Nurses' Pain Assessment Practices for Cognitively Intact and Impaired Older Adults in Intensive Care Units.

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra Pub Date : 2022-07-04 eCollection Date: 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1159/000525477
Mohammad Rababa, Shatha Al-Sabbah
{"title":"Nurses' Pain Assessment Practices for Cognitively Intact and Impaired Older Adults in Intensive Care Units.","authors":"Mohammad Rababa,&nbsp;Shatha Al-Sabbah","doi":"10.1159/000525477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pain is still under-recognized and undertreated among intensive care unit (ICU) patients, such as those being intubated or with dementia, cognitive impairments, or communication deficits due to inability to self-report. This study aimed to describe nurses' pain assessment practices for cognitively intact and impaired older adult ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive correlational study of a convenience sample of 200 registered nurses was conducted in private, public, and university-affiliated hospitals in Irbid, Jordan. Descriptive statistics, such as mean, standard deviation, and frequency, were used to analyze the study data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of nurses who assessed and documented pain every 1-4 h in cognitively intact patients than those with cognitive impairment (<i>n</i> = 67, 63.21% vs. <i>n</i> = 39, 36.79%), <i>p</i> = 0.002, compared to the proportion of nurses who never assessed and document pain in cognitively impaired patients than those without cognitive impairment (<i>n</i> = 38, 76.0% vs. <i>n</i> = 12, 24%), <i>p</i> < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Our study results showed that the majority of participant nurses felt that the use of pain assessment tools for cognitively intact and impaired older adult ICU patients to self-report is somewhat not at all important. This study also reported that nurses perceived themselves as the individuals who accurately rate the pain in cognitively intact patients, followed by the patients themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":38017,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/83/81/dee-0012-0115.PMC9294931.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Pain is still under-recognized and undertreated among intensive care unit (ICU) patients, such as those being intubated or with dementia, cognitive impairments, or communication deficits due to inability to self-report. This study aimed to describe nurses' pain assessment practices for cognitively intact and impaired older adult ICU patients.

Methods: A descriptive correlational study of a convenience sample of 200 registered nurses was conducted in private, public, and university-affiliated hospitals in Irbid, Jordan. Descriptive statistics, such as mean, standard deviation, and frequency, were used to analyze the study data.

Results: Statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of nurses who assessed and documented pain every 1-4 h in cognitively intact patients than those with cognitive impairment (n = 67, 63.21% vs. n = 39, 36.79%), p = 0.002, compared to the proportion of nurses who never assessed and document pain in cognitively impaired patients than those without cognitive impairment (n = 38, 76.0% vs. n = 12, 24%), p < 0.001.

Discussion/conclusion: Our study results showed that the majority of participant nurses felt that the use of pain assessment tools for cognitively intact and impaired older adult ICU patients to self-report is somewhat not at all important. This study also reported that nurses perceived themselves as the individuals who accurately rate the pain in cognitively intact patients, followed by the patients themselves.

重症监护病房中认知完整和认知受损老年人的护士疼痛评估实践。
在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中,疼痛仍然未被充分认识和治疗,例如那些插管或患有痴呆,认知障碍或由于无法自我报告而导致的沟通缺陷的患者。本研究旨在描述护士对认知完整和认知受损的老年ICU患者的疼痛评估实践。方法:对约旦伊尔比德私立、公立和大学附属医院的200名注册护士进行描述性相关研究。使用描述性统计,如平均值、标准差和频率来分析研究数据。结果:与认知障碍患者相比,每1-4小时评估和记录认知障碍患者疼痛的护士比例(n = 67, 63.21% vs. n = 39, 36.79%), p = 0.002;与无认知障碍患者相比,从未评估和记录认知障碍患者疼痛的护士比例(n = 38, 76.0% vs. n = 12, 24%), p < 0.001。讨论/结论:我们的研究结果显示,大多数参与研究的护士认为,使用疼痛评估工具对认知完好和受损的老年ICU患者进行自我报告并不重要。该研究还报告说,护士认为自己是准确评估认知完整患者疼痛的个体,其次是患者自己。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: This open access and online-only journal publishes original articles covering the entire spectrum of cognitive dysfunction such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra provides additional contents based on reviewed and accepted submissions to the main journal Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信