Fayeza S Ahmed, Taylor M McMillan, Benjamin A Guenther, Peter Dearborn
{"title":"Cognitive Performance following Single- or Multi-Session Exercise Intervention in Middle Age: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Fayeza S Ahmed, Taylor M McMillan, Benjamin A Guenther, Peter Dearborn","doi":"10.1080/0361073X.2022.2137360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research in modifiable behaviors, like exercise, on risk for dementia is increasing. Although many studies focus on older adults, brain pathology for Alzheimer's Disease can begin in middle age, suggesting an ideal target for intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review from exercise intervention studies on cognitive function among healthy, middle-aged participants (45-65). We searched multiple databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar) for studies using standard, validated, neuropsychological measures following either single- or multi-session interventions in cognitively-unimpaired, middle-aged adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 13 eligible studies. There was notable heterogeneity across studies, with varying design, measures, interventions, and results. Results from single-session studies showed improvement in response inhibition, while results for cognitive flexibility were mixed. No significant changes were found on measures of attention, working memory, or processing speed. Results from multi-session studies were more varied. Verbal memory was found to improve while performance on tests of attention and working memory, processing speed, and executive function were mixed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Importantly, for both single-session and multi-session studies, there was no standard set of neuropsychological tests administered, making it more difficult to synthesize the findings into a single narrative. We end with a discussion on future directions and implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12240,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Aging Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2022.2137360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Research in modifiable behaviors, like exercise, on risk for dementia is increasing. Although many studies focus on older adults, brain pathology for Alzheimer's Disease can begin in middle age, suggesting an ideal target for intervention.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review from exercise intervention studies on cognitive function among healthy, middle-aged participants (45-65). We searched multiple databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar) for studies using standard, validated, neuropsychological measures following either single- or multi-session interventions in cognitively-unimpaired, middle-aged adults.
Results: We identified 13 eligible studies. There was notable heterogeneity across studies, with varying design, measures, interventions, and results. Results from single-session studies showed improvement in response inhibition, while results for cognitive flexibility were mixed. No significant changes were found on measures of attention, working memory, or processing speed. Results from multi-session studies were more varied. Verbal memory was found to improve while performance on tests of attention and working memory, processing speed, and executive function were mixed.
Conclusion: Importantly, for both single-session and multi-session studies, there was no standard set of neuropsychological tests administered, making it more difficult to synthesize the findings into a single narrative. We end with a discussion on future directions and implementation.
背景:对运动等可改变痴呆症风险的行为的研究正在增加。尽管许多研究都集中在老年人身上,但阿尔茨海默病的大脑病理变化可能始于中年,这表明运动是理想的干预目标:我们对健康中年参与者(45-65 岁)的认知功能运动干预研究进行了系统性回顾。我们在多个数据库(PubMed、PsycINFO、MEDLINE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Google Scholar)中检索了对认知功能未受损的中年人进行单次或多次干预后使用标准、有效的神经心理学测量方法的研究:我们确定了 13 项符合条件的研究。不同研究之间存在明显的异质性,其设计、测量方法、干预措施和结果各不相同。单次疗程研究的结果显示,反应抑制能力有所改善,而认知灵活性方面的结果则参差不齐。在注意力、工作记忆或处理速度的测量方面没有发现明显的变化。多疗程研究的结果差异较大。口头记忆有所改善,而注意力、工作记忆、处理速度和执行功能的测试结果则参差不齐:重要的是,无论是单次研究还是多次研究,都没有一套标准的神经心理学测试,因此更难将研究结果归纳为一个单一的叙述。最后,我们就未来的方向和实施进行了讨论。
期刊介绍:
Experimental Aging Research is a life span developmental and aging journal dealing with research on the aging process from a psychological and psychobiological perspective. It meets the need for a scholarly journal with refereed scientific papers dealing with age differences and age changes at any point in the adult life span. Areas of major focus include experimental psychology, neuropsychology, psychobiology, work research, ergonomics, and behavioral medicine. Original research, book reviews, monographs, and papers covering special topics are published.