Conceptualization and development of a questionnaire to determine physical activity barriers.

Physical activity and nutrition Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-30 DOI:10.20463/pan.2022.0009
Maryam Selk-Ghaffari, Bahar Hassanmirzaei, Amin Nakhostin-Ansari, Behnaz Mahdaviani, Mohammad Saeid Khonji, Reyhaneh Aghajani, Maedeh Gholami-Mehrabadi, Afifeh Khosravi, Ramin Kordi
{"title":"Conceptualization and development of a questionnaire to determine physical activity barriers.","authors":"Maryam Selk-Ghaffari,&nbsp;Bahar Hassanmirzaei,&nbsp;Amin Nakhostin-Ansari,&nbsp;Behnaz Mahdaviani,&nbsp;Mohammad Saeid Khonji,&nbsp;Reyhaneh Aghajani,&nbsp;Maedeh Gholami-Mehrabadi,&nbsp;Afifeh Khosravi,&nbsp;Ramin Kordi","doi":"10.20463/pan.2022.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Considering the role of physical activity on public health and the high prevalence of physical inactivity worldwide, determining physical activity barriers is critical and will be a road map for future planning. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive questionnaire to determine physical activity barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By reviewing previous studies, the main domains of the questionnaire were established. A physical activity expert interviewed 20 individuals aged 18 to 65 years. The results were evaluated by an expert panel for a content validity index. Face validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency were established on 204 individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The content validity index in all items was within the acceptable range (&gt;0.85). Face validity was appropriate, and the misunderstanding index was &lt; 20% in all items. Test-retest reliability in the final questionnaire in all items based on Cohen's kappa was &gt; 0.20, indicating fair agreement. Internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of 0.63 was within the acceptable range.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed that the newly designed survey is valid, accurate, and reliable. The use of this comprehensive tool by policymakers would help them properly identify the perceived barriers, and thus perform better physical activity interventions as promotional health programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":74444,"journal":{"name":"Physical activity and nutrition","volume":"26 2","pages":"17-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/01/pan-2022-0009.PMC9395253.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical activity and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20463/pan.2022.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Considering the role of physical activity on public health and the high prevalence of physical inactivity worldwide, determining physical activity barriers is critical and will be a road map for future planning. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive questionnaire to determine physical activity barriers.

Methods: By reviewing previous studies, the main domains of the questionnaire were established. A physical activity expert interviewed 20 individuals aged 18 to 65 years. The results were evaluated by an expert panel for a content validity index. Face validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency were established on 204 individuals.

Results: The content validity index in all items was within the acceptable range (>0.85). Face validity was appropriate, and the misunderstanding index was < 20% in all items. Test-retest reliability in the final questionnaire in all items based on Cohen's kappa was > 0.20, indicating fair agreement. Internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of 0.63 was within the acceptable range.

Conclusion: The study revealed that the newly designed survey is valid, accurate, and reliable. The use of this comprehensive tool by policymakers would help them properly identify the perceived barriers, and thus perform better physical activity interventions as promotional health programs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

概念化和开发一份调查问卷,以确定身体活动障碍。
目的:考虑到身体活动对公共健康的作用和世界范围内缺乏身体活动的高流行率,确定身体活动障碍至关重要,并将成为未来规划的路线图。本研究旨在制定一份全面的问卷来确定身体活动障碍。方法:在回顾前人研究的基础上,确定问卷的主要域。一位体育运动专家采访了20位年龄在18到65岁之间的人。结果由专家小组评估内容效度指数。对204名受试者进行了面孔效度、重测信度和内部一致性的测试。结果:各项目的内容效度指标均在可接受范围内(>0.85)。面孔效度适宜,误解指数为<所有商品的20%。基于Cohen’s kappa的最终问卷中所有项目的重测信度为>0.20,表示一致。与Cronbach's alpha 0.63的内部一致性在可接受范围内。结论:新设计的调查问卷有效、准确、可靠。政策制定者使用这一综合工具将有助于他们正确识别感知到的障碍,从而将更好的体育活动干预作为促进健康的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信