以识别差距。除了确定现有的差距外,分析显示,只有一小部分报告的努力论证了政策影响,但几乎没有证据表明这一点会转化为政策制定。最后,我们提出了一个网络分析框架,将可持续发展目标互动与循证决策相结合,以提高可持续发展目标的成就。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信