Ketamine-medetomidine compared to tiletamine-zolazepam-medetomidine for immobilisation of semi-captive cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus).

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
R K Buck, A S W Tordiffe, G E Zeiler
{"title":"Ketamine-medetomidine compared to tiletamine-zolazepam-medetomidine for immobilisation of semi-captive cheetahs (<i>Acinonyx jubatus</i>).","authors":"R K Buck,&nbsp;A S W Tordiffe,&nbsp;G E Zeiler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The immobilisation time and cardiopulmonary effects of ketamine-medetomidine (KM) and tiletamine-zolazepam-medetomidine (TZM) were compared in semi-captive cheetahs (<i>Acinonyx jubatus</i>). Seven healthy adult cheetahs were included in a randomised prospective crossover study. Each cheetah was immobilised on two occasions by remote injection, once with a combination of ketamine (4.93 ± 0.75 mg/kg) and medetomidine (0.038 ± 0.003 mg/kg) (KM) and once with tiletamine-zolazepam (1.16 ± 0.12 mg/kg) and medetomidine (0.039 ± 0.002 mg/kg) (TZM). Time to safe approach, characterised by absent responses to an ear flick and tail tug, was recorded as the immobilisation time. Following immobilisation, cardiopulmonary parameters were recorded, and an arterial blood gas sample analysed. Data is reported as mean ± SD and compared using a general linear mixed model (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Immobilisation times were no different between combinations, 11.4 ± 5.7 minutes for KM and 13.2 ± 4.6 minutes for TZM (<i>p</i> = 0.528). Systolic blood pressure was 218 ± 22 mmHg for KM and 210 ± 28 mmHg for TZM (<i>p</i> = 0.594). There was moderate hypoxaemia with both combinations with arterial oxygen partial pressure of 58.4 ± 6.6 mmHg for KM and 61.3 ± 4.2 mmHg for TZM (<i>p</i> = 0.368). Haematocrit was higher with KM (40.7 ± 2.5) than TZM (35.8 ± 2.8, <i>p</i> = 0.007). There were differences in electrolytes, with TZM resulting in higher serum potassium (4.3 ± 0.2 mmol/L, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and glucose (11.8 ± 2.9 mmol/L, <i>p</i> = 0.039) than KM. Both combinations provided acceptable immobilisation for field use, although severe hypertension was a consistent finding. Supplementation with oxygen is recommended with both combinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17467,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the South African Veterinary Association","volume":"93 1","pages":"25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the South African Veterinary Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The immobilisation time and cardiopulmonary effects of ketamine-medetomidine (KM) and tiletamine-zolazepam-medetomidine (TZM) were compared in semi-captive cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus). Seven healthy adult cheetahs were included in a randomised prospective crossover study. Each cheetah was immobilised on two occasions by remote injection, once with a combination of ketamine (4.93 ± 0.75 mg/kg) and medetomidine (0.038 ± 0.003 mg/kg) (KM) and once with tiletamine-zolazepam (1.16 ± 0.12 mg/kg) and medetomidine (0.039 ± 0.002 mg/kg) (TZM). Time to safe approach, characterised by absent responses to an ear flick and tail tug, was recorded as the immobilisation time. Following immobilisation, cardiopulmonary parameters were recorded, and an arterial blood gas sample analysed. Data is reported as mean ± SD and compared using a general linear mixed model (p < 0.05). Immobilisation times were no different between combinations, 11.4 ± 5.7 minutes for KM and 13.2 ± 4.6 minutes for TZM (p = 0.528). Systolic blood pressure was 218 ± 22 mmHg for KM and 210 ± 28 mmHg for TZM (p = 0.594). There was moderate hypoxaemia with both combinations with arterial oxygen partial pressure of 58.4 ± 6.6 mmHg for KM and 61.3 ± 4.2 mmHg for TZM (p = 0.368). Haematocrit was higher with KM (40.7 ± 2.5) than TZM (35.8 ± 2.8, p = 0.007). There were differences in electrolytes, with TZM resulting in higher serum potassium (4.3 ± 0.2 mmol/L, p < 0.001) and glucose (11.8 ± 2.9 mmol/L, p = 0.039) than KM. Both combinations provided acceptable immobilisation for field use, although severe hypertension was a consistent finding. Supplementation with oxygen is recommended with both combinations.

氯胺酮-美托咪定与替乐胺酮-唑拉西泮-美托咪定在半圈养猎豹(Acinonyx jubatus)固定中的比较。
摘要:比较了氯胺酮-美托咪定(KM)和替莱胺酮-唑拉西泮-美托咪定(TZM)在半圈养猎豹(Acinonyx jubatus)体内的固定时间和心肺效果。7只健康成年猎豹被纳入一项随机前瞻性交叉研究。对每只猎豹进行两次远程注射固定,一次是氯胺酮(4.93±0.75 mg/kg)和美托咪定(0.038±0.003 mg/kg) (KM)联合固定,一次是替乐胺-唑拉西泮(1.16±0.12 mg/kg)和美托咪定(0.039±0.002 mg/kg) (TZM)联合固定。安全接近的时间,其特征是对轻击耳朵和拖拽尾巴没有反应,被记录为固定时间。固定后,记录心肺参数,并分析动脉血气样本。数据以均数±标准差报告,采用一般线性混合模型进行比较(p < 0.05)。两组患者固定时间无差异,KM组为11.4±5.7 min, TZM组为13.2±4.6 min (p = 0.528)。KM组收缩压为218±22 mmHg, TZM组收缩压为210±28 mmHg (p = 0.594)。两组患者均出现中度低氧血症,KM组动脉氧分压58.4±6.6 mmHg, TZM组动脉氧分压61.3±4.2 mmHg (p = 0.368)。KM组红细胞压积(40.7±2.5)高于TZM组(35.8±2.8,p = 0.007)。电解质存在差异,TZM组血清钾(4.3±0.2 mmol/L, p < 0.001)和血糖(11.8±2.9 mmol/L, p = 0.039)高于KM组。这两种组合都提供了可接受的现场使用固定,尽管严重的高血压是一致的发现。两种组合均建议补充氧气。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the South African Veterinary Association is a contemporary multi-disciplinary scientific mouthpiece for Veterinary Science in South Africa and abroad. It provides veterinarians in South Africa and elsewhere in the world with current scientific information across the full spectrum of veterinary science. Its content therefore includes reviews on various topics, clinical and non-clinical articles, research articles and short communications as well as case reports and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信