Comparison of systemic and peripheral responses during high-intensity interval exercise under voluntary hypoventilation vs. hypoxic conditions.

Physical activity and nutrition Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-30 DOI:10.20463/pan.2022.0008
Ayano Imai, Keiichi Yamaguchi, Kazushige Goto
{"title":"Comparison of systemic and peripheral responses during high-intensity interval exercise under voluntary hypoventilation vs. hypoxic conditions.","authors":"Ayano Imai,&nbsp;Keiichi Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Kazushige Goto","doi":"10.20463/pan.2022.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine the systemic and peripheral responses to high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) with voluntary hypoventilation at low lung volume (VHL) or HIIE under hypoxic conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten male participants completed a single session of HIIE (three sets of 6 × 8-s high-intensity pedaling at 170% of maximal oxygen uptake [VO2max]) under three different conditions: normoxia with normal breathing (NOR: 23 °C, 20.9% of fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2]), hypoxia with normal breathing (HYP: 23 °C, 14.5% FiO2), and normoxia with VHL (VHL: 23 °C, 20.9% FiO2). A randomized crossover design was used. Power output, arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate, and muscle oxygenation were monitored during the exercise and the 16-s recovery. Muscle blood flow (mBF) of the vastus lateralis was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SpO2 during the exercise and the 16-s recovery in the VHL group was significantly lower than in that of the NOR group. However, this parameter in the VHL group was significantly higher than that of the HYP group (NOR: 94.9 ± 0.4%, HYP: 82.8 ± 1.2%, VHL: 90.4 ± 0.5%; p &lt; 0.001). Muscle oxygen saturation was significantly lower in the HYP group than those in the VHL and NOR groups (NOR: 79.6 ± 17.4%, HYP: 65.5 ± 7.7%, VHL: 74.4 ± 7.8%; p = 0.024). No significant difference in this parameter was observed between the VHL and NOR groups (p &gt; 0.05). Additionally, the exercise-induced increase in mBF did not differ significantly among three groups (p &gt; 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIIE-induced SpO2 decrease was smaller under hypoxic conditions than during VHL. Moreover, mBF was not enhanced by the addition of VHL during HIIE.</p>","PeriodicalId":74444,"journal":{"name":"Physical activity and nutrition","volume":"26 2","pages":"8-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/fd/pan-2022-0008.PMC9395251.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical activity and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20463/pan.2022.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the systemic and peripheral responses to high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) with voluntary hypoventilation at low lung volume (VHL) or HIIE under hypoxic conditions.

Methods: Ten male participants completed a single session of HIIE (three sets of 6 × 8-s high-intensity pedaling at 170% of maximal oxygen uptake [VO2max]) under three different conditions: normoxia with normal breathing (NOR: 23 °C, 20.9% of fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2]), hypoxia with normal breathing (HYP: 23 °C, 14.5% FiO2), and normoxia with VHL (VHL: 23 °C, 20.9% FiO2). A randomized crossover design was used. Power output, arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate, and muscle oxygenation were monitored during the exercise and the 16-s recovery. Muscle blood flow (mBF) of the vastus lateralis was also evaluated.

Results: SpO2 during the exercise and the 16-s recovery in the VHL group was significantly lower than in that of the NOR group. However, this parameter in the VHL group was significantly higher than that of the HYP group (NOR: 94.9 ± 0.4%, HYP: 82.8 ± 1.2%, VHL: 90.4 ± 0.5%; p < 0.001). Muscle oxygen saturation was significantly lower in the HYP group than those in the VHL and NOR groups (NOR: 79.6 ± 17.4%, HYP: 65.5 ± 7.7%, VHL: 74.4 ± 7.8%; p = 0.024). No significant difference in this parameter was observed between the VHL and NOR groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, the exercise-induced increase in mBF did not differ significantly among three groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: HIIE-induced SpO2 decrease was smaller under hypoxic conditions than during VHL. Moreover, mBF was not enhanced by the addition of VHL during HIIE.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自主低通气与低氧条件下高强度间歇运动的全身和外周反应比较。
目的:本研究旨在确定低肺容量(VHL)自发性低通气高强度间歇运动(HIIE)或低氧条件下HIIE的全身和外周反应。方法:10名男性参与者在三种不同的条件下完成了单次HIIE(3组6 × 8-s高强度蹬车,最大摄氧量为170%):正常呼吸的正常缺氧(NOR: 23°C,吸入氧[FiO2]的20.9%),正常呼吸的缺氧(HYP: 23°C, FiO2的14.5%)和正常呼吸的正常缺氧(VHL: 23°C, FiO2的20.9%)。采用随机交叉设计。在运动和16-s恢复期间监测功率输出、动脉血氧饱和度(SpO2)、心率和肌肉氧合。还评估了股外侧肌的肌肉血流量(mBF)。结果:VHL组运动时SpO2及16-s恢复明显低于NOR组。但VHL组该参数明显高于HYP组(NOR: 94.9±0.4%,HYP: 82.8±1.2%,VHL: 90.4±0.5%;p & lt;0.001)。HYP组肌肉氧饱和度明显低于VHL组和NOR组(NOR: 79.6±17.4%,HYP: 65.5±7.7%,VHL: 74.4±7.8%;P = 0.024)。VHL组和NOR组在该参数上无显著差异(p >0.05)。此外,运动引起的mBF增加在三组之间没有显著差异(p >0.05)。结论:低氧条件下hiie诱导的SpO2下降幅度小于VHL。此外,在HIIE期间,添加VHL并没有增强mBF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信