Antimicrobial activity of mupirocin, daptomycin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin and tigecycline against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) from clinical isolates in Korea (1998 and 2005).

Do Kyung Lee, Yuna Kim, Kun Sup Park, Jae Wook Yang, Kyungjae Kim, Nam Joo Ha
{"title":"Antimicrobial activity of mupirocin, daptomycin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin and tigecycline against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) from clinical isolates in Korea (1998 and 2005).","authors":"Do Kyung Lee,&nbsp;Yuna Kim,&nbsp;Kun Sup Park,&nbsp;Jae Wook Yang,&nbsp;Kyungjae Kim,&nbsp;Nam Joo Ha","doi":"10.5483/bmbrep.2007.40.6.881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is a hot clinical issue whether newly approved antimicrobial agents such as daptomycin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin (synercid) and tigecycline are active enough to be used for infections caused by vancomycin resistant bacteria. We performed susceptibility tests for mupirocin, which is in widespread clinical use in Korea, and four new antimicrobials, daptomycin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin and tigecycline, against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from Korean patients in 1998 and 2005 to evaluate and compare the in vitro activity of these antimicrobials. Among these agents, quinupristin/dalfopristin, which is rarely used in hospitals in Korea, showed relatively high resistance to several vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) isolated in 2005. Likewise, daptomycin, linezolid and tigecycline have not yet been in clinical use in Korea. However, our results showed that most of the 2005 VRE isolates were already resistant to linezolid and daptomycin (highest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value >100 microg/ml). Compared with the other four antimicrobial agents tested in this study, tigecycline generally showed the greatest activity against VRE. However, four strains of 2005 isolates exhibited resistance against tigecycline (MIC >12.5 microg/ml). Almost all VRE were resistant to mupirocin, whereas all E. faecium isolated in 1998 were inhibited at concentrations between 0.8 to approximately 1.6 microg/ml. In conclusion, resistances to these new antimicrobial agents were exhibited in most of VRE strains even though these new antibiotics have been rarely used in Korean hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":15113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biochemistry and molecular biology","volume":"40 6","pages":"881-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biochemistry and molecular biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5483/bmbrep.2007.40.6.881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

It is a hot clinical issue whether newly approved antimicrobial agents such as daptomycin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin (synercid) and tigecycline are active enough to be used for infections caused by vancomycin resistant bacteria. We performed susceptibility tests for mupirocin, which is in widespread clinical use in Korea, and four new antimicrobials, daptomycin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin and tigecycline, against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from Korean patients in 1998 and 2005 to evaluate and compare the in vitro activity of these antimicrobials. Among these agents, quinupristin/dalfopristin, which is rarely used in hospitals in Korea, showed relatively high resistance to several vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) isolated in 2005. Likewise, daptomycin, linezolid and tigecycline have not yet been in clinical use in Korea. However, our results showed that most of the 2005 VRE isolates were already resistant to linezolid and daptomycin (highest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value >100 microg/ml). Compared with the other four antimicrobial agents tested in this study, tigecycline generally showed the greatest activity against VRE. However, four strains of 2005 isolates exhibited resistance against tigecycline (MIC >12.5 microg/ml). Almost all VRE were resistant to mupirocin, whereas all E. faecium isolated in 1998 were inhibited at concentrations between 0.8 to approximately 1.6 microg/ml. In conclusion, resistances to these new antimicrobial agents were exhibited in most of VRE strains even though these new antibiotics have been rarely used in Korean hospitals.

1998年和2005年韩国临床分离的莫匹霉素、达托霉素、利奈唑胺、奎努普汀/达福普汀和替加环素对万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)的抗菌活性
达托霉素、利奈唑胺、奎奴普汀/达福普汀(协同酸)、替加环素等新批准的抗菌药物是否具有足够的活性,足以用于万古霉素耐药菌感染,是临床研究的热点问题。我们对1998年和2005年从韩国患者身上分离出的对万古霉素耐药的粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌进行了药敏试验,并对在韩国临床广泛使用的莫匹罗星和四种新型抗菌剂——达托霉素、利奈唑胺、奎奴普汀/达福普汀和替加环素进行了药敏试验,以评估和比较这些抗菌剂的体外活性。在这些药物中,在韩国医院很少使用的奎努普汀/达福普汀对2005年分离的几种万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)表现出相对较高的耐药性。同样,达托霉素、利奈唑胺和替加环素也尚未在韩国临床使用。然而,我们的研究结果显示,2005年大部分VRE分离株已经对利奈唑胺和达托霉素产生耐药性(最高最小抑制浓度(MIC) >100微克/毫升)。与本研究检测的其他4种抗菌药物相比,替加环素对VRE的抑制作用普遍最强。然而,2005年分离的4株菌株对替加环素表现出耐药性(MIC >12.5 μ g/ml)。几乎所有VRE都对莫匹罗星耐药,而1998年分离的所有粪肠杆菌在0.8至约1.6微克/毫升之间均被抑制。综上所述,尽管韩国医院很少使用这些新抗生素,但大多数VRE菌株都表现出对这些新抗生素的耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信