Response of the electron density profiles to geomagnetic disturbances in January 2005

IF 0.5 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Rumiana Bojilova, Plamen Mukhtarov
{"title":"Response of the electron density profiles to geomagnetic disturbances in January 2005","authors":"Rumiana Bojilova,&nbsp;Plamen Mukhtarov","doi":"10.1007/s11200-019-0510-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms is usually investigated by considering the variability of the critical frequency of the F2-layer (foF2) or the total electron content (TEC) because these two parameters are directly measured by the ionosonde stations and the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). In the present paper, however, the reaction is explored by using the vertical profiles of the electron density, N(h), reconstructed by manually scaled ionosonde measurements at the station Sofia (42.4°N, 23.2°E). The mid-latitude ionosheric response to three geomagnetic storms that occurred in January 2005 is presented as this period has been selected because no major sudden stratospheric warming occurred during this month, and the winter 2005 is given in the literature as an example of a “normal” year. Hence the observed ionospheric response to the considered geomagnetic storms can be attributed mainly to the external forcing. Besides the traditional parameters foF2 and TEC, a particular attention is paid to the variability of the peak electron density height (hmF2). This study reveals for the first time that the main contribution to the response of the midlatitude ionosphere to moderate/intense winter geomagnetic storms is associated with significant enhancements of short-period quasi-diurnal oscillations with period of 6–7 hours observed in both foF2 and hmF2. An explanation of the main mechanisms responsible for the distortion of the diurnal ionospheric variability during these storms is offered. This result is especially important for the ground-based HF radio communications.</p>","PeriodicalId":22001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","volume":"63 3","pages":"436 - 454"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11200-019-0510-6","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-019-0510-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms is usually investigated by considering the variability of the critical frequency of the F2-layer (foF2) or the total electron content (TEC) because these two parameters are directly measured by the ionosonde stations and the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). In the present paper, however, the reaction is explored by using the vertical profiles of the electron density, N(h), reconstructed by manually scaled ionosonde measurements at the station Sofia (42.4°N, 23.2°E). The mid-latitude ionosheric response to three geomagnetic storms that occurred in January 2005 is presented as this period has been selected because no major sudden stratospheric warming occurred during this month, and the winter 2005 is given in the literature as an example of a “normal” year. Hence the observed ionospheric response to the considered geomagnetic storms can be attributed mainly to the external forcing. Besides the traditional parameters foF2 and TEC, a particular attention is paid to the variability of the peak electron density height (hmF2). This study reveals for the first time that the main contribution to the response of the midlatitude ionosphere to moderate/intense winter geomagnetic storms is associated with significant enhancements of short-period quasi-diurnal oscillations with period of 6–7 hours observed in both foF2 and hmF2. An explanation of the main mechanisms responsible for the distortion of the diurnal ionospheric variability during these storms is offered. This result is especially important for the ground-based HF radio communications.

2005年1月电子密度剖面对地磁扰动的响应
电离层对地磁风暴的响应通常通过考虑f2层临界频率(foF2)或总电子含量(TEC)的变率来研究,因为这两个参数是由电离层探空站和全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)直接测量的。然而,在本文中,通过使用电子密度N(h)的垂直剖面来探索反应,该剖面是由索非亚站(42.4°N, 23.2°E)手动缩放的离子探空仪测量重建的。2005年1月发生的三次地磁风暴的中纬度电离层响应之所以被选择,是因为这个月没有发生重大的平流层突然变暖,而且2005年冬季在文献中被作为一个“正常”年份的例子。因此,观测到的电离层对所考虑的地磁风暴的响应可主要归因于外部强迫。除了传统的foF2和TEC参数外,还特别关注了峰值电子密度高度(hmF2)的变化。本研究首次揭示了中纬度电离层对中/强冬季地磁风暴响应的主要贡献与foF2和hmF2观测到的周期为6-7 h的短周期准日振荡的显著增强有关。对这些风暴期间造成电离层日变率畸变的主要机制作了解释。这一结果对地面高频无线电通信尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Studia geophysica et geodaetica is an international journal covering all aspects of geophysics, meteorology and climatology, and of geodesy. Published by the Institute of Geophysics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, it has a long tradition, being published quarterly since 1956. Studia publishes theoretical and methodological contributions, which are of interest for academia as well as industry. The journal offers fast publication of contributions in regular as well as topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信