On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.

IF 5.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, John T Cacioppo
{"title":"On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.","authors":"Nicholas Epley,&nbsp;Adam Waytz,&nbsp;John T Cacioppo","doi":"10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anthropomorphism describes the tendency to imbue the real or imagined behavior of nonhuman agents with humanlike characteristics, motivations, intentions, or emotions. Although surprisingly common, anthropomorphism is not invariant. This article describes a theory to explain when people are likely to anthropomorphize and when they are not, focused on three psychological determinants--the accessibility and applicability of anthropocentric knowledge (elicited agent knowledge), the motivation to explain and understand the behavior of other agents (effectance motivation), and the desire for social contact and affiliation (sociality motivation). This theory predicts that people are more likely to anthropomorphize when anthropocentric knowledge is accessible and applicable, when motivated to be effective social agents, and when lacking a sense of social connection to other humans. These factors help to explain why anthropomorphism is so variable; organize diverse research; and offer testable predictions about dispositional, situational, developmental, and cultural influences on anthropomorphism. Discussion addresses extensions of this theory into the specific psychological processes underlying anthropomorphism, applications of this theory into robotics and human-computer interaction, and the insights offered by this theory into the inverse process of dehumanization.</p>","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"114 4","pages":"864-86"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864","citationCount":"1990","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1990

Abstract

Anthropomorphism describes the tendency to imbue the real or imagined behavior of nonhuman agents with humanlike characteristics, motivations, intentions, or emotions. Although surprisingly common, anthropomorphism is not invariant. This article describes a theory to explain when people are likely to anthropomorphize and when they are not, focused on three psychological determinants--the accessibility and applicability of anthropocentric knowledge (elicited agent knowledge), the motivation to explain and understand the behavior of other agents (effectance motivation), and the desire for social contact and affiliation (sociality motivation). This theory predicts that people are more likely to anthropomorphize when anthropocentric knowledge is accessible and applicable, when motivated to be effective social agents, and when lacking a sense of social connection to other humans. These factors help to explain why anthropomorphism is so variable; organize diverse research; and offer testable predictions about dispositional, situational, developmental, and cultural influences on anthropomorphism. Discussion addresses extensions of this theory into the specific psychological processes underlying anthropomorphism, applications of this theory into robotics and human-computer interaction, and the insights offered by this theory into the inverse process of dehumanization.

论看人:拟人论的三因素理论。
拟人化描述了一种倾向,即把人类的特征、动机、意图或情感灌输给非人类主体的真实或想象的行为。虽然令人惊讶的普遍,拟人化并不是不变的。本文描述了一个理论来解释人们什么时候可能拟人化,什么时候不可能拟人化,重点是三个心理决定因素——人类中心知识的可及性和适用性(引出的代理人知识),解释和理解其他代理人行为的动机(效果动机),以及对社会接触和归属的渴望(社会性动机)。这一理论预测,当以人类为中心的知识可以获得和应用时,当人们被激励成为有效的社会代理人时,当缺乏与他人的社会联系感时,人们更有可能拟人化。这些因素有助于解释为什么拟人化如此多变;组织多样化的研究;并就性格、情境、发展和文化对拟人论的影响提供可测试的预测。讨论将这一理论扩展到拟人化背后的特定心理过程,将这一理论应用于机器人和人机交互,以及这一理论对非人性化逆过程的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological review
Psychological review 医学-心理学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychological Review publishes articles that make important theoretical contributions to any area of scientific psychology, including systematic evaluation of alternative theories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信