Single-shot spinal diamorphine for laparoscopic nephrectomy: A retrospective study.

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
British Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-15 DOI:10.1177/20494637221115926
R Vicary-Watts, K Hall, O Passmore-Szilagyi, B Zelhof
{"title":"Single-shot spinal diamorphine for laparoscopic nephrectomy: A retrospective study.","authors":"R Vicary-Watts, K Hall, O Passmore-Szilagyi, B Zelhof","doi":"10.1177/20494637221115926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-shot spinal diamorphine is becoming common practice in urological surgery to aid post-operative pain; however, its safety and efficacy require investigation. This study is a retrospective analysis of 113 laparoscopic or robotic-assisted nephrectomies over 4 years under one consultant urologist. Data were collected on demographic, pre-operative scores, anaesthesia, surgical information, post-operative outcomes and opioid consumption. Two main groups were established: no spinal diamorphine (NSD) and spinal diamorphine (SD). Four subgroups were then created, separating those who received patient-controlled anaesthesia (PCA) or not: Group 1 [general anaesthetic (GA)]; Group 2 [GA and PCA]; Group 3 [GA and spinal diamorphine] and Group 4 [GA, spinal diamorphine and PCA]. Ninety-eight eligible patients were identified. At 6 hours, pain scores were significantly higher for all non-spinal groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05); at 9 h, pain scores were significantly higher in NSD patients compared to SD (<i>p</i> = 0.026); at 12 h, pain scores were significantly higher for NSD patients compared to SD (<i>p</i> = 0.024), and Group 1 compared to Group 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.023). Total opioid consumption in the first 24 h post-surgery was higher in Group 1 compared to Group 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.024). There was no higher incidence of urinary retention, or any neurological complications reported within the SD patients. The study found a reduction in post-operative pain scores with the use of spinal diamorphine prior to laparoscopic and robotic-assisted nephrectomies. The findings may also suggest that pre-operative spinal diamorphine use can reduce the total volume of opioids administered via other routes in the first 24 h post-operatively. It recommends its routine administration but encourages prospective investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":"16 6","pages":"632-640"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637221115926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single-shot spinal diamorphine is becoming common practice in urological surgery to aid post-operative pain; however, its safety and efficacy require investigation. This study is a retrospective analysis of 113 laparoscopic or robotic-assisted nephrectomies over 4 years under one consultant urologist. Data were collected on demographic, pre-operative scores, anaesthesia, surgical information, post-operative outcomes and opioid consumption. Two main groups were established: no spinal diamorphine (NSD) and spinal diamorphine (SD). Four subgroups were then created, separating those who received patient-controlled anaesthesia (PCA) or not: Group 1 [general anaesthetic (GA)]; Group 2 [GA and PCA]; Group 3 [GA and spinal diamorphine] and Group 4 [GA, spinal diamorphine and PCA]. Ninety-eight eligible patients were identified. At 6 hours, pain scores were significantly higher for all non-spinal groups (p < 0.05); at 9 h, pain scores were significantly higher in NSD patients compared to SD (p = 0.026); at 12 h, pain scores were significantly higher for NSD patients compared to SD (p = 0.024), and Group 1 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.023). Total opioid consumption in the first 24 h post-surgery was higher in Group 1 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.024). There was no higher incidence of urinary retention, or any neurological complications reported within the SD patients. The study found a reduction in post-operative pain scores with the use of spinal diamorphine prior to laparoscopic and robotic-assisted nephrectomies. The findings may also suggest that pre-operative spinal diamorphine use can reduce the total volume of opioids administered via other routes in the first 24 h post-operatively. It recommends its routine administration but encourages prospective investigation.

单针脊髓吗啡用于腹腔镜肾切除术:回顾性研究。
单针脊髓二吗啡已成为泌尿外科治疗术后疼痛的常用方法;然而,其安全性和有效性有待进一步研究。本研究是对一位泌尿科顾问医师4年来113例腹腔镜或机器人辅助肾切除术的回顾性分析。收集了人口统计学、术前评分、麻醉、手术信息、术后结果和阿片类药物消耗的数据。主要分为两组:无脊髓二吗啡组(NSD)和脊髓二吗啡组(SD)。然后创建四个亚组,将接受或未接受患者控制麻醉(PCA)的患者分开:第一组[全身麻醉(GA)];第二组[GA和PCA];第3组[GA、脊髓二吗啡]和第4组[GA、脊髓二吗啡和PCA]。确定了98例符合条件的患者。6小时时,所有非脊柱组疼痛评分均显著高于对照组(p < 0.05);9 h时,NSD患者的疼痛评分明显高于SD患者(p = 0.026);12 h时,NSD患者的疼痛评分明显高于SD (p = 0.024), 1组患者的疼痛评分明显高于3组(p = 0.023)。1组术后24 h阿片类药物总消耗量高于3组(p = 0.024)。在SD患者中没有更高的尿潴留发生率,或任何神经系统并发症的报道。研究发现,在腹腔镜和机器人辅助肾切除术前使用脊髓二吗啡可降低术后疼痛评分。研究结果还表明,术前使用脊髓二吗啡可以减少术后24小时内通过其他途径给药的阿片类药物的总量。它建议其日常管理,但鼓励前瞻性调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信