Ophthalmic Parameters and Ophthalmoscopy of Burrowing Owls (Athene cunicularia).

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Katarina Bennett, Stephanie Osinchuk, Bianca Bauer, Sangeeta Rao, Miranda J Sadar
{"title":"Ophthalmic Parameters and Ophthalmoscopy of Burrowing Owls (<i>Athene cunicularia</i>).","authors":"Katarina Bennett,&nbsp;Stephanie Osinchuk,&nbsp;Bianca Bauer,&nbsp;Sangeeta Rao,&nbsp;Miranda J Sadar","doi":"10.1647/21-00046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twelve adult burrowing owls (<i>Athene cunicularia</i>) maintained in a managed environment underwent complete bilateral ophthalmic examinations to assess ocular parameters and, if present, describe lesions (n = 24 eyes). Tear production was measured with a Schirmer tear test (STT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with rebound tonometry using established calibration settings (D = dog/cat, P = other species). Retinography was performed for all birds after application of topical rocuronium bromide, and corneal diameter was measured. Menace response was absent bilaterally in 7 of 12 (58.3%) owls; however, this did not appear to be related to the presence of fundic lesions. Ocular lesions were visualized in 6 of 12 (50%) owls. The most common ophthalmic abnormality noted was mild multifocal fundic pigment clumping, suggestive of chorioretinal scarring. Other ocular lesions included 1 retinal tear and 1 incipient cataract. Mean tear production was 6.1 ± 3.0 mm/min. Mean IOPs were 11.6 ± 1.8 mm Hg and 7.1 ± 1.3 mm Hg for the D and P settings, respectively, and these were significantly different (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The IOP results did not differ significantly based on patient age or between the right and left eyes, but a higher mean was obtained from males versus females using the D setting (<i>P</i> < 0.039; male mean 12.1 ± 1.9 mm Hg; female mean 10.9 ± 1.2 mm Hg). Measurements obtained from the STT were not affected by either age or sex. Corneal height was 11 mm and width was 12 mm, regardless of age or sex. The rebound tonometer D setting is recommended for measuring IOP values in this species. Burrowing owls had inconsistent mydriasis following topical rocuronium bromide application to the eye; however, a complete fundic examination was possible with or without complete mydriasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15102,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery","volume":"36 2","pages":"192-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1647/21-00046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twelve adult burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia) maintained in a managed environment underwent complete bilateral ophthalmic examinations to assess ocular parameters and, if present, describe lesions (n = 24 eyes). Tear production was measured with a Schirmer tear test (STT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with rebound tonometry using established calibration settings (D = dog/cat, P = other species). Retinography was performed for all birds after application of topical rocuronium bromide, and corneal diameter was measured. Menace response was absent bilaterally in 7 of 12 (58.3%) owls; however, this did not appear to be related to the presence of fundic lesions. Ocular lesions were visualized in 6 of 12 (50%) owls. The most common ophthalmic abnormality noted was mild multifocal fundic pigment clumping, suggestive of chorioretinal scarring. Other ocular lesions included 1 retinal tear and 1 incipient cataract. Mean tear production was 6.1 ± 3.0 mm/min. Mean IOPs were 11.6 ± 1.8 mm Hg and 7.1 ± 1.3 mm Hg for the D and P settings, respectively, and these were significantly different (P < 0.001). The IOP results did not differ significantly based on patient age or between the right and left eyes, but a higher mean was obtained from males versus females using the D setting (P < 0.039; male mean 12.1 ± 1.9 mm Hg; female mean 10.9 ± 1.2 mm Hg). Measurements obtained from the STT were not affected by either age or sex. Corneal height was 11 mm and width was 12 mm, regardless of age or sex. The rebound tonometer D setting is recommended for measuring IOP values in this species. Burrowing owls had inconsistent mydriasis following topical rocuronium bromide application to the eye; however, a complete fundic examination was possible with or without complete mydriasis.

穴鸮(Athene culcularia)眼科参数及眼科检查。
将12只成年穴鸮(Athene culcularia)饲养在一个有管理的环境中,进行了完整的双侧眼科检查,以评估眼部参数,如果存在,描述病变(n = 24只眼睛)。用Schirmer撕裂试验(STT)测量泪液分泌,用回弹眼压仪测量眼压(IOP),使用已建立的校准设置(D =狗/猫,P =其他物种)。在局部应用罗库溴铵后,对所有鸟类进行视网膜造影,并测量角膜直径。12只猫头鹰中有7只(58.3%)双侧无威胁反应;然而,这似乎与眼底病变的存在无关。12只猫头鹰中有6只(50%)出现眼部病变。最常见的眼部异常是轻度多灶眼底色素结块,提示绒毛膜视网膜瘢痕形成。其他眼部病变包括1例视网膜撕裂和1例早期白内障。平均撕裂量为6.1±3.0 mm/min。D和P组的平均IOPs分别为11.6±1.8 mm Hg和7.1±1.3 mm Hg,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。IOP结果在患者年龄或左右眼之间没有显着差异,但使用D设置时,男性比女性获得更高的平均值(P < 0.039;男性平均12.1±1.9 mm Hg;女性平均10.9±1.2 mm Hg)。从STT获得的测量结果不受年龄或性别的影响。无年龄、性别差异,角膜高度11 mm,宽度12 mm。建议使用回弹眼压计D设置来测量该物种的眼压值。穴鸮在局部应用罗库溴铵后出现不一致的瞳孔;然而,完全的眼底检查是可能的,有或没有完全的瞳孔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery
Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery is an international journal of the medicine and surgery of both captive and wild birds. Published materials include scientific articles, case reports, editorials, abstracts, new research, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信