Emergency medicine trainees' perceived barriers to training and credentialing in point-of-care ultrasound: A cross-sectional study

Q3 Medicine
Tarek Elsayed, Peter J. Snelling, Erin J. Stirling, Stuart Watkins
{"title":"Emergency medicine trainees' perceived barriers to training and credentialing in point-of-care ultrasound: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Tarek Elsayed,&nbsp;Peter J. Snelling,&nbsp;Erin J. Stirling,&nbsp;Stuart Watkins","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an important tool in emergency medicine (EM), with the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) recommending core modalities as part of fellowship training. In Australia, acquisition of these skills is certified <i>via</i> credentialing but is currently poorly undertaken by EM trainees.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a cross-sectional survey of EM trainees across two academic teaching hospitals in Gold Coast, Queensland, between December 2018 and January 2019, to determine the current state of training and perceived barriers to credentialing in POCUS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-two (59%) eligible EM trainees participated. Although credentialing rates (15%) were low amongst respondents, the majority agreed that it was necessary (69%) and should form part of ACEM training (88%). Amongst these trainees, we identified the desire for increased POCUS training and several barriers including time constraints and the credentialing process itself.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although there is general agreement amongst EM trainees for POCUS credentialing, barriers such as time limitations and technical difficulties were prohibitive for many. We propose the development of an internal structured POCUS training programme within mandatory training time to address these issues.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 4","pages":"160-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644443/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an important tool in emergency medicine (EM), with the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) recommending core modalities as part of fellowship training. In Australia, acquisition of these skills is certified via credentialing but is currently poorly undertaken by EM trainees.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional survey of EM trainees across two academic teaching hospitals in Gold Coast, Queensland, between December 2018 and January 2019, to determine the current state of training and perceived barriers to credentialing in POCUS.

Results

Fifty-two (59%) eligible EM trainees participated. Although credentialing rates (15%) were low amongst respondents, the majority agreed that it was necessary (69%) and should form part of ACEM training (88%). Amongst these trainees, we identified the desire for increased POCUS training and several barriers including time constraints and the credentialing process itself.

Conclusion

Although there is general agreement amongst EM trainees for POCUS credentialing, barriers such as time limitations and technical difficulties were prohibitive for many. We propose the development of an internal structured POCUS training programme within mandatory training time to address these issues.

Abstract Image

急诊医学受训者在护理点超声培训和资格认证方面的感知障碍:一项横断面研究
急诊点超声(POCUS)是急诊医学(EM)的重要工具,澳大利亚急诊医学学院(ACEM)推荐核心模式作为奖学金培训的一部分。在澳大利亚,这些技能的获得是通过资格认证来认证的,但目前新兴市场学员很少接受这些技能。方法:2018年12月至2019年1月,我们对昆士兰州黄金海岸两家学术教学医院的EM学员进行了横断面调查,以确定POCUS培训的现状和感知到的认证障碍。结果52名(59%)符合条件的EM学员参加了培训。虽然受访者的认证率(15%)较低,但大多数人认为这是必要的(69%),应该成为ACEM培训的一部分(88%)。在这些受训者中,我们发现了增加POCUS培训的愿望和一些障碍,包括时间限制和认证过程本身。结论尽管EM培训生普遍同意POCUS认证,但时间限制和技术困难等障碍对许多人来说是令人望而却步的。我们建议在强制性培训时间内制定内部结构化POCUS培训计划,以解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信