[Symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children of day care age].

IF 0.3
Juliane Wurm, Ann-Sophie Lehfeld, Gianni Varnaccia, Helena Iwanowski, Bianca Finkel, Anja Schienkiewitz, Hanna Perlitz, Anne-Kathrin Mareike Loer, Barbara Wess, Andrea Franke, Antje Hüther, Tim Kuttig, Anna Sandoni, Ulrike Kubisch, Susanne Jordan, Walter Haas, Udo Buchholz, Julika Loss
{"title":"[Symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children of day care age].","authors":"Juliane Wurm,&nbsp;Ann-Sophie Lehfeld,&nbsp;Gianni Varnaccia,&nbsp;Helena Iwanowski,&nbsp;Bianca Finkel,&nbsp;Anja Schienkiewitz,&nbsp;Hanna Perlitz,&nbsp;Anne-Kathrin Mareike Loer,&nbsp;Barbara Wess,&nbsp;Andrea Franke,&nbsp;Antje Hüther,&nbsp;Tim Kuttig,&nbsp;Anna Sandoni,&nbsp;Ulrike Kubisch,&nbsp;Susanne Jordan,&nbsp;Walter Haas,&nbsp;Udo Buchholz,&nbsp;Julika Loss","doi":"10.1007/s00112-022-01640-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The symptoms of SARS-CoV‑2 infections in children are mostly mild; however, the symptoms are highly variable. There are only a few studies on non-hospitalized children. The clinical picture described in hospitalized children cannot be transferred to non-hospitalized children and the frequency of certain symptoms in children may thus be overestimated. Furthermore, most studies include a broad age group (up to 18 years). The symptoms of younger children have so far been described in less detail.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The paper aims to describe the frequency of COVID-19 symptoms in younger children (1-6 years old). Data of the two modules COALA (<i>Corona: Anlassbezogene Untersuchungen in Kitas</i>) and CATS (Corona-KiTa surveillance) of the Corona-KiTa study are evaluated and the results of the two studies are compared and discussed against the background of the different methodologies. In the COALA study, the type and frequency of symptoms of children infected with SARS-CoV‑2 are evaluated and compared to symptoms of children who tested negative for SARS-CoV‑2. Symptom frequencies of SARS-CoV‑2 infected children of the COALA study are compared with data collected from surveillance data (CATS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The COALA study investigated 30 SARS-CoV‑2 outbreaks in day care centers where at least 1 SARS-CoV‑2 case was reported between October 2020 and June 2021. Using a prospective study design, day care children who were infected with SARS-CoV‑2 and their contact persons were studied over a period of 12 days (including regular SARS-CoV‑2 testing, retrospective interviews and daily symptom reporting). The results from the COALA study were compared with data from COVID-19 surveillance cases (CATS) for the same age group and time period. In Germany, SARS-CoV‑2 cases are reported to the local health authorities by physicians and laboratories. When reporting cases symptoms can be reported as well.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the COALA study, interview and reported symptom data were available for 289 children from the participating day care centers. Of 39 children with a SARS-CoV‑2 infection (wild-type, α‑variant), 64% had at least 1 symptom; of the children who tested negative for SARS-CoV‑2, 40% had at least 1 symptom. In both groups, rhinitis was the most common symptom (36% vs. 25%, n. s.). From the surveillance data (CATS), clinical information was available for 84,371 SARS-CoV‑2 positive children; fever was most common (27%) along with rhinitis (26%). Severe symptoms such as dyspnea were rarely reported in the outbreak investigations and in the surveillance data (3% and 1%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Day care-aged children infected with SARS-CoV‑2 usually have mild or asymptomatic courses. Their symptoms are similar to those of children who tested negative for SARS-CoV‑2 from the same day care centers; thus, the observed COVID-19 symptoms are nonspecific. Combining data from the two modules is useful: findings from a very large database, as provided by the surveillance data, are complemented by findings from day care center outbreaks, where detailed prospective data on infected children can be compared with those of children who tested negative for SARS-CoV‑2.</p>","PeriodicalId":520712,"journal":{"name":"Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde","volume":" ","pages":"1113-1121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645339/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00112-022-01640-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The symptoms of SARS-CoV‑2 infections in children are mostly mild; however, the symptoms are highly variable. There are only a few studies on non-hospitalized children. The clinical picture described in hospitalized children cannot be transferred to non-hospitalized children and the frequency of certain symptoms in children may thus be overestimated. Furthermore, most studies include a broad age group (up to 18 years). The symptoms of younger children have so far been described in less detail.

Objective: The paper aims to describe the frequency of COVID-19 symptoms in younger children (1-6 years old). Data of the two modules COALA (Corona: Anlassbezogene Untersuchungen in Kitas) and CATS (Corona-KiTa surveillance) of the Corona-KiTa study are evaluated and the results of the two studies are compared and discussed against the background of the different methodologies. In the COALA study, the type and frequency of symptoms of children infected with SARS-CoV‑2 are evaluated and compared to symptoms of children who tested negative for SARS-CoV‑2. Symptom frequencies of SARS-CoV‑2 infected children of the COALA study are compared with data collected from surveillance data (CATS).

Material and methods: The COALA study investigated 30 SARS-CoV‑2 outbreaks in day care centers where at least 1 SARS-CoV‑2 case was reported between October 2020 and June 2021. Using a prospective study design, day care children who were infected with SARS-CoV‑2 and their contact persons were studied over a period of 12 days (including regular SARS-CoV‑2 testing, retrospective interviews and daily symptom reporting). The results from the COALA study were compared with data from COVID-19 surveillance cases (CATS) for the same age group and time period. In Germany, SARS-CoV‑2 cases are reported to the local health authorities by physicians and laboratories. When reporting cases symptoms can be reported as well.

Results: From the COALA study, interview and reported symptom data were available for 289 children from the participating day care centers. Of 39 children with a SARS-CoV‑2 infection (wild-type, α‑variant), 64% had at least 1 symptom; of the children who tested negative for SARS-CoV‑2, 40% had at least 1 symptom. In both groups, rhinitis was the most common symptom (36% vs. 25%, n. s.). From the surveillance data (CATS), clinical information was available for 84,371 SARS-CoV‑2 positive children; fever was most common (27%) along with rhinitis (26%). Severe symptoms such as dyspnea were rarely reported in the outbreak investigations and in the surveillance data (3% and 1%, respectively).

Conclusion: Day care-aged children infected with SARS-CoV‑2 usually have mild or asymptomatic courses. Their symptoms are similar to those of children who tested negative for SARS-CoV‑2 from the same day care centers; thus, the observed COVID-19 symptoms are nonspecific. Combining data from the two modules is useful: findings from a very large database, as provided by the surveillance data, are complemented by findings from day care center outbreaks, where detailed prospective data on infected children can be compared with those of children who tested negative for SARS-CoV‑2.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

[日托年龄儿童SARS-CoV-2感染症状]。
背景:儿童感染SARS-CoV‑2的症状多为轻度;然而,症状变化很大。关于非住院儿童的研究很少。住院儿童的临床情况不能转移到非住院儿童,因此某些儿童症状的频率可能被高估。此外,大多数研究包括一个广泛的年龄组(18岁以下)。到目前为止,对年幼儿童的症状描述不太详细。目的:本文旨在描述幼儿(1-6岁)COVID-19症状的频率。对冠状病毒研究的COALA (Corona: Anlassbezogene Untersuchungen in Kitas)和CATS (Corona- kita surveillance)两个模块的数据进行了评价,并在不同方法的背景下对两项研究的结果进行了比较和讨论。在COALA研究中,评估了感染SARS-CoV‑2的儿童的症状类型和频率,并将其与SARS-CoV‑2检测呈阴性的儿童的症状进行了比较。将COALA研究中SARS-CoV‑2感染儿童的症状频率与监测数据(CATS)收集的数据进行比较。材料和方法:COALA研究调查了2020年10月至2021年6月期间在日托中心报告至少1例SARS-CoV - 2病例的30例SARS-CoV - 2疫情。采用前瞻性研究设计,对感染SARS-CoV - 2的日托儿童及其接触者进行为期12天的研究(包括定期的SARS-CoV - 2检测、回顾性访谈和每日症状报告)。将COALA研究结果与同一年龄组和时间段的COVID-19监测病例(CATS)数据进行比较。在德国,SARS-CoV - 2病例由医生和实验室向地方卫生当局报告。在报告病例时,还可以报告症状。结果:从COALA研究中获得289名来自参与日托中心的儿童的访谈和报告症状数据。在39例感染SARS-CoV - 2(野生型,α -变异)的儿童中,64%至少有一种症状;在SARS-CoV‑2检测呈阴性的儿童中,40%至少有一种症状。在两组中,鼻炎是最常见的症状(36% vs. 25%, n. s.)。从监测数据(CATS)中,可获得84,371名SARS-CoV‑2阳性儿童的临床信息;发烧最常见(27%),同时伴有鼻炎(26%)。在疫情调查和监测数据中很少报告呼吸困难等严重症状(分别为3%和1%)。结论:日托学龄儿童感染SARS-CoV‑2的病程通常为轻度或无症状。他们的症状与来自同一日托中心的SARS-CoV‑2检测呈阴性的儿童相似;因此,观察到的COVID-19症状是非特异性的。将这两个模块的数据结合起来是有用的:来自监测数据提供的非常大的数据库的结果与来自日托中心疫情的结果相辅相成,在日托中心,可以将受感染儿童的详细前瞻性数据与SARS-CoV - 2检测呈阴性的儿童的数据进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书