Possible Association between the Quantity of Peri-implant Crevicular Fluid, Clinical Indices, and the Dimensions of Endosseous Implants.

IF 1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research Pub Date : 2022-09-30 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.5037/jomr.2022.13303

Onurcem Duruel, Samir Goyushov, Nil Yakar, Güliz Nigar Güncü, Erdem Karabulut, Tolga Fikret Tözüm

{"title":"Possible Association between the Quantity of Peri-implant Crevicular Fluid, Clinical Indices, and the Dimensions of Endosseous Implants.","authors":"Onurcem Duruel, Samir Goyushov, Nil Yakar, Güliz Nigar Güncü, Erdem Karabulut, Tolga Fikret Tözüm","doi":"10.5037/jomr.2022.13303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The objectives of this clinical observational study are to measure peri-implant crevicular fluid volume based on dental implant diameter and length, and to evaluate the possible relationship between peri-implant crevicular fluid/gingival crevicular fluid volumes and clinical periodontal indices.Material and methods: The information about length and diameter of dental implants was noted. Clinical indices (probing depth, plaque index, gingival bleeding time index, and gingival index) were recorded. Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF)/gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volumes were measured from 4 sites (mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual/palatal) of each dental implant including its one or more equivalent natural tooth/teeth.Results: One-hundred-sixty-one loaded dental implants and 221 natural teeth of 101 patients were evaluated. The length of dental implant had no effect on PICF volume (P > 0.05). However, PICF volumes of narrow (< 3.5 mm) and wide (> 4.5 mm) diameter implants were higher than standard diameter implants (≥ 3.5 mm, and ≤ 4.5 mm) (P < 0.05). PICF and GCF volumes of areas with peri-implant/periodontal diseases were significantly higher than healthy areas (P < 0.05). PICF and GCF volumes showed positive correlations with clinical indices (P < 0.05).Conclusions: In accordance with the results of the present study, the implant diameter, not the implant length, affects peri-implant crevicular fluid volume.","PeriodicalId":53254,"journal":{"name":"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/f0/jomr-13-e3.PMC9617251.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2022.13303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this clinical observational study are to measure peri-implant crevicular fluid volume based on dental implant diameter and length, and to evaluate the possible relationship between peri-implant crevicular fluid/gingival crevicular fluid volumes and clinical periodontal indices.

Material and methods: The information about length and diameter of dental implants was noted. Clinical indices (probing depth, plaque index, gingival bleeding time index, and gingival index) were recorded. Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF)/gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volumes were measured from 4 sites (mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual/palatal) of each dental implant including its one or more equivalent natural tooth/teeth.

Results: One-hundred-sixty-one loaded dental implants and 221 natural teeth of 101 patients were evaluated. The length of dental implant had no effect on PICF volume (P > 0.05). However, PICF volumes of narrow (< 3.5 mm) and wide (> 4.5 mm) diameter implants were higher than standard diameter implants (≥ 3.5 mm, and ≤ 4.5 mm) (P < 0.05). PICF and GCF volumes of areas with peri-implant/periodontal diseases were significantly higher than healthy areas (P < 0.05). PICF and GCF volumes showed positive correlations with clinical indices (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: In accordance with the results of the present study, the implant diameter, not the implant length, affects peri-implant crevicular fluid volume.

查看原文本刊更多论文

种植体周围沟液的数量、临床指标和骨内种植体的尺寸之间可能存在的联系。

目的:本临床观察研究的目的是根据种植体直径和长度测量种植体周围沟液的体积，并评估种植体周围沟液/牙龈沟液体积与临床牙周指标之间的可能关系。材料和方法:记录种植体的长度和直径。记录临床指标(探诊深度、菌斑指数、牙龈出血时间指数、牙龈指数)。从每个牙种植体的4个位置(中、颊、远端和舌/腭)测量种植体周围沟液(PICF)/龈沟液(GCF)体积，包括其一个或多个等效的天然牙/牙齿。结果:对101例患者的161颗负载种植体和221颗自然牙进行了评估。种植体长度对PICF体积无显著影响(P > 0.05)。窄直径(< 3.5 mm)和宽直径(> 4.5 mm)种植体的PICF体积高于标准直径种植体(≥3.5 mm和≤4.5 mm) (P < 0.05)。种植周/牙周病区PICF和GCF体积显著高于健康区(P < 0.05)。PICF、GCF体积与临床指标呈正相关(P < 0.05)。结论:根据本研究的结果，影响种植体周围沟液量的是种植体直径，而不是种植体长度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks