Long term evaluation of field-released genetically modified rhizobia.

Environmental biosafety research Pub Date : 2007-07-01 Epub Date: 2007-07-06 DOI:10.1051/ebr:2007006
Viviana Corich, Alessio Giacomini, Elena Vendramin, Patrizia Vian, Milena Carlot, Giuseppe Concheri, Elisa Polone, Sergio Casella, Marco P Nuti, Andrea Squartini
{"title":"Long term evaluation of field-released genetically modified rhizobia.","authors":"Viviana Corich, Alessio Giacomini, Elena Vendramin, Patrizia Vian, Milena Carlot, Giuseppe Concheri, Elisa Polone, Sergio Casella, Marco P Nuti, Andrea Squartini","doi":"10.1051/ebr:2007006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is the report of the first open field release of genetically modified microorganisms (GMMs) in Italy. It covers ten years of monitoring, and follows in-field GMM dynamics from strain release to disappearance below detection limits, as well as assessment of impact on resident microorganisms. The bacteria released belong to the nitrogen fixing legume endosymbiont Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae, and were engineered with non-agronomically-proficient traits, in order to assess their behavior and fate without GMM-specific positive feedback from the plant. A DNA cassette containing mercury resistance and ss-galactosidase genes was introduced in either plasmid-borne or chromosomally integrated versions, in order to test the resulting strain stability. A synthetic promoter was used to drive the lacZ gene, conferring high catabolic activity to the GMM. Two different wild-type Rhizobium backgrounds were tested, comparing a non-indigenous vs. an indigenous, highly competitive strain. The latter had much greater persistence, since it was able to survive and establish at technically detectable levels for over four years after release. Selection factors, such as reiterated presence of the plant host, or lactose substrate supply, enhanced long-term survival to different extents. The lactose treatment showed that even a single trophic supplementation can surpass the benefits of symbiotic interaction for a period of several years. Concerning impact, the GMMs did not alter substantially the other soil community general microbiota. However, there were some significant differences in microbiota as a consequence of the Rhizobium inoculation. This effect was observed with either the WT or GMM, and was more evident in the release of the indigenous Rhizobium. Moreover, as the indigenous GMM had its parental, dominant wild-type in the same soil, it was possible to evaluate to what extent the GMM version could result in parent displacement (\"self-impact\"), and how much the two rhizobia would additively contribute to nodulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":87177,"journal":{"name":"Environmental biosafety research","volume":"6 3","pages":"167-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental biosafety research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2007006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2007/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This is the report of the first open field release of genetically modified microorganisms (GMMs) in Italy. It covers ten years of monitoring, and follows in-field GMM dynamics from strain release to disappearance below detection limits, as well as assessment of impact on resident microorganisms. The bacteria released belong to the nitrogen fixing legume endosymbiont Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae, and were engineered with non-agronomically-proficient traits, in order to assess their behavior and fate without GMM-specific positive feedback from the plant. A DNA cassette containing mercury resistance and ss-galactosidase genes was introduced in either plasmid-borne or chromosomally integrated versions, in order to test the resulting strain stability. A synthetic promoter was used to drive the lacZ gene, conferring high catabolic activity to the GMM. Two different wild-type Rhizobium backgrounds were tested, comparing a non-indigenous vs. an indigenous, highly competitive strain. The latter had much greater persistence, since it was able to survive and establish at technically detectable levels for over four years after release. Selection factors, such as reiterated presence of the plant host, or lactose substrate supply, enhanced long-term survival to different extents. The lactose treatment showed that even a single trophic supplementation can surpass the benefits of symbiotic interaction for a period of several years. Concerning impact, the GMMs did not alter substantially the other soil community general microbiota. However, there were some significant differences in microbiota as a consequence of the Rhizobium inoculation. This effect was observed with either the WT or GMM, and was more evident in the release of the indigenous Rhizobium. Moreover, as the indigenous GMM had its parental, dominant wild-type in the same soil, it was possible to evaluate to what extent the GMM version could result in parent displacement ("self-impact"), and how much the two rhizobia would additively contribute to nodulation.

对田间释放的转基因根瘤菌进行长期评估。
这是意大利首次公开田间释放转基因微生物(GMMs)的报告。它涵盖了十年的监测,跟踪了田间转基因微生物从菌株释放到消失到检测限以下的动态,以及对常驻微生物影响的评估。释放的细菌属于固氮豆科内共生菌根瘤菌(Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae),并被设计为具有非农艺性状,以便在没有来自植物的 GMM 特异性正反馈的情况下评估其行为和命运。为了测试菌株的稳定性,以质粒或染色体整合的形式引入了含有抗汞基因和 ss-半乳糖苷酶基因的 DNA 盒。用合成启动子驱动 lacZ 基因,使 GMM 具有高分解活性。测试了两种不同的野生型根瘤菌背景,比较了非本地菌株与本地的高竞争力菌株。后者具有更强的持久性,因为在释放后的四年多时间里,它都能存活并建立起技术上可检测到的水平。选择因素,如植物宿主的再次存在或乳糖基质的供应,在不同程度上提高了长期存活率。乳糖处理表明,即使是单一的营养补充,也能在数年内超越共生相互作用的益处。在影响方面,GMMs 并未对其他土壤群落的一般微生物区系产生重大改变。不过,接种根瘤菌后,微生物区系出现了一些显著差异。这种影响在 WT 或 GMM 中都能观察到,在释放本地根瘤菌时更为明显。此外,由于本地 GMM 的亲本、优势野生型也在同一土壤中,因此可以评估 GMM 版本在多大程度上会导致亲本移位("自我影响"),以及两种根瘤菌对结核的贡献有多大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信