S. Barron Frazier, James C. Gay, Shari Barkin, Michelle Graham, Michele Walsh, Kathryn Carlson
{"title":"Pediatric emergency department to primary care transfer protocol: Transforming access for patients’ needs","authors":"S. Barron Frazier, James C. Gay, Shari Barkin, Michelle Graham, Michele Walsh, Kathryn Carlson","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Previous interventions to reduce emergency department (ED) overutilization from non-urgent visits have shown little success. At our hospital, we created an ED to </span>primary care clinic (PCC) transfer protocol for non-urgent ED visits of established patients. Our study analyzed the impact of this protocol on patient encounters.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Chart reviews were conducted for a retrospective cohort of transfers from the ED to PCC from 9/01/17–8/31/18. Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), cost, and need for return to the ED. Cost savings were calculated by comparing encounters with identical primary diagnoses in the ED with internal technical and professional financial data. Secondary outcomes were final diagnoses and primary care services provided.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>374 patient encounters were transferred from ED to PCC. The five most common diagnoses were viral upper respiratory infection<span> (n=80, 21.4%), dermatologic<span><span> diagnoses (n=37, 9.9%), acute otitis media (n=35, 9.4%), </span>pharyngitis (n=34, 9.1%), and influenza (n=34, 9.1%). Overall, total cost savings equaled approximately $100,000. For the top 10 diagnoses, costs were reduced from $29-$46 per $100 of ED costs and LOS was reduced by a mean of 49 min/encounter. For 9 of these 10 conditions, costs exceeded reimbursement in both settings; however, evaluation in PCC versus ED reduced the loss of revenue by 10–68%. Sixty-four encounters (17.1%) received additional primary care services. There were no safety events or inappropriate transfers.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This protocol provided a safe, efficient method for patients to be evaluated in their medical home while reducing non-urgent emergency visits in the ED.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>VI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"10 3","pages":"Article 100643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642200032X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Background
Previous interventions to reduce emergency department (ED) overutilization from non-urgent visits have shown little success. At our hospital, we created an ED to primary care clinic (PCC) transfer protocol for non-urgent ED visits of established patients. Our study analyzed the impact of this protocol on patient encounters.
Methods
Chart reviews were conducted for a retrospective cohort of transfers from the ED to PCC from 9/01/17–8/31/18. Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), cost, and need for return to the ED. Cost savings were calculated by comparing encounters with identical primary diagnoses in the ED with internal technical and professional financial data. Secondary outcomes were final diagnoses and primary care services provided.
Results
374 patient encounters were transferred from ED to PCC. The five most common diagnoses were viral upper respiratory infection (n=80, 21.4%), dermatologic diagnoses (n=37, 9.9%), acute otitis media (n=35, 9.4%), pharyngitis (n=34, 9.1%), and influenza (n=34, 9.1%). Overall, total cost savings equaled approximately $100,000. For the top 10 diagnoses, costs were reduced from $29-$46 per $100 of ED costs and LOS was reduced by a mean of 49 min/encounter. For 9 of these 10 conditions, costs exceeded reimbursement in both settings; however, evaluation in PCC versus ED reduced the loss of revenue by 10–68%. Sixty-four encounters (17.1%) received additional primary care services. There were no safety events or inappropriate transfers.
Conclusions
This protocol provided a safe, efficient method for patients to be evaluated in their medical home while reducing non-urgent emergency visits in the ED.
期刊介绍:
HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology.
The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as:
● Care redesign
● Applied health IT
● Payment innovation
● Managerial innovation
● Quality improvement (QI) research
● New training and education models
● Comparative delivery innovation