[Her-2/neu analysis--new data?].

T Gaiser, M Hofmann, O Stoss, T Henkel, J Rüschoff
{"title":"[Her-2/neu analysis--new data?].","authors":"T Gaiser,&nbsp;M Hofmann,&nbsp;O Stoss,&nbsp;T Henkel,&nbsp;J Rüschoff","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Her-2 status determination is an essential prerequisite before considering patient eligibility for treatment with trastuzumab. Currently the most common techniques to assess Her-2 status in routine practice are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and dual color FISH for receptor expression and gene amplification analysis, respectively. Despite both methods are well-established in breast cancer there are a variety of yet unsolved questions: 1. Do we really need IHC since interlab variation is still quite high (up to 30%)? 2. Are FISH and CISH equivalent techniques? 3. Are there any precautions to be taken if Her-2 is tested in non-breast cancer samples? 4. What is the value of Her-2 status in blood serum (ELISA)? 5. Do we get better response prediction if new Her2 antibodies, other techniques such as quantitative (q) RT-PCR or multiparameter assays according to downstream signalling pathways are applied? 6. Is Her-2 status still predictive when other therapeutic antibodies than trastuzumab (e. g. pertuzumab) or kinase inhibitors (e. g. lapatinib) are used? These questions will be discussed under the review of the recent literature and under own experiences obtained either by centralized Her-2 assessment in a variety of breast and non-breast cancer therapy studies and within international ring studies between reference labs from Australia (M. Bilous), Canada (W. Hanna), France (F. Penault-Llorcoa), Great Britain (M. Dowsett), Japan (R. Y. Osamura), and Netherlands (M. v. d. Vijver) in which we participated.</p>","PeriodicalId":76792,"journal":{"name":"Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Pathologie","volume":"90 ","pages":"107-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Pathologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Her-2 status determination is an essential prerequisite before considering patient eligibility for treatment with trastuzumab. Currently the most common techniques to assess Her-2 status in routine practice are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and dual color FISH for receptor expression and gene amplification analysis, respectively. Despite both methods are well-established in breast cancer there are a variety of yet unsolved questions: 1. Do we really need IHC since interlab variation is still quite high (up to 30%)? 2. Are FISH and CISH equivalent techniques? 3. Are there any precautions to be taken if Her-2 is tested in non-breast cancer samples? 4. What is the value of Her-2 status in blood serum (ELISA)? 5. Do we get better response prediction if new Her2 antibodies, other techniques such as quantitative (q) RT-PCR or multiparameter assays according to downstream signalling pathways are applied? 6. Is Her-2 status still predictive when other therapeutic antibodies than trastuzumab (e. g. pertuzumab) or kinase inhibitors (e. g. lapatinib) are used? These questions will be discussed under the review of the recent literature and under own experiences obtained either by centralized Her-2 assessment in a variety of breast and non-breast cancer therapy studies and within international ring studies between reference labs from Australia (M. Bilous), Canada (W. Hanna), France (F. Penault-Llorcoa), Great Britain (M. Dowsett), Japan (R. Y. Osamura), and Netherlands (M. v. d. Vijver) in which we participated.

[Her-2/ new analysis- new data?]
在考虑患者是否有资格接受曲妥珠单抗治疗之前,确定Her-2状态是必不可少的先决条件。目前,在常规实践中评估Her-2状态最常用的技术分别是免疫组织化学(IHC)和双色FISH,分别用于受体表达和基因扩增分析。尽管这两种方法在乳腺癌治疗中都很成熟,但仍有许多尚未解决的问题:由于实验室间变异仍然相当高(高达30%),我们真的需要免疫结合吗?2. FISH和CISH是等价的技术吗?3.如果在非乳腺癌样本中检测Her-2,有什么预防措施吗?4. 血清中Her-2水平(ELISA)的价值是什么?5. 如果应用新的Her2抗体,其他技术如定量(q) RT-PCR或根据下游信号通路进行多参数分析,我们是否能得到更好的反应预测?6. 当使用曲妥珠单抗(如帕妥珠单抗)或激酶抑制剂(如拉帕替尼)以外的其他治疗性抗体时,Her-2状态是否仍然具有预测性?这些问题将在回顾近期文献的基础上进行讨论,并根据自己在各种乳腺癌和非乳腺癌治疗研究中的集中Her-2评估以及在澳大利亚(M. Bilous)、加拿大(W. Hanna)、法国(F. Penault-Llorcoa)、英国(M. Dowsett)、日本(R. Y. Osamura)和荷兰(M. v. d. Vijver)的参考实验室进行的国际联合研究中获得的经验进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信