Characteristics of Exceptionally Good Doctors: A Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Survey of Adults.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Patient Related Outcome Measures Pub Date : 2022-08-12 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PROM.S376033
Christoph Schnelle, Mark A Jones
{"title":"Characteristics of Exceptionally Good Doctors: A Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Survey of Adults.","authors":"Christoph Schnelle, Mark A Jones","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S376033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Doctors constitute a significant proportion of a very large number of medical interactions. They are known to vary in the quality of their work, with some having an exceptionally beneficial effect on patients' physical health. In a qualitative study, we interviewed medical doctors on their opinions and experiences of exceptionally good doctors. Their responses and the results from previous research are used as a basis for this proposed cross-sectional survey directed to members of the public on their encounters with exceptionally good doctors. The primary aim of this cross-sectional study is to describe the characteristics of exceptional doctors as reported by a large representative sample of adult patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A mixed qualitative and quantitative anonymous cross-sectional survey of 500 Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) respondents, who have met one or more exceptionally good doctors in their life, will be conducted. Information requested will include reasons for nominating a particular doctor; experience of how that doctor differs from other and average doctors; and 34 5-point Likert scale questions on the characteristics of that doctor and the same Likert questions for the average doctor. An opportunity to report their experience in free-text form will be provided. Sample size will be sufficient to obtain a margin of error of 4%. The authors will provide descriptive statistics, including graphs of the Likert scale question responses; conduct factor analysis for internal validity; investigate satisficing and logical inconsistencies; and explore whether there are multiple types of exceptionally good doctors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Previous surveys of patients' perceptions of doctors exist though none have focused on exceptionally good doctors. The expected results will include a list of characteristics that are important to patients in determining exceptionally good doctors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/b7/prom-13-181.PMC9381005.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S376033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Doctors constitute a significant proportion of a very large number of medical interactions. They are known to vary in the quality of their work, with some having an exceptionally beneficial effect on patients' physical health. In a qualitative study, we interviewed medical doctors on their opinions and experiences of exceptionally good doctors. Their responses and the results from previous research are used as a basis for this proposed cross-sectional survey directed to members of the public on their encounters with exceptionally good doctors. The primary aim of this cross-sectional study is to describe the characteristics of exceptional doctors as reported by a large representative sample of adult patients.

Methods and analysis: A mixed qualitative and quantitative anonymous cross-sectional survey of 500 Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) respondents, who have met one or more exceptionally good doctors in their life, will be conducted. Information requested will include reasons for nominating a particular doctor; experience of how that doctor differs from other and average doctors; and 34 5-point Likert scale questions on the characteristics of that doctor and the same Likert questions for the average doctor. An opportunity to report their experience in free-text form will be provided. Sample size will be sufficient to obtain a margin of error of 4%. The authors will provide descriptive statistics, including graphs of the Likert scale question responses; conduct factor analysis for internal validity; investigate satisficing and logical inconsistencies; and explore whether there are multiple types of exceptionally good doctors.

Discussion: Previous surveys of patients' perceptions of doctors exist though none have focused on exceptionally good doctors. The expected results will include a list of characteristics that are important to patients in determining exceptionally good doctors.

优秀医生的特征:成人横断面调查协议》。
背景:在大量的医疗互动中,医生占了相当大的比例。众所周知,医生的工作质量参差不齐,有些医生对病人的身体健康特别有益。在一项定性研究中,我们采访了医生,了解他们对特别好的医生的看法和经验。他们的回答和先前的研究结果被用作本拟议横向调查的基础,调查对象是公众,了解他们与特级好医生的接触情况。这项横断面研究的主要目的是描述由大量具有代表性的成年患者样本报告的特级医生的特征:将对 500 名亚马逊机械土耳其人(MTurk)受访者进行定性和定量混合匿名横断面调查,这些受访者在生活中遇到过一位或多位特别好的医生。要求提供的信息将包括提名某位医生的原因;该医生与其他医生和普通医生有何不同的经历;关于该医生特点的 34 个 5 分李克特量表问题,以及针对普通医生的相同李克特问题。调查还提供了以自由文本形式报告其经历的机会。样本量将足以获得 4% 的误差率。作者将提供描述性统计数字,包括李克特量表问题回答的图表;对内部有效性进行因子分析;调查满意度和逻辑不一致性;探讨是否存在多种类型的特别好的医生:讨论:以往曾对病人对医生的看法进行过调查,但没有一项调查是针对特别好的医生的。预期结果将包括患者在判断特级好医生时所重视的特征清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient Related Outcome Measures
Patient Related Outcome Measures HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信