Quality Assurance of Undergraduate Medical Education in Israel by Continuous Monitoring and Prioritization of the Accreditation Standards.

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jochanan Benbassat, Reuben Baumal, Robert Cohen
{"title":"Quality Assurance of Undergraduate Medical Education in Israel by Continuous Monitoring and Prioritization of the Accreditation Standards.","authors":"Jochanan Benbassat,&nbsp;Reuben Baumal,&nbsp;Robert Cohen","doi":"10.5041/RMMJ.10480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>External accreditation reviews of undergraduate medical curricula play an important role in their quality assurance. However, these reviews occur only at 4-10-year intervals and are not optimal for the immediate identification of problems related to teaching. Therefore, the Standards of Medical Education in Israel require medical schools to engage in continuous, ongoing monitoring of their teaching programs for compliance with accreditation standards. In this paper, we propose the following: (1) this monitoring be assigned to independent medical education units (MEUs), rather than to an infrastructure of the dean's office, and such MEUs to be part of the school governance and draw their authority from university institutions; and (2) the differences in the importance of the accreditation standards be addressed by discerning between the \"most important\" standards that have been shown to improve student well-being and/or patient health outcomes; \"important\" standards associated with student learning and/or performance; \"possibly important\" standards with face validity or conflicting evidence for validity; and \"least important\" standards that may lead to undesirable consequences. According to this proposal, MEUs will evolve into entities dedicated to ongoing monitoring of the education program for compliance with accreditation standards, with an authority to implement interventions. Hopefully, this will provide MEUs and faculty with the common purpose of meeting accreditation requirements, and an agreed-upon prioritization of accreditation standards will improve their communication and recommendations to faculty.</p>","PeriodicalId":46408,"journal":{"name":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345766/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

External accreditation reviews of undergraduate medical curricula play an important role in their quality assurance. However, these reviews occur only at 4-10-year intervals and are not optimal for the immediate identification of problems related to teaching. Therefore, the Standards of Medical Education in Israel require medical schools to engage in continuous, ongoing monitoring of their teaching programs for compliance with accreditation standards. In this paper, we propose the following: (1) this monitoring be assigned to independent medical education units (MEUs), rather than to an infrastructure of the dean's office, and such MEUs to be part of the school governance and draw their authority from university institutions; and (2) the differences in the importance of the accreditation standards be addressed by discerning between the "most important" standards that have been shown to improve student well-being and/or patient health outcomes; "important" standards associated with student learning and/or performance; "possibly important" standards with face validity or conflicting evidence for validity; and "least important" standards that may lead to undesirable consequences. According to this proposal, MEUs will evolve into entities dedicated to ongoing monitoring of the education program for compliance with accreditation standards, with an authority to implement interventions. Hopefully, this will provide MEUs and faculty with the common purpose of meeting accreditation requirements, and an agreed-upon prioritization of accreditation standards will improve their communication and recommendations to faculty.

通过持续监测和确定认证标准的优先顺序来保证以色列本科医学教育的质量。
本科医学课程的外部认证审查在其质量保证方面发挥着重要作用。然而,这些审查每隔4-10年进行一次,并不是立即发现与教学有关的问题的最佳选择。因此,《以色列医学教育标准》要求医学院对其教学方案进行持续、持续的监测,以确保符合认证标准。在本文中,我们提出以下建议:(1)将这种监测分配给独立的医学教育单位(meu),而不是院长办公室的基础设施,这些meu应成为学校治理的一部分,并从大学机构获得权力;(2)通过区分已被证明可以改善学生福祉和/或患者健康结果的“最重要”标准来解决认证标准重要性的差异;与学生学习及/或表现有关的“重要”标准;“可能重要”的标准具有表面效度或与效度证据相矛盾的标准;以及可能导致不良后果的“最不重要”标准。根据该提案,meu将演变为致力于持续监测教育计划是否符合认证标准的实体,并有权实施干预措施。希望这将为meu和教师提供满足认证要求的共同目标,并且商定的认证标准优先级将改善他们与教师的沟通和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信