Response of symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder to treatment with citalopram or placebo.

Dan J Stein, Elisabeth W Andersen, Kerstin Fredricson Overo
{"title":"Response of symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder to treatment with citalopram or placebo.","authors":"Dan J Stein,&nbsp;Elisabeth W Andersen,&nbsp;Kerstin Fredricson Overo","doi":"10.1590/s1516-44462007000400003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is increasing evidence that the symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder lie on discrete dimensions. Relatively little work has, however, explored the relationship between such factors and response to pharmacotherapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from a multi-site randomized placebo-controlled study of citalopram in obsessive-compulsive disorder were analyzed. Factor analysis of individual items and symptom categories of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Checklist were undertaken, and the impact of symptom dimensions on treatment outcomes was analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factor analysis of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Checklist individual items yielded 5 factors (contamination/cleaning, harm/checking, aggressive/sexual/religious, hoarding/symmetry, and somatic/hypochondriacal). Hoarding/symmetry was associated with male gender, longer duration of obsessive-compulsive disorder and early onset, whereas contamination/cleaning was associated with female gender. Citalopram was more effective than placebo, but high scores on the symmetry/hoarding and contamination/cleaning subscales predicted worse outcome at the end of study while high scores on the aggressive/religious/sexual subscale predicted better outcome. Factor analysis of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Checklist symptom clusters yielded a 4 factor solution, but confirmed that symmetry/ordering was associated with male gender, early onset, and long duration of obsessive-compulsive disorder while high scores on the hoarding subscale predicted worse response to pharmacotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Citalopram shows good efficacy across the range of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptom dimensions. The relatively worse response of symmetry/hoarding to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor is consistent with other evidence that this symptom dimension is mediated by the dopamine system. There may be associations between symmetry/hoarding, male gender, early onset, tics, and particular genetic variants; further work is, however, needed to delineate fully obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes and their underlying neurobiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":520767,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","volume":" ","pages":"303-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s1516-44462007000400003","citationCount":"99","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-44462007000400003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 99

Abstract

Objective: There is increasing evidence that the symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder lie on discrete dimensions. Relatively little work has, however, explored the relationship between such factors and response to pharmacotherapy.

Method: Data from a multi-site randomized placebo-controlled study of citalopram in obsessive-compulsive disorder were analyzed. Factor analysis of individual items and symptom categories of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Checklist were undertaken, and the impact of symptom dimensions on treatment outcomes was analysed.

Results: Factor analysis of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Checklist individual items yielded 5 factors (contamination/cleaning, harm/checking, aggressive/sexual/religious, hoarding/symmetry, and somatic/hypochondriacal). Hoarding/symmetry was associated with male gender, longer duration of obsessive-compulsive disorder and early onset, whereas contamination/cleaning was associated with female gender. Citalopram was more effective than placebo, but high scores on the symmetry/hoarding and contamination/cleaning subscales predicted worse outcome at the end of study while high scores on the aggressive/religious/sexual subscale predicted better outcome. Factor analysis of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Checklist symptom clusters yielded a 4 factor solution, but confirmed that symmetry/ordering was associated with male gender, early onset, and long duration of obsessive-compulsive disorder while high scores on the hoarding subscale predicted worse response to pharmacotherapy.

Conclusion: Citalopram shows good efficacy across the range of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptom dimensions. The relatively worse response of symmetry/hoarding to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor is consistent with other evidence that this symptom dimension is mediated by the dopamine system. There may be associations between symmetry/hoarding, male gender, early onset, tics, and particular genetic variants; further work is, however, needed to delineate fully obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes and their underlying neurobiology.

强迫症症状维度对西酞普兰或安慰剂治疗的反应。
目的:越来越多的证据表明,强迫症的症状存在于离散维度上。然而,研究这些因素与药物治疗反应之间关系的工作相对较少。方法:对西酞普兰治疗强迫症的多地点随机安慰剂对照研究数据进行分析。对耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表的单项和症状类别进行因子分析,分析症状维度对治疗结果的影响。结果:对耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表检查表单项进行因子分析,得到5个因子(污染/清洁、伤害/检查、攻击性/性/宗教、囤积/对称、躯体/疑病症)。囤积/对称与男性、强迫症持续时间较长和发病早有关,而污染/清洁与女性有关。西酞普兰比安慰剂更有效,但在对称/囤积和污染/清洁亚量表上得分高预示着研究结束时的结果更差,而在攻击性/宗教/性亚量表上得分高预示着更好的结果。对耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表检查表症状群的因子分析得出了4个因子解决方案,但证实了对称/有序与男性性别、早发和持续时间长有关,而囤积亚量表得分高预示着对药物治疗的反应较差。结论:西酞普兰在强迫症症状各维度均有较好的疗效。对称/囤积对选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂相对较差的反应与其他证据一致,表明这种症状维度是由多巴胺系统介导的。对称性/囤积、男性性别、早发、抽搐和特定的基因变异之间可能存在关联;然而,需要进一步的工作来全面描述强迫症亚型及其潜在的神经生物学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信